[Ne] Ne, At Its Inward-turning Worst, Follows Ni Leadership.

[sculpting]

If Ne bends inward enough to curve around and be bending back outwards again, is it really bending outwards at that point or is it really more of a hyper-extension of the bending inwards?

To me, it loops and weaves. Like when sewing, how you weave in, then out, then in then back out again, each time merging, the watching, then merging anew-it is play. To use Ni, as an Ne user, is to build a framework of a net, then to peer within that framework and see what coalesces from the nothingness. Lots of pretty stuff there

 

[Pionart]

I thought Kant was what happened when my Te bends inwards. Didn't know he was Ni

 

[Mal12345]

And what happens if you bend forwards?

Jung is not an end in himself, he is only a starting point.

 

[INTP]

Jung is not an end in himself, he is only a starting point.

Yea, but does it end to surprises in the butt?

 

[Mal12345]

Yea, but does it end to surprises in the butt?

Fuck off little boy who stopped thinking.

 

[INTP]

Fuck off little boy who stopped thinking.

:-----DDD

 

[Mal12345]

:-----DDD

:-----DDD [MENTION=195]Jaguar[/MENTION]

 

[GarrotTheThief]

Ne as a shadow function is paralyzing "what if questions," that cause the user to pause and be uncertain and crippled with fear.