• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

How does my archetypes theory compare with the MBTI?

chaoticbrain

New member
Joined
Jul 17, 2013
Messages
82
MBTI Type
NeTi
Enneagram
6
Instinctual Variant
sx
[MENTION=7595]INTP[/MENTION] So do you not think then that "archetypes" can correlate with any kind of behavior at all ? Atleast long term behavior ? Because you think archetypes can take so many forms , and that people shift between archetypes so rapidly ?
 

INTP

Active member
Joined
Jul 31, 2009
Messages
7,803
MBTI Type
intp
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sx
INTP So do you not think then that "archetypes" can correlate with any kind of behavior at all ? Atleast long term behavior ? Because you think archetypes can take so many forms , and that people shift between archetypes so rapidly ?

This is the jungian model of the psyche:
KPdwXN4.jpg


Archetypes are the foundation of the whole psyche, as i mentioned all of the complexes have roots in archetypes and complexes are what is guiding your consciousness.

Its not that archetype correlates with behavior(as you should had figured out from what i already said), its that archetypes are the foundation of complexes and complexes are the foundation of consciousness and all non instinctual behavior comes from consciousness. Its more like that archetype is the overall theme of a movie, complexes are what led to the current situation and consciousness is what ever is experienced at the moment.

Here is a definition of archetype from one article on journal of analytical psychology:
Archetypal Themes in Depression
ROBERT F. HOBSON

Archetypes are understood to be the typical forms in which all experience is patterned, organized, and progressively integrated, and hence cannot be adequately described apart from the "matter" in which they are observed. Jung's differentiation of personal unconscious from collective unconscious and of reductive from synthetic analysis, is not taken to imply an absolute distinction, but to refer to different modes of description and treatment of psychological material, which special reference to either "personal" history or to "collective" forms. Individual archetypal themes are clear in certain abnormal states and particular phases of development as, for example, in some phantasies of psychotics and young children, but are most easily served in mythology. Hence, Jung has used the study of myths to amplify, understand and modify developmental processes in patients. It is important to remember, however that the myth is a complex image and is not synonymous with the archetype, by which is meant the form and not the particular contents of the image. This form is most usefully conceived, not as a static pattern, but as a progressive theme and it is the tendency to develop experience in universally typical forms which is considered to be innate.

Its quite annoying to explain all of this to you guys because it feels like trying to teach statistical math to someone who doesent know the basic math like adding numbers together or multiplying them :/ . Its incredibly frustrating and all i can say is that you should read some books.
 
Top