## User Tag List

1. Originally Posted by lastrailway
What if, instead of dividing, you multiply?

Ie:

22/2 = 11
22*11 = 242
T(242) = 242
T(X) = X
T = X

(which of course happens with all multiples of 11).

242-11 = 231
231/11=21
Since we first used 2 and 11:
(T(231)/2)/11 = 6
Or ((T(231))*2)+11=23

So it can be anything from Catch-21 to Catch-23.
Thank you, lastrailway!

I say very interesting. A good point. I shall be back.

2. Essential numbers, lastrailway! A good concept.

100 - 23 = 77
11 - (1 X 1) = 0 + 10

00 10 18 24 28 30 30 28 24 18 10 00
10 08 06 04 02 00 -2 etc

(30 - 2) + X
= (100 - 23)

3. With X being ((100-23)/11)^2?

You could go with prime numbers.
22-1=21
22-2=20
22-3=19
22-5=17
22-7=15
22-11=11
22-13=9
22-17=5
22-19=3

21,20,19,17,15,11,9,5,3
SUM = 120

(120-22)/7=14

14, 24, 32, 38, 42, 44, 44, 42, 38, 32, 24, 14

44-14=30

(30-2)+X= (100-23)

4. Originally Posted by lastrailway
With X being ((100-23)/11)^2?

You could go with prime numbers.
22-1=21
22-2=20
22-3=19
22-5=17
22-7=15
22-11=11
22-13=9
22-17=5
22-19=3

21,20,19,17,15,11,9,5,3
SUM = 120

(120-22)/7=14

14, 24, 32, 38, 42, 44, 44, 42, 38, 32, 24, 14

44-14=30

(30-2)+X= (100-23)
Yes. A perfect match.
Beautiful work, lastrailway, as always.
X is in the locker.

5. Victor labelled a thread: Typology without MBTI.
A valid proposition? Let us look into the matter.

The medial number of the function order = 9/2 = 4,5
but we are advised to remove the mark:

T(9)/2 = 45

Eysenck was a statistician. Statistics is a one-set.
Extravert - Introvert. Two types.
He never removed beyond the one-set. Not even when he added another set:
Stable - Unstable.
He was not wrong. Only circumscribed. And thereby useful.
However:

Extravert-Introvert: A one-set. Two types.
Add Stable-Unstable: A two-set. Four types.
Add Emotive-Non-Emotive: A three-set. Eight types.
MBTI: A four-set. 16 types.

T(9) = 90
T(9)/2 = T(38) - 38 = 45

T(9 X 9) = T(24) - 24 = 64 - T(64)

6. I try to illustrate.

Say we have loci 1 X 1
Number in loci = 0(1 X 1)

We have number of loci 2 X 2
Number in loci = 1(2 X 2)

Number of loci = 3 X 3
Number in loci = 2(3 x 3)

Number of loci = 4 X 4
Number in loci: 3(4 X 4)

Number of loci = 5 X 5 (this one we had).
Number in loci = 4(5 x 5)

Number of loci = 6 X 6
Number in loci = 5(6 X 6)

Number of loci = 7 X 7
Number in loci = 6(7 X 7)
= T(492)

7. Let us recede to zero. In loci.

0(1 X 1) = 0

1(2 X 2) in loci:

00
11

+

01
01

2(3 X 3) in loci:

010
121
232

+

002
002
002

3(4 X 4) in loci = (+ inclusion of T(1):

0110
1221
2332
3443

+

0013
0013
0013
0013

8. 4(5 X 5) = T(1) + T(2) + T(3) + T(4)

1 = 9 - 8
2 = 9 - 7
3 = 9 - 6
4 = 9 - 5 U turn:

1234
8765 U turn:

1234
2345

T(1) = (1 X 8) + (2 X 1)

T(2) = (2 x 7) + (3 X 2)

T(3) = (3 X 6) + (4 X 3)

T(4) = (4 X 5) + (5 X 4)

Dichotomy in loci:

01210
12321
23432
34543
45654

+

00024
00024
00024
00024
00024

9. l = number of loci
n = number in loci

0123456789 .. ten loci. 0-9 to 1-10

0(1 X 1) = n
1 X 1 = l

Zero is.
Otherwise we'd have no zero.

1 = (1 X 1)
0 = 0(1 X 1)

Primary l does not number:

01 001 000
02 004 004
03 009 018
04 016 048
05 025 100

06 036 180
07 049 294
08 064 448
09 081 648
10 100 900

100 = 19 + 17 +15 + 13 +11 + 09 + 07 + 05 + 03 + 01
5 X 2 = 10
T(2) = (19 + 1) = (17 + 3) = (15 + 5) = (13 + 7) = (11 + 9)
U-turn = 11 + 9
100 - 81 = 19 etc.
> 3 = 4 - 1

10. The illusion of the number increasing from the medial point (m)

09 18 27 36 45 54 63 72 81 90

9 + 9 = 18
18 + 18 = 36
27 + 27 = 54
36 + 36 = 72
45 + 45 = 90

m = 90

54 + 54 = 18 + m
63 + 63 = 36 + m
72 + 72 = 54 + m
81 + 81 = 72 + m
90 + 90 = m + m

54 + 54 = 108
63 + 63 = 126

126 + m = 108 + 108
A metathesis.

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO