_

[funtensity]

_

 

[chaoticbrain]

Awesome idea.

Will be interesting to see what you find.

 

[chaoticbrain]

Woah, that's a lot of data.

And ya I can still help you if you want me to try collecting data, but I'm not even sure how you collected that much.

Out of curiosity, do you need programming knowledge to run something like this ?

 

[chaoticbrain]

Double post

 

[Cellmold]

I really need a much bigger dataset. And a big part of the problem is that I need the author to be accurately typed.. at least on average, but preferably all the time.

Well once you've cracked that you have cracked most of typology.

 

[garbage]

Damn, man. Actual empirical testing. Gotta love it.

How does your method fare on dichotomies rather than functions? Might be worth trying out.

 

[EJCC]

Looking good so far! Interested in how this will end up going.

Might be worth going to another forum or two to add supplemental data for the types on the lower end of the posting spectrum? e.g. the SJ posts are primarily going to be a handful of people (me, giggly, puremercury, Patches, etc), which isn't a diverse set of styles to go from.

 

[baccheion]

personalitycafe would be a good one. They have a nice mix of types there, and more feelers.

 

[AphroditeGoneAwry]

I'm accurately typed.

Cool beans. At one point, I also wanted to come up with better cognitive functions tests.