Would God be a perfect INTJ?

[Arclight]

So much arrogance in this thread.
Seriously we're a bunch of hairless apes who if the power went off would be dead within a week.

But we are going to start typing God are we?

Very well then.. God sees all and knows all .. God is everywhere and everything to everyone.
He transcends type obviously. XXXX oh and add a few more XXXXXXXXXXX

If God and Humans were numbers . humans would equal .00000000000000000000000000000000000001
God is infinite.

If human stupidity was a number , this thread proves it's infinite.

Here is a question.. what came first, God or INTJs??

 

[Ming]

1. Is God even real?

If it isn't, then INTJs should shut their traps.


2. If God is real, and IF God was an INTJ, thus are INTJs real?

3. If God wasn't an INTJ, then what is he?

4. If God was an INTJ, then does that mean he's a f*cked up idiot to have created everyone else? Is he stupid or something?

5. If he wasn't, then he can't be an INTJ.

6. Thus no matter how you see it, God can't be INTJ.

Thus, INTJs should still shut their traps.

 

[Ming]

Anyways, I'll cut off this quote from personalitypage website...

INTJ Weaknesses

* Not naturally in tune with others feelings; may be insensitive at times
* May tend to respond to conflict with logic and reason, rather than the desired emotional support
* Not naturally good at expressing feelings and affections
* Tendency to believe that they're always right
* Tendency to be unwilling or unable to accept blame
* Their constant quest to improve everything may be taxing on relationships
* Tend to hold back part of themselves

Exactly. (Though, not to say, I believe INTJ strengths are seriously wonderful. Now that I think of it, getting one isn't too bad of an idea either )

 

[Arclight]

1. Is God even real?

If it isn't, then INTJs should shut their traps.


2. If God is real, and IF God was an INTJ, thus are INTJs real?

3. If God wasn't an INTJ, then what is he?

4. If God was an INTJ, then does that mean he's a f*cked up idiot to have created everyone else? Is he stupid or something?

5. If he wasn't, then he can't be an INTJ.

6. Thus no matter how you see it, God can't be INTJ.

Thus, INTJs should still shut their traps.

This is in the running for post of the year!!!

 

[Lex Talionis]

1. Is God even real?

If it isn't, then INTJs should shut their traps.


2. If God is real, and IF God was an INTJ, thus are INTJs real?

3. If God wasn't an INTJ, then what is he?

4. If God was an INTJ, then does that mean he's a f*cked up idiot to have created everyone else? Is he stupid or something?

5. If he wasn't, then he can't be an INTJ.

6. Thus no matter how you see it, God can't be INTJ.

Thus, INTJs should still shut their traps.

1. Are you even real?

If you aren't, then homosexuals should just shut their traps.

2. If you were real, and IF you were a homosexual male, are homosexual males real?

3. If you aren't a homosexual male, then what the are you?

4. If you were a homosexual male, then doesn't that mean that you were a f*cked up idiot for being different from everyone else? Are you stupid or something?

5. If you weren't, then that means you can't be a homosexual.

6. Thus, no matter how you look at it, you can't be homosexual.

 

[Arclight]

1. Are you even real?

If you aren't, then homosexuals should just shut their traps.

2. If you were real, and IF you were a homosexual male, are homosexual males real?

3. If you aren't a homosexual male, then what the are you?

4. If you were a homosexual male, then doesn't that mean that you were a f*cked up idiot for being different from everyone else? Are you stupid or something?

5. If you weren't, then that means you can't be a homosexual.

6. Thus, no matter how you look at it, you can't be homosexual.

This isn't...

 

[Night]

1. Are you even real?

If you aren't, then homosexuals should just shut their traps.

2. If you were real, and IF you were a homosexual male, are homosexual males real?

3. If you aren't a homosexual male, then what the are you?

4. If you were a homosexual male, then doesn't that mean that you were a f*cked up idiot for being different from everyone else? Are you stupid or something?

