In my example of the student and the former teacher of mine, I did not mean to imply that the student pulled the answer out of his figurative ass. I'm saying that, from the teacher's pointofview, he may as well as have, because the student provided no formal proof. It didn't just so happen that his answer was right, it was right, only his method of arriving at it was a personal one, a method born of his personal method of intuition and not of objectively demonstrable proof.
User Tag List
Thread: INTPs and Mathematics

10172014, 04:55 PM #11"Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
''It's a classic McCarthyite tactic of the left to question the motives and good faith of those who disagree with them.'' Andrew Sullivan

10182014, 09:58 PM #12
 Join Date
 Feb 2014
 MBTI
 INTP
 Posts
 57
If there's a difference between leaps of logic and jumping to a conclusion, I can't see it.
Induction requires knowledge of axioms plus the addition of elements not involved in the original problem, as in geometry, adding imaginary lines to a given triangle in order to induce the mathematical properties of triangles in general. In other words, the inductive form of proof applies to all triangles, also thought of as the universal form of all triangles in general, whereas deductive proofs only apply to particular situations.

10182014, 10:01 PM #13
 Join Date
 Feb 2014
 MBTI
 INTP
 Posts
 57

10192014, 08:51 AM #14"Everyone has a plan till they get punched in the mouth." Mike Tyson
''It's a classic McCarthyite tactic of the left to question the motives and good faith of those who disagree with them.'' Andrew Sullivan

10202014, 06:10 PM #15
I generally had a hard time explaining my working. I've had people describe my approach as intuitive, often when it's geometric (a visual proof). I struggle most on proof questions, where it appears quite reasonable that a thing is true, but you have to use just the right definitions and theorems to make it work.

10202014, 07:45 PM #16
 Join Date
 Jan 2013
 Posts
 795
I'm not obsessed about Math. Math was easy for me in school (maybe having a natural ability to do Math is a better INTP stereotype), but Computer Science was clearly my favorite subject.
As for having to show your work, that makes sense to me, but I always noticed the obsession with getting everyone to do this, and thought it was strange. I also noticed constant attempts to warp and twist everyone's method of thinking until it was dull, dry, and procedural, and until the ability to make mental leaps was gone. I always thought mental leaps and intuitively solving problems is what Math is all about, not clearly and meticulously documenting your failure to do so (if they get their way, you'll go from effortlessly breezing through solving a problem without making any mistakes to consciously and unnaturally applying explicit steps from a textbook and to constantly make mistakes while not being able to think straight and while having their voice linger in your head constantly calling you stupid).

10212014, 05:46 PM #17
I dont like the type of math where i need to learn some formula and then follow it(like some advanced statistical math), but if i need to calculate for example how much is 4.50€ per day for 28 days in my head thats pretty easy and can do that sort of stuff easily. First 3 x 4 = 12, then add one zero to the end = 120. 30 x 0.5 = 15. 120 + 15 = 135. but since i used 30 as multiplier(instead of 28) to make things easy, now i just need to remove 2 x 4.5 = 9 from it, so 28 x 4.5 = 126. Also i used to calculate stuff for diablo 2 back in the days quite a lot to really minmax everything, like how much enhanced dmg adds compared to maximum damage jewels(or minmax dmg or ed/max dmg) and how much stats effect life or to damage etc. which wasnt bad because it gave more room to thinking than learning.. Or it did at first, because i didnt pay much attention to math at school and pretty much just reasoned how those things needs to be calculated.
I think reasoning is whats the strong side of INTPs, and math kinda requires some reasoning or at least some math does, but you can just memorize math formulas and calculate things correctly using a calculator, which is the way some types like to do math, which i dont think INTPs usually enjoy..

10212014, 08:40 PM #18
I know ISTPs, xSFPs, an ISTJ, an ENTJ, a ExFJ, an ENTP, and an ENFP and they are all great at math.
I personally hate it and am terrible at it, but always loved science.

10232014, 11:38 AM #19
I was into the patterns of numbers (such as with polygons), and other symmetries. This is basically the idea of math, but the practical application of it: the forumulas, (which is heavy SiTe), is where I always lost interest and faltered. I look at all those pages of formulas in science (Einstein, etc), and feel chills. Can't remember it, and bored with preset logical application. (And will often find fault with the agreedupon way of putting things, and where symmetry is not consistently followed).
APS Profile: Inclusion: e/w=1/6 (Supine) Control: e/w=7/3 (Choleric) Affection: e/w=1/9 (Supine)
Ti 54.3  Ne 47.3  Si 37.8  Fe 17.7  Te 22.5  Ni 13.4  Se 18.9  Fi 27.9
Temperament (APS) from scratch  MBTI Type from scratch
Type Ideas

10232014, 11:45 AM #20
I majored in math for two years at college, then got both bored and frustrated.
I had issues with it getting both too detached from reality as well as having trouble with the more complex modelling to describe scenarios. It didn't seem like I was improving even with spending more energy proportionally on math than my other coursework.
I've always been kind of split in my interest and capability between science and humanistic pursuits, and the level of math i was studying was outside of that "sweet spot" for me  way too detached.
As far as doing "numbers calculations," like what my ISFJ ex does for a living and really enjoys (accounting stuff), I can't imagine many worse hells.
Sets weren't too bad, those and sequences were rather fun.
I also appreciated the logic theory, but that's basically stuff I pull into more general "logical proof" stuff in regular language. Those concepts were pretty useful to me.
I found programming more interesting than pure math  using logic to make the machine do something that interfaced with humans."Hey Capa  We're only stardust." ~ "Sunshine"
“Pleasure to me is wonder—the unexplored, the unexpected, the thing that is hidden and the changeless thing that lurks behind superficial mutability. To trace the remote in the immediate; the eternal in the ephemeral; the past in the present; the infinite in the finite; these are to me the springs of delight and beauty.” ~ H.P. Lovecraft
Similar Threads

[INTP] INTP and Escapism
By The Unknown Essence in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)Replies: 13Last Post: 04082008, 05:01 PM 
[INTP] The INTP and Feelings
By reason in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)Replies: 121Last Post: 04042008, 11:02 AM 
[INTP] INTPs and Big Crowds/Concerts
By intpgirl in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)Replies: 30Last Post: 03042008, 06:33 PM 
[INTP] INTPs and Grammar
By MerkW in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)Replies: 49Last Post: 02172008, 07:06 AM 
[INTP] INTPs and life
By JonJT in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)Replies: 20Last Post: 01242008, 08:53 PM