The sexiest type?

[MisterNi]

Any type that looks good in a nighty.

 

[EffEmDoubleyou]

I am an INTJ. So INTJ.

This should be perfectly clear.

 

[Amargith]

You look good in a nighty?

 

[Chloe]

EXFP girls and IXXX guys are sexiest to me, sometimes INT girls too...

 

[Dali]

Any type can be sexy but EFJ women & IFP/INTJ men hold that extra bit of of allure for me.

 

[Amargith]

Atm INTJs and ISTPs are driving me crazy *sigh*

 

[LEGERdeMAIN]

I'm the sexiest type.

 

[Aleksei]

lul why

By definition sensors don't think in an abstract manner, which puts them beyond most of my thought process. Additionally, sensors are statistically 27 times less likely to be of above-average intelligence than intuitors; and SFs in particular think in a subjective (maddening) manner on top of that. I get on very well with STPs, however, and at least two of my closest friends are xSTP.

 

[Arclight]

By definition sensors don't think in an abstract manner, which puts them beyond most of my thought process. Additionally, sensors are statistically 27 times less likely to be of above-average intelligence than intuitors; and SFs in particular think in a subjective (maddening) manner on top of that. I get on very well with STPs, however, and at least two of my closest friends are xSTP.

80% of statistics are made up on the spot..

What I am saying is.. do you have a source for that claim about sensors??

See the way I figure it.. If we are going on IQ .. then it would make sense that sensors would be more intelligent on average that Intuitives.
Sensors are fact based and grounded.. I never hear the the expression get your feet off the ground you numbskull. I often hear, get your head out of the clouds.
I am not arguing that either is more intelligent, only that this statistic sounds fishy because the very nature of testing intelligence would favor a well grounded sensor.

 

[Valiant]

Seriously. Heated discussion in a thread about sexiest type?
180+ posts?

You people really need to go read a book or something else worthwhile.
Didn't expect this thread to live past the week it was created before getting graveyarded.


jew

 

[Dali]

^

You know how I know you're ENTJ?

 

[JTG1984]

ENFP. Sensors can't follow my thinking, thinkers are too cold, and judgers are way too bossy and orderly for me.

The least sexy type? ESFJ, followed by ISFJ. SFs are goddamn morons, and SFJs are stubborn to boot.

Yeah you're right I'm way to smart for my own good, never could follow how you retards think.

 

[Aleksei]

80% of statistics are made up on the spot..

What I am saying is.. do you have a source for that claim about sensors??

Yes, but I couldn't furnish it immediately. It'd probably be the European Journal of Psychology, but I can't recall. Right off the bat though, I have this:

Other personality traits being the same, an iNtuitive person (one who grasps patterns and seeks possibilities) is 27 times more likely to have a high IQ than a Sensing person (one who focuses on sensory details and the here-and-now).
Again, other traits being the same, an Introverted person is 8 times more likely to have a high IQ than one who is Extraverted; a Thinking (logic-oriented) person is 2.5 times more likely to have a high IQ than a Feeling (people-oriented) person; and a Judging person (one who seeks closure) is about twice as likely to have a high IQ than a Perceiving person (one who likes to keep his options open).
Moreover, if you encounter an INTJ (Introverted, iNtuitive, Thinking, Judging), there is a 37% probability that his IQ places him in the top 2 percent of the population. The probability is 20% for an INTP, 15% for an INFJ, and 8% for an INFP. These four types account for 66% of the high-IQ population but only 6% of the total population.

 

[JoSunshine]

ESFJ men are like catnip to me They tend to be very "manly" in their demenor and are warm, friendly and shivilorous...I am especially drawn to the athetic ones which seems to be all of them.

Unfortunately their traditionalism and critical nature are an issue for me long term...but pure sex-appeal, ESFJ all the way.

 

[Arclight]

Yes, but I couldn't furnish it immediately. It'd probably be the European Journal of Psychology, but I can't recall. Right off the bat though, I have this:

Thanks.. That is pretty cool info.. and I admit I am surprised at the data presented.. I would have thought without a doubt that a sensor dominated world would accommodate a sensor thinking person.

Good stuff..

 

[BlackCat]

Yes, but I couldn't furnish it immediately. It'd probably be the European Journal of Psychology, but I can't recall. Right off the bat though, I have this:

That's from a blog... where's their source?

If you think about it, that blog probably got their information from a small scale study; which is unreliable. That's how most typology studies are made. Besides, they aren't even thinking in terms of the functions. Wouldn't the N doms have the highest IQ, if, by their logic, intuition makes someone the most intelligent out of the preferences? Most EN_Ps and IN_Js I've met have been insanely smart.

And another thing to think about, a lot of very intelligent people score as intuitive types because of how tests are made. Tests are unreliable, the only way that you would be able to make an actual study on MBTI types would be to get people who have studied type and everything about it. Not just find some random people and give them a test. That's a recipe for failure. I'm sure that a lot of these "INTJs" are just insanely smart ISTJs.

Personally, when I take the test I score as pretty much every I__P depending on my mood. If I was put in a study, I'd have to intentionally take the test with getting ISFP in mind, not how I actually am.

I personally think that the insane sensor bias here is just against people who aren't on par with the complainer's intellect, or they don't have similar kinds of intellect. Type doesn't really have to do with that. I mesh well with both sensors and intuitives who are smart, the preference doesn't really mean anything. It just makes conversations more interesting. The real divide is intelligence.

 

[Ginkgo]

 

[JTG1984]

ISFJ!

 

[Thalassa]

Ok - I posted here like a year ago, but I've changed my mind. I still think xSFPs are sexy, but also most definitely xNTJs.

I've also noticed that I'm attracted to INFP men when they're celebrities or something (Kurt Cobain, Ian Curtis) but not so much IRL, which is weird.

 

[Ginkgo]

I tried to destroy this thread will irradiated hot pockets. Don't make me bring in the nukes.