Intuitors are more grounded than sensors.

[miss fortune]

On the bright side, it's more pragmatic to hurt feelings by having fun than by being overly emotional. At least one ends up feeling amused, which makes it a win-lose situation, rather than a lose-lose.

Something INFXs might want to learn.

... but...but... tirades are FUN!

 

[Fluffywolf]

lol?

Pft, you should be able to understand what I meant, come on where's your inferior Fe!

What's more sad, someone with a certain biased opinion that tries to find and expand on their opinion by taking in and responding to critisism, or someone that just puts it out there but closes himself off from any critisism?

 

[Rasofy]

... but...but... tirades are FUN!

To watch, yes.

 

[miss fortune]

To watch, yes.

one can always hope and dream...

of course the best ones are free standing threads where everyone gets told where to stick it...

 

[The Great One]

popular belief is otherwise, i think its caused exactly due it being their weak side. Thus a sensitive matter.
To me it would seem sensors see everything through an imagination lense, and that they are so immersed in this life to the point of it becoming a game to them.

When i joke, sensors often think im all serious cause they lack the solid understanding of life that _no one_ is so stupid as what i act in sake of humour. (or maybe sensors are?)

And then dreams is another one, sensors seem to be trapped in them lika a simulation without the ability to realize its just a simulation, not life and death serious matter.

To me sensors seem like kids so immersed in the game they start believing it. Just like those game addicted kids who play all the time.

I think the sensor pride of "groundedness" is entirely unfounded, without any solid backbone to it, much like their many other delusions.

I mean, sensors wouldnt even realize what my laughing here means if they knew it.. No it doesnt mean this is a joke. It means.. That im usually always both serious and not the same time.

Well.. Objections? ~certified by me and approvingly sensorified for everyones understanding

Your theory is retarded. Intuition is imaginative in nature and lacks the sensing groundedness. Sensing doms seem like the most grounded types of all.

 

[RaptorWizard]

Your theory is retarded. Intuition is imaginative in nature and lacks the sensing groundedness. Sensing doms seem like the most grounded types of all.

This is all subjective. Though a stereotypical 'sensor' may see the immediately percpetible reality more clearly, the greater reality beyond our immendiate sense perceptions could be more clearly perceptible to stereotypical 'intutives' (and of course some sensors may do this better than some intuitives, and vice-versa, contrary to popular stereotype).

So before you can make such a judgment, we need to know what exactly what is meant by the word "grounded".

 

[The Great One]

This is all subjective. Though a stereotypical 'sensor' may see the immediately percpetible reality more clearly, the greater reality beyond our immendiate sense perceptions could be more clearly perceptible to stereotypical 'intutives' (and of course some sensors may do this better than some intuitives, and vice-versa, contrary to popular stereotype).

So before you can make such a judgment, we need to know what exactly what is meant by the word "grounded".

What I mean by grounded is that a person has a good concept of reality, what's going on around them, what's realistic, and the person doesn't live in fantasy land.

 

[Fluffywolf]

This is all subjective. Though a stereotypical 'sensor' may see the immediately percpetible reality more clearly, the greater reality beyond our immendiate sense perceptions could be more clearly perceptible to stereotypical 'intutives' (and of course some sensors may do this better than some intuitives, and vice-versa, contrary to popular stereotype).

So before you can make such a judgment, we need to know what exactly what is meant by the word "grounded".

Bit since the OP did not explain himself very well and doesn't seem eager to do so, all you can do is give him the benefit of the doubt (like I said in my first post in this topic). Or use your own imaginations.

Which means this discussion is effectively undiscussable, unless we bring in our own interpretations.

 

[Jaguar]

When i joke, sensors often think im all serious cause they lack the solid understanding of life that _no one_ is so stupid as what i act in sake of humour.

Clearly, this person never read INTJ123's posts.

 

[Xann]

Bit since the OP did not explain himself very well and doesn't seem eager to do so, all you can do is give him the benefit of the doubt (like I said in my first post in this topic). Or use your own imaginations.

Which means this discussion is effectively undiscussable, unless we bring in our own interpretations.

As is all discussion typology related.

 

[miss fortune]

As is all discussion typology related.

imaginary things can only be discussed by using one's imagination... NEVER!

 

[Fluffywolf]

As is all discussion typology related.

Far from it.

Only people that are unable to convey their own intentions and interpretations in a clear manner have that problem. If you intellectually explain what your intentions and interpretations are, you will not fall into these kinds of cesspools.

If I present an opinion and the way I constructed said opinion in a way that is understandable to you. You can of course still end up disagreeing, but you'll at least know what I meant. But that is entirely different to what is happening here. Here we have no idea what the OP really means, and thus the only thing we can do if we wish to give him the time to share our own thoughts, is by making assumptions.

 

[Tiltyred]

imaginary things can only be discussed by using one's imagination... NEVER!

Quel flash de news.

 

[King sns]

imaginary things can only be discussed by using one's imagination... NEVER!

hmmm, we should turn this over to that science guy on youtube who like describes all these vague fuzzy phenomenons in scientific terms. (How much does a shadow weigh?) etc.

 

[Il Morto Che Parla]

the OP makes me wish that I were (...) bosomy

We'll be the judge of that. Pics plz

 

[Fluffywolf]

We'll be the judge of that. Pics plz

Pillow fight!

 

[Il Morto Che Parla]

A real 'intuitive' is a psychological categorization I have no need as of now to label myself on a public Typology forum a part of.

Instead of spending half my time on this forum boasting how great it is to be 'intuitive', I actually take action and make posts in threads on the true nature of cosmology.

If you don't believe me, why don't you go and check out all the links in my signature, because after all, an open-minded 'intuitive' would question his initial assumptions.

Dude, it's not a competition. An MBTI "iNtutitive" is not a title of honour to be "earned" by making an effort to talk about cosmology.

 

[RaptorWizard]

Dude, it's not a competition. An MBTI "iNtutitive" is not a title of honour to be "earned" by making an effort to talk about cosmology.

Indeed, it's what they're born with, but I say it is competitive to use what you are born with to fulfill your destiny and make progress towards meaningful achievements.

 

[Il Morto Che Parla]

Indeed, it's what they're born with.

Ni or Ne are just CF's that we all have one of, as either Dom/Aux or Ter/Inf. So we are all "born with it".

To be an iNtuitive is just a style of processing and communicating information which favours that function above the sensing function.

It's not like us T's are "born without feelings" for example.

 

[Xann]

(sweeps sensors out of thread with broom to reveal beautiful intuitive groundedness, awaits my pal Vilku's return)