## User Tag List

1. For frick's sake. Can we get another INTP in here to translate? I can't understand your super computer coding amidst a series of tubes. It's like running ground meat through different meat grinders a few more times.

I've actually been made curious, but make the mind pain stop

2. Thank you Mystic Tater.
The A complements in the linear. However, we are in the lookout to find the C.
We only need the A to find it.
The loci for functions is found in the C alone.

The C is definitively unlinear. This is exactly what I was trying to say in the posts I wrote today.
It is the C is where you find the types. Therefore axiomwise, MBTI is entirely unlinear.
Here we have the linear (A) and the unlinear (C) in the loci. Differentiated in the equation by odd numbers for C.

3. Originally Posted by wildcat
Thank you Mystic Tater.
The A complements in the linear. However, we are in the lookout to find the C.
We only need the A to find it.
The loci for functions is found in the C alone.

The C is definitively unlinear. This is exactly what I was trying to say in the posts I wrote today.
It is the C is where you find the types. Therefore axiomwise, MBTI is entirely unlinear.
Here we have the linear (A) and the unlinear (C) in the loci. Differentiated in the equation by odd numbers for C.
The types are not linear because they are multidimensional. The are composite and expose themselves in different imminences as you look at them in different angles. If they were linear, then what strange worldviews we could have. However, we have given them a linear format by putting them on paper, which is entirely unfitting.

I could be off but this is my interpretation.

4. Originally Posted by Unkindloving
For frick's sake. Can we get another INTP in here to translate? I can't understand your super computer coding amidst a series of tubes. It's like running ground meat through different meat grinders a few more times.

I've actually been made curious, but make the mind pain stop
OK I try again.

Say we have axioms N,S,P and R.

N complements S
P compements R
and vice versa.
In straight lines.

NP complements SR
PN complements RS
PS complements RN
SP complements NR
and vice versa.
Not in straight lines.

It is the idea of MBTI. The loci for functions, and therefore for the types, is off the road.
Mystic Tater pointed out the dispostion in his essay on the matrix.

A: Straight lines
C: Not straight lines.

A

04444
44444
44444
44444
44448

C

44444
14444
44444
44447
44444

0 + 8 = 1 + 7

5. Originally Posted by Mystic Tater
The types are not linear because they are multidimensional. The are composite and expose themselves in different imminences as you look at them in different angles. If they were linear, then what strange worldviews we could have. However, we have given them a linear format by putting them on paper, which is entirely unfitting.

I could be off but this is my interpretation.
This is exactly it. I could not have said it as well.
Very good. Thank you.

6. Originally Posted by Mystic Tater
The types are not linear because they are multidimensional. The are composite and expose themselves in different imminences as you look at them in different angles. If they were linear, then what strange worldviews we could have. However, we have given them a linear format by putting them on paper, which is entirely unfitting.

I could be off but this is my interpretation.
This is why the world needs more Tater.

7. Yes. The world needs more Tater.

DICHOTOMY OF A

By the primary axioms, clockwise A B C D, we reach the secondary axioms,
clockwise a b c d.

DXXXA
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
CXXXB

XXdXX
XXXXX
cXXXa
XXXXX
XXbXX

We now differentiate quantity and quality. 1a. Dichotomy of A:
If the vertical declension represents quantity, the horizontal declension represents quality.
Parallely, vice versa. One or the other. Not one and the other.

Vertical declension: Quality:
Horizontal declension: Quantity:

XXXXA
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX

100 =

44444
44444
44444
44444
44444

=

01234
12345
23456
12345
01234

+

44444
22222
00000
00000
00000

1b.

100 =

44444
44444
44444
44444
44444

=

00024
00024
00024
00024
00024

+

45654
34543
23432
12321
01210

We had vertical declension to represent quantity. Horizontal d. to represent quality.

8. A word before I go on.

100 =

86420
86420
86420
86420
86420

8 - 4 = 4
6 - 4 = 2
4 - 4 = 0

2 - 4 below zero etc. Numbers missing.

44444
22222
00000
00000
00000

parallelly in a diverse dichotomy of A

00024
00024
00024
00024
00024

9. What does not show is on the other side. Exclusion complements inclusion.

01234
12345
23456
12345
01234

representing the declension of quality in the dichotomy of A. (1a)

The Dichotomy of B

XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXX
XXXXB

100 =

44444
44444
44444
44444
44444

=

01210
12321
23432
34543
45654

+

00024
00024
00024
00024
00024

alternatively

100 =

44444
44444
44444
44444
44444

=

00000
00000
00000
22222
44444

+

01234
12345
23456
12345
01234

One process. Two dichotomies.

10. The dichotomy of C.

C = - A

check

A:

45654
34543
23432
12321
01210

+

00024
00024
00024
00024
00024

or

44444
22222
00000
00000
00000

+

01234
12345
23456
12345
01234

C:

43210
54321
65432
54321
43210

+

00000
00000
00000
22222
44444

or

01210
12321
23432
34543
45654

+

42000
42000
42000
42000
42000

check

45654
34543
23432
12321
01210

-

01210
12321
23432
34543
45654

= 0

check

4 - 0 = 5 - 1 = 6 - 2 = 5 - 1 = 4 - 0 = 4

3 - 1 = 4 - 2 = 5 - 3 = 4 - 2 = 3 - 1 = 2

2 - 2 = 3 - 3 = 4 - 4 = 3 - 3 = 2 - 2 = 0

And the potential missing numbers surface:

1 - 3 = 2 - 4 = 3 - 5 = 2 - 4 = 1 - 3 = - 2

0 - 4 = 1 - 5 = 2 - 6 = 1 - 5 = 0 - 4 = - 4

check

44444
22222
00000
00000
00000

-

00000
00000
00000
22222
44444

= 0

42000
42000
42000
42000
42000

-

00024
00024
00024
00024
00024

= 0

#### Posting Permissions

• You may not post new threads
• You may not post replies
• You may not post attachments
• You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO