• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

How NJs and NPs view time

trancemode

New member
Joined
Jun 23, 2011
Messages
43
Enneagram
5w4
Here’s something for you to chew on. It’s a post by Lenore Thomson (“cult” author of Personality Types: An Owner’s Manual), copied and posted on another forum by someone. It’s about the contrast between NPs and NJs in their conversion of time to “spatial constructs”. Though she doesn’t mention SPs and SJs, her drift seems to be toward the difference in how Js and Ps view time, in line with her theory that Js are left brain dominant (linear), Ps right-brain (non-linear).

For me (INFP), it fits. I don’t have trouble with the expression about moving a meeting or event “up” or “back”, though I recognize that it’s backwards if I stop and think about it (which I never had until reading that post).

It’s curious how the NJs she quotes get stuck on this one common expression, amid all the others that don’t make literal sense which they have long since absorbed; surely they know what people mean when they use it. It’s hard to imagine all these NJs out there getting confused whenever someone they have plans with wants to move them “up” or “back” a day.

And how do SPs and SJs see this? If I’m right, SPs would be similar to NPs, and SJs to NJs.



1. on the
Concept of Time
by
Lenore Thomson

(Informal correspondence, used with author's permission, all rights reserved.)

I'm neither INFP nor INFJ, but I do have a kind of off-the-wall way of narrowing the distinction between NP and NJ. I'm not going to take a definitive stand on it, but it's worked out often enough that I've come to think of it as an approximate rule of thumb.

This distinction doesn't turn on behaviors or traits, so it doesn't lend itself to negative stereotypes. It's simply about the way people represent things to themselves.

Which is to say: It's been my experience that NPs pretty much take for granted that time is represented linguistically in spatial terms. Just as a country can be divided into counties and cities, we customarily divide time into segments and pieces.

NJs of course acquire the many terms that permit us to do this, but they don't appear to regard the time --> space conversion as entirely natural.

For example, when someone tells me (I'm an INTJ) that a meeting has been moved up a day, I'm *never* sure whether I'm supposed to show up a day earlier or a day later. There is nothing that feels natural to me about thinking this way. In fact, if I try to work it out in my mind, the spatial terms ultimately incline me to "picture time."

When I do, I see a linear path, on which "time" is proceeding from the past into the future. So, "moving back" a future event would mean bringing it from where it is up ahead, so that it's now closer to the present.

But the phrase actually means the opposite. Moving an event "back" is to locate it further in the future.

When several NJs discussed their problems with this expression on the psych-type list a few years ago, every one of the NPs who responded expressed surprise that anyone would even find the subject worth talking about. Some INFPs agreed that the language was imprecise, but they also regarded the complaint as a non-issue. One INFP said he just pictures his date book. Moving an event "back" in the date book is to put it closer to the back cover, or to push it further away in time.

I asked an ENFP, and he said the same sort of thing: He pictures a cup in front of him on a dinner table. Moving the cup "back" is to push it away; moving it "up" is to pull it closer.

I was really struck by this. Every NJ -- ENTJs, INTJs, INFJs and ENFJs -- who wrote about the topic experienced the same translation problem that I have. We all felt obliged to "picture time" as such.

*None* of the "pictures" supplied by the NPs had anything to do with time. They were *entirely* within the realm of space.

Since that psych-type discussion, I've talked to a lot of NJs and NPs, and just about every one of them has reacted according to type. The NJs have identified with my experience, even when they're math-oriented or scientifically educated or make blueprints for a living. They've even welcomed the opportunity to put their frustration with the time --> space conversion into words. Many said that the only way they ever get hold of images that spatialize time is to make a deliberate effort to forget that time is at issue, because the conclusions they draw on that basis never jibe with the way the images are normally understood.

In order to make the spatial images work, they try to associate them with concrete landmarks from their own experience -- like associating yearly intervals with school semesters, so that other events can be associated with specific experiences rather than the intervals themselves.

It seems to me that this distinction is functionally related, not in the sense of behavioral motivation, but in the sense of the functions describing the way in which people are accustomed to explaining things to themselves.

An NP's inner world is oriented by Introverted Judgment: a will to discern underlying organizational patterns. The outer Perceptual world (Extraverted Intuition) "just is," until the NTP recognizes underlying structural relationships and maps it, or the NFP recognizes the larger design in which all parts ideally cooperate. So perhaps these types are accustomed to grasping virtual reality in terms of spatial models.

NJs are coming at this from the other direction. It's their *inner* Perceptual world that "just is" (Introverted Intuition). Time in this inner Perceptual world doesn't exist in its own right; it's completely relative to subjective experience. It's the outer world of causal consequences and consensual limits (Extraverted Judgment) that determines a consistent standard of meaning for what's being taken in.

So NJs appear to feel a clash between spatial constructs for temporal orientation and their native experience of time, forcing them to figure out what those constructs are "supposed" to mean. In fact, the ENJs to whom I've spoken are highly critical of people who use the phrases "move up" and "move back" incorrectly, because the potential for confusion strikes them as so great.

