And I agree I don't have a particular preference toward N anything, doesn't mean it isn't still my dominant function.
What you're missing is what it means to have a function be dominant. It's not whether you have a particular preference. It's that the function's influence on your perception is so strong, and its approach to problems so familiar to you, that it affects your life experience in two preeminent ways.
First, you have no clue whatsoever that you prefer this function. I still have no freakin' clue what Ne is, how it shades my perception of the world, how it feels, etc. That's because there is nothing in my experience to compare it to. Nothing is as pervasive in my life.
Second, until you mature quite a bit, you have no idea that the way others experience things can be radically different from your own. Your dominant function, as far as you understand, defines
what it means to be human, or to be more precise, what makes humans what they are. As far as I understand it, the different perspective are as follows:
Ne: to be human is to understand what is wonderful about everything in the world
Ni: to be human is to know that what is and what seems to be are usually two very different things
Se: to be human is to appreciate everything that is beautiful about this world
Si: to be human is to know the difference between right and wrong
Fe: to be human is to take joy in everyone around you, and to share that joy with others
Fi: to be human is to constantly seek the meaning of things
Te: to be human is to remake the world for the better
Ti: to be human is to understand how everything fits together