• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Are we ultimately more defined by our inferior functions than dominant?

I

Infinite Bubble

Guest
We are defined by our dominant and inferior equally, as they are both tied for most-used functions. It is just that we are oriented to one side consciously, and the other unconsciously, so we neglect the latter (in the conscious mind). The function pairs (e.g. Ne-Si) should in my opinion be regarded as a single construct, as it works as such.
 
Top