Eric B
ⒺⓉⒷ
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2008
- Messages
- 3,621
- MBTI Type
- INTP
- Enneagram
- 548
- Instinctual Variant
- sp/sx
Se: merges with the tangible environment
Si: frees tangible environment from association with irrelevant elements. (By storing pertinent facts)
Ne: merges with conceptual content (ego introjects self-visualized possibilities into environment)
Ni: frees conceptual content from association with irrelevant elements (zeroes in on most likely possibilities).
Te: merges with technical aspect of situations (ego's goals are logical efficiency)
Ti: frees technical content from its association with irrelevant elements (by focusing on particular frameworks).
Fe: merges with humane environments
Fi: frees humane content from association with irrelevant elements (by focusing on internal universal values).
Hence, the term "evaluation".
If you "intellectualize" things, trying to understand their essence, that connects to logical "value judgments". The "essence" of something is a sort of value (think numbers being filled into a data field or formula operation, which are called "values"); it's just a technical one, rather than a humane one, which "social" and "moral" judgments are.
Si: frees tangible environment from association with irrelevant elements. (By storing pertinent facts)
Ne: merges with conceptual content (ego introjects self-visualized possibilities into environment)
Ni: frees conceptual content from association with irrelevant elements (zeroes in on most likely possibilities).
Te: merges with technical aspect of situations (ego's goals are logical efficiency)
Ti: frees technical content from its association with irrelevant elements (by focusing on particular frameworks).
Fe: merges with humane environments
Fi: frees humane content from association with irrelevant elements (by focusing on internal universal values).
Perhaps that's because "values" has been so identified with Fi in popular typology usage. But all judgments deal in "values".I actually think I identify most with Fi, Si and Ne based on this. Maybe I just don't fully grasp Ti. I certainly intellectualize things, trying to understand their essence but I don't really see myself putting a value judgement on it, which I see as an F thing. On the other hand I do put value judgements on social and moral type things.
Hence, the term "evaluation".
If you "intellectualize" things, trying to understand their essence, that connects to logical "value judgments". The "essence" of something is a sort of value (think numbers being filled into a data field or formula operation, which are called "values"); it's just a technical one, rather than a humane one, which "social" and "moral" judgments are.