• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Review of new book: 'The Question of Psychological Types'

Economica

Dhampyr
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
2,054
MBTI Type
INTJ
If you ever read Jung's book on the types you have probably wondered about some of the things that are just thrown in there without much of an explanation. Well, a newly published book sheds some new light on that. Here is our book review.

It has long been known that some years prior to the publication of 'Psychological Types', Jung carried on a correspondence with his colleague and former analysand, Hans Schmid-Guisan, dealing exactly with the question of psychological types. Already around the time of the publication of Jung's 'Psychological Types' there was talk of publishing this correspondence, and such considerations naturally emerged again during the years where Jung's Collected Words were being collected with the aim of committing them to print.

On both occasions, however, Jung personally vetoed the publication of these letters, stating that they were of “a highly technical nature” and that they would only “cause more confusion” than they would create clarity. Nonetheless, history tends to have little mercy for the posthumous wishes of writers and, as a rule, what has not been committed to the flames will tend to see publication sooner or later. As such, the letters in question now lie before us and already from the first pages of the correspondence, one suspects that Jung may have had ulterior motives for denying their publication as well.
 
Top