5. If you weren't, then that means you can't be a homosexual.

6. Thus, no matter how you look at it, you can't be homosexual.

Stupid.

I get your point; I'm just not sure why it was relevant to develop a contrast with homosexuality. I guess you were just looking for an effective analogue?

Not a powerful rebuttal.

 

[Arclight]

Stupid.

I get your point; I'm just not sure why it was relevant to develop a contrast with homosexuality. I guess you were just looking for an effective analogue.

Not a powerful rebuttal.

The poster Ming is openly gay.. It's not like I don't get what Lex is trying to do either.. But he got kinda flustered there and took a non personal post and made it very personal.

 

[Night]

The poster Ming is openly gay.. It's not like I don't get what Lex is trying to do either.. But he got kinda flustered there and took a non personal post and made it very personal.

No, I got that. Ming has made it pretty obvious that he's homosexual.

Just seems like a sucker punch to cultivate a comparison between something as intimate as sexual preference with something as cheap as an online spitting match.

 

[tcda]

I feel bad for my friend who is a homosexual INTJ...he just got told to shut up by Ming, and then by Lex in his rebuttal to Ming.

actually, I don't feel sorry for him and he isn't even aware of the forum, but, you get my point.

 

[EJCC]

So much arrogance in this thread.
Seriously we're a bunch of hairless apes who if the power went off would be dead within a week.

But we are going to start typing God are we?

Very well then.. God sees all and knows all .. God is everywhere and everything to everyone.
He transcends type obviously. XXXX oh and add a few more XXXXXXXXXXX

If God and Humans were numbers . humans would equal .00000000000000000000000000000000000001
God is infinite.

If human stupidity was a number , this thread proves it's infinite.

Here is a question.. what came first, God or INTJs??

True this.

Why is it that the most sensible posts on this thread are ignored?

 

[miss fortune]

seriously, I made a great theological argument

 

[Night]

True this.

Why is it that the most sensible posts on this thread are ignored?

The OP does a great job alienating serious inquiry. So, right off the bat, it's tempting to respond with equally vapid nonsense.

My question is straightforward and should only be answered within the confines of the aforementioned specifications. Also, I am not concerned by any real or perceived "flaws" and/or limitations within MBTI itself, and am only asking your opinion in accord with the Myers-Briggs typology system.

My answer: Yes.

 

[Arclight]

No, I got that. Ming has made it pretty obvious that he's homosexual.

Just seems like a sucker punch to cultivate a comparison between something as intimate as sexual preference with something as cheap as an online spitting match.

I get that too..

My point is more that Ming made a post that was not directed at anyone in particular and Lex did. Therefore Ming was being general, non personally offensive and it could argued he making a joke.
I find his post no more offensive than a thread that says NF's are not funny, SP are all horny or SJ's are all boring. I might not agree, but no one person is being singled out and to some extent typing people is about stereotyping by the very nature of the word "type".

Lex actually proved Ming's other post correct.. the one that talks about INTJs lesser qualities.

 

[Night]

Lex actually proved Ming's other post correct.. the one that talks about INTJs lesser qualities.

Yeah, I noticed that, too.

 

[EJCC]

The OP does a great job alienating serious inquiry. So, right off the bat, it's tempting to respond with equally vapid nonsense.

Oh my god I missed that part of the OP somehow! That's insane.

I guess I should just give up then... ...sigh...

 

[Arclight]

True this.

Why is it that the most sensible posts on this thread are ignored?

You are not ignoring it.

 

[EJCC]

You are not ignoring it.

Well, that implies that yours is the single most sensible! Might I suggest that yours be tied with mine? In the top five, at least?

 

[Lex Talionis]

Can nobody enjoy an attempt at making a point peppered with sardonic splendour and in deadpan style anymore?

The PC police immediately steps out of the commissariat...

 

[Arclight]

Well, that implies that yours is the single most sensible! Might I suggest that yours be tied with mine? In the top five, at least?

Good point! I should have said them not it.. It's not like I didn't notice you said Posts and not post..