In summary, when I'm trying to figure out whether someone is an NP or an NJ, I generally ask them whether they have a problem with the terms "moving up" and "back" an event in time. NPs will frequently acknowledge the linguistic imprecision, but they don't regard it as a big deal and will generally say they associate the phrases by analogy to other spatial events.

NJs, on the other hand, will usually agree that the linguistic convention is peculiar and makes for confusion, may welcome the opportunity to talk about something they thought was "just them," and will often maintain that they don't use the phrases with others without supplementing them with further information (We'll move the meeting up a day -- that is, from Wednesday to Tuesday).
 

Such Irony

Honor Thy Inferior
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
5,059
MBTI Type
INtp
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Interesting. I've always associated "moving up" a day as something that will occur a day earlier than planned. I've never had issue with it myself but I will agree the language is rather imprecise. Typical NP response here.
 
W

WALMART

Guest
I'd figure J types to have a firmer grasp on these linguistics, but perhaps it is just continuing the trend that they need absolute certainty when decisions are being made.


To me, it seems painfully obvious that up is nearer in the future and back implies delay.


I speed read, but it seems like I may have missed some interesting things. I'll entertain more later.
 

valentine

New member
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
106
MBTI Type
intj
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
so/sp
Time and moving of its location are generally culturally bound.

I generally like Thomson's writing but this is lacking.
 

Eric B

ⒺⓉⒷ
Joined
Mar 29, 2008
Messages
3,621
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
548
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
It seems "back=future" is from the perspective of the viewer, who thinks of himself as looking forward in time, so that the future becomes "depth", and thus "away" or "back", while past is moving toward him. Like the spatial analogy with the cup.
"back=past" seems to be looking at the "timeline" from an external position (they take themselves out of the line). So it becomes like left and right, and most of us think of right as forward, so "back" becomes left.
People look at the past direction the same way, even when the stretch of time they are looking at is still future to them. (Funny, as I remember most of us NP's also looking at future as right, but the difference must be that we don't take ourselves out of the timeline. It makes sense that Ni would look at time globally).
I guess both of these analogies would be spatial. Perhaps that's just my way of explaining it.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,192
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Never had any issues with this. Some of it is also the adaptability of P style; even when terminology can be "overthought" / over-analyzed, I simply figure out what the common use is and then flex to it. I think NJ is much more resistant to flex depending on the state of the J; I've had NJ's really dig in sometimes and refuse to accommodate new information, because they think more naturally / like the old thinking better. But P can be very adaptable, even if we have an a priori way to view something.

I don't necessarily picture pushing a teacup away or bringing it up toward me; even if I visualize a calendar, moving something "up" on the calendar (toward the top) means necessarily making it happen earlier, while pushing it "down" makes it appear later. Perhaps this is still somewhat spatial, but it's directly tied to the most common device we use to track dates. Thus it seems very obvious what the answer is. I'm not sure why or how NJs would perceive time in some totally abstract sense.
 

miss fortune

not to be trusted
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
20,589
Enneagram
827
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
I've generally viewed human time to be linear because we have the misfortune of only aging in one direction, however, time in general is possibly a lot more fluid considering the cyclical nature of nature and events :shrug:

the problem is that I'm a human and have to live by human time... I resent this :thelook:

of course, who knows what happens after death? time travel? I certainly hope so! :holy:

I suppose, furthermore, that in the reference to imprecise times like now, which is never able to pin down it would only be the border between what is set and what is possible, the future being the dark, uncharted area of the map while the past is filled in with roads, villages and mountains and such... not to mention possible time related things that we don't even KNOW about yet :thinking:

and then there's relative time, such as how time moves incredibly slowly while you are waiting for something and way too quickly once you start having fun... that would be perceptual time v actual time... :doh:

so many variables...

perhaps I'll just go with Thoreau and claim that it's the stream in which I fish and leave it at that... it sounds peaceful! :unsure:
 

Eilonwy

Vulnerability
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
7,051
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
4
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Until I read the OP, I thought moving it up a day was having it a day earlier and moving it back was putting off until a later date. But then I read the article, saw the other way of thinking about it and then got confused. I've never really thought about the spacial or the linear aspects of it.

Tangent: It reminds me of when I heard a story about Coco the gorilla. Through sign language, her humans determined that, while we think of the future as being ahead of us and the past behind us, Coco saw it the other way around because the future is something that you can't see, so it's behind you, and the past is something you can see, so it's in front of you.
 

EcK

The Memes Justify the End
Joined
Nov 21, 2008
Messages
7,708
MBTI Type
ENTP
Enneagram
738
I don't view time. I'm like, the worst person at time management, ever. I compensate with other things but ask me to remember if something happened 2 months or 2 weeks ago frankly I'm not sure I could tell you.

I don't really use spatial terms to depict the dynamics of time, because I rarely talk in terms of time in the first place. If I do I make estimates and adjust for error rates.

Then again the notions of moving things back and up (actually, forward makes more sense to me) is an idiom, as a native french/polish speaker we . oh yeah actually we do say 'avancer' which means 'to move forward' and that makes total sense to me and 'repousser' which means 'to move back' and that also makes total sense to me.

so I guess I agree with the OP that this seems like a natural way to deal with time/scheduling. But I don't know about NJs.
 

miss fortune

not to be trusted
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
20,589
Enneagram
827
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
Tangent: It reminds me of when I heard a story about Coco the gorilla. Through sign language, her humans determined that, while we think of the future as being ahead of us and the past behind us, Coco saw it the other way around because the future is something that you can't see, so it's behind you, and the past is something you can see, so it's in front of you.

:holy: like Discworld trolls!
 

FDG

pathwise dependent
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
5,903
MBTI Type
ENTJ
Enneagram
7w8
no really, i propose a far easier explanation:

in those calendars people put on the wall, a day earlier is "up" compared to a given day, and a day later is "down". Thus all these people misteriously referring to meetings being moved "up" (earlier) and "down" (later).
 

Kierva

#KUWK
Joined
Dec 8, 2010
Messages
2,469
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
SP here, when I heard the "move up" phrase I literally moved my hand up, and so I thought it was like pushing the day back.

Not sure if correct or wrong?
 

miss fortune

not to be trusted
Joined
Oct 4, 2007
Messages
20,589
Enneagram
827
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
SP here, when I heard the "move up" phrase I literally moved my hand up, and so I thought it was like pushing the day back.

Not sure if correct or wrong?

better than thinking of the theme song to "The Jeffersons" :doh:

it can ALWAYS be worse! :boohoo:
 
G

Glycerine

Guest
I have a much harder time when someone tells me something is due at 12:00. I think that's why I love military time. :D
 

Randomnity

insert random title here
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
9,485
MBTI Type
ISTP
Enneagram
6w5
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
I don't hear anyone saying "move up a day" or "move back a day". That would be horrendously confusing and I have no idea what either of those mean. I would imagine both of those as "later than originally planned", actually. Maybe that phrasing is more common in the US? What I'm more used to would be something like "move the meeting earlier" or "move the meeting later", which isn't ambiguous.
 

Athenian200

Protocol Droid
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
8,828
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
4w5
I don't really know that terminology, I've never really heard people use "moving up" or "moving back," and I really hope they don't start.

However, when I guessed what it meant, I guessed wrong. To me, it makes more sense to me think of time in terms of forwards and backwards. We always talk about going back in time, and we mean the past when we say this. Naturally, going forwards in time means going to the future.

I view time as being like an invisible river that flows through all of space in one direction. If you let the current carry you forward, or swim with it, you end up in the future. If you have the capacity to paddle against it, you could go back against the current... perhaps even to the river's origin, the beginning of time.

I asked an INTP friend of mine, and he sees it in the same way I do... although his description was way more complex, involving mathematics.

To me, the issue here really isn't about linguistic precision or whatever, to me, space and time are the same thing; I find that they are essentially intertwined in a way that they cannot be truly separated. When you talk about "next Tuesday", you mean going from point T to T1. You are traveling through space as "time" passes, so when I think of an event that is moved "up", I see it as something that is farther away. For example, if we have a plane with four dimensions, the fourth dimension contains the actual event, and when it is moved "up", it is moved farther along in the positive direction of the x-y-z axis.

So this is a simple chart of how I see it. The blue bars are the fourth dimension, as you can see they intersect our normal three. The point T is Tuesday (now), and T1 is next Tuesday. Now, if you are at, say, some point M (Monday, right before T), and someone said, "we're moving the event up", then it would go to T1, because it's being pushed up through time, and thus along the axes. When something is "moved back", it's closer to the point of origin, and thus closer to your current point, and thus closer (sooner in time).

5voSAqT.png

I suppose that for me, I tend to see time more spatially... though I see it as an element of a larger spatial object (the fabric of the universe, for instance) and that it moves through that, and in turn we move through that.

So the NJ prediction of Lenore's worked for me, but it didn't work for the INTP... he seems to have been just as confused as I was. I personally think it's a very confusing way of referring to time, and that there's a good reason I've never heard it used before.
 

Lexicon

Temporal Mechanic
Staff member
Joined
Sep 28, 2008
Messages
12,342
MBTI Type
JINX
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Multidimensional growing, living spiderweb. Ever forward.
 

Rail Tracer

Freaking Ratchet
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Messages
3,031
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
no really, i propose a far easier explanation:

in those calendars people put on the wall, a day earlier is "up" compared to a given day, and a day later is "down". Thus all these people mysteriously referring to meetings being moved "up" (earlier) and "down" (later).

HAH! That is how I see the explanation also. Up/forward would be going towards 1, down/backwards would be going towards 30/31

Bunch of headaches though, just give me a date.
 
Top