• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

J & P, just there to provide order, or something more?

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,243
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Why is that a profound flaw rather than perhaps an inconvenient nomenclature? Users trained on the actual instrument know J/P point to the extraverted function, which is only the dominant for E's? It might be a trick for people to pick up but it isn't about the theory, only about understanding the code. I admit that socionics has a perhaps easier-to-understand method with j and p but...

I didn't see it as a flaw either; it's merely nomenclature, and easily understood once you have the information, and not an unreasonable choice by the system designers -- it serves a purpose.
 
Top