• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Catch-22

Poki

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
10,436
MBTI Type
STP
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
What? How? And how does the math actually relate at all? And what happening with these matrices anyway?

From where I stand, the matrices are in-and-of themselves. Like a map, the Math proves it. You can go forward and backward. It becomes a framework. You can then merge other things into this framework like was done with functions in a previous post. Now lets take an 8x8 matrix. what can we do with it? Well we have 8 functions. We can create an 8x8 matrix with these functions and if we assign each function a number and place each in a place that corresponds to the number matrix then we have just merged the frameworks. Now what can we deduce, what can we prove. How well does it actually fit within this framework when we apply permeatations that works when we deal withi numbers? What if we rearrange Ti to be 5 instead of 2, then to get it all to work we must shift everything else as well. Why, because we have placed it within this framework and thats how this framewok works, wildcat already proved it.
 

ThatsWhatHeSaid

Well-known member
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
7,263
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w4
From where I stand, the matrices are in-and-of themselves. Like a map, the Math proves it. You can go forward and backward. It becomes a framework. You can then merge other things into this framework like was done with functions in a previous post. Now lets take an 8x8 matrix. what can we do with it? Well we have 8 functions. We can create an 8x8 matrix with these functions and if we assign each function a number and place each in a place that corresponds to the number matrix then we have just merged the frameworks. Now what can we deduce, what can we prove. How well does it actually fit within this framework when we apply permeatations that works when we deal withi numbers? What if we rearrange Ti to be 5 instead of 2, then to get it all to work we must shift everything else as well. Why, because we have placed it within this framework and thats how this framewok works, wildcat already proved it.

wat
 

Salomé

meh
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,527
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
It's not a proof; it's a poem.
 

Colombe Gris

New member
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
45
MBTI Type
INTJ
God I wish Ti was one of my main functions; this stuff looks like Chinese to me. I'm sure this is useful in some way, but I don't have the time or patience to find the key to this apparent treasure box. Mathematicians astound me.
 

Salomé

meh
Joined
Sep 25, 2008
Messages
10,527
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w4
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
whats the poem?
It's a poem in the sense that it means different things to different people. It doesn't have a definite shape. You find a proof; I find a challenge to the bimodal assumptions upon which MBTI is built. And a thousand and one other connections that make my brain buzz. That's the beauty of wildcat's posts. They work on so many levels. And the tease is just as delicious as the reveal. :)
 

Poki

New member
Joined
Dec 4, 2008
Messages
10,436
MBTI Type
STP
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
It's a poem in the sense that it means different things to different people. It doesn't have a definite shape. You find a proof; I find a challenge to the bimodal assumptions upon which MBTI is built. And a thousand and one other connections that make my brain buzz. That's the beauty of wildcat's posts. They work on so many levels. And the tease is just as delicious as the reveal. :)

ok, fine...I will reword it "subjective proof" :rolleyes: INTPs :D
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
It's a poem in the sense that it means different things to different people. It doesn't have a definite shape. You find a proof; I find a challenge to the bimodal assumptions upon which MBTI is built. And a thousand and one other connections that make my brain buzz. That's the beauty of wildcat's posts. They work on so many levels. And the tease is just as delicious as the reveal. :)
Thanks Morgan Le Fay. A good post. :)
And a strikingly accurate observation: There is not a definite shape.

01234
12345
23456
34567
45678

We cut the vertical/horizontal m at both ends:
(23456)

The original line is
horizontally 012345678
and vertically

0
1
2
3
5
5
6
7
8

including + vertical

0
12
234
3456
45678
5678
678
78
8

_ _ _ _ 0
_ _ _ 0 1 2
_ _ 0 1 2 3 4
_ 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
_ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
_ _ 4 5 6 7 8
_ _ _ 6 7 8
_ _ _ _ 8

The turn rounds not only vertically and horizontally.
There is the counter and the anticounter.
Again we shift.
We inward the outward, and we outward the inward.
Russian dolls.

It is as you say. ;)
 
Last edited:

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
How does the math relate at all?
A good question.

0
1
2
3
45678

we had two lines

4 - 4 = 0
5 - 3 = 2
6 - 2 = 4
7 - 1 = 6
8 - 0 = 8

we have

0
12
234
3456
45678

we had

+

4
2
0

-

0
2
4

we have

01234
1234
234
34
4


25 = 1 + 3 + 5 +7 + 9

we have

0 X T(1) = 0

check

1 X 9
2 X 8
3 X 7
4 X 6
5 X 5

25
24
21
16
09
00

1 = 25 - 24
3 = 24 - 21
5 = 21 - 16
7 = 16 - 09
9 = 09 - 00

we had the dichotomy of T(1)

13579
97531

we have the dichotomy of 11
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
T in the loci

2 + 4 = 6
24 + (T)24 = 66
66 = (T)66

24 = 4 X 6 = 3 X 8 = 8 + 12 + 4

in loci

232
343
232

= 24

nine loci

24 + 9 = 42 - 9 = 66/2

we had

232
343
232

we have

2 + 2
3 + 2
2 + 2
3 + 2
4 + 2
3 + 2
2 + 2
3 + 2
2 + 2

454
565
454 =

(T)24 in the loci
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
3 & 9

3 + T(1) = 9 + 4

A.

Introduction of (T)1

9 + 1 = 6 + 4

91 - 64 = 3 X 9 = 9 X 3 = 27

2 + 7 = 9
-2 + 7 = 5

297 = 951 - 654 = 3 X 99 = 99 X 3 = 270 + 27

check

270 = 465 - 195 = (930/2) - (390/2)

27 = (T) 195 - (T) 465





B.

Introduction of 4

we have 2

2/4

05

0 + 5 = 5

2 - 5 = - 3

5 - 5 = 0 X 9
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
we had 2

we have 2 + 4 = 6

6/4

15 = 5 + (T)1

1 + 5 = 6 = 5 + 1

6 - 6 = 0 = - 3 + 3

15 - 6 = 1 X 9
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
we had 6

we have 6 + 4 = 10

10/4

25 = 15 + (T)1

2 + 5 = 7 = 6 + 1

10 - 7 = 3

25 - 7 = 2 X 9
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
we had 10

we have 10 + 4 = 14

14/4

35 = 25 + (T)1

3 + 5 = 8 = 7 + 1

14 - 8 = 3 + 3

35 - 8 = 3 X 9

= 27
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
What is the type you would describe as bland?
If many types come under this category, which is the most bland?
And what are the other ones?
 

wildcat

New member
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
3,622
MBTI Type
INTP
If the lock is closed, let it be closed.
The closed lock does serve a purpose.

You do not solve the riddle.
The riddle takes care of itself.
Only when you are ready.
 
Top