• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Si and Ni - how to tell the difference?

Haphazard

Don't Judge Me!
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
6,704
MBTI Type
ENFJ
Other tiebreakers...Most Si's know where they park at malls, where they put their keys, why they store things where they store them, etc.

Hmm. I must be an ISJ, then because I'm the only one in my family who can ever remember where we parked. However, why I store things where I store them usually turns out to be "because it was convenient at the time," but I can still always find them...
 

Skyward

Badoom~
Joined
Jul 3, 2008
Messages
1,084
MBTI Type
infj
Enneagram
9w1
Si also uses a LOT of simple, rigid cause and effect terms while Ni uses blanket ones:

NTJ vs STJ example
Si: Shooting a gun at someone in the head will kill them. Shooting them in the stomach will cause a slow, painful death if not treated. Shooting them in the foot will not kill them, but it will give them a limp.
Ni: Shooting a gun at someone will hit them with a lot of force in a small area, if the force hits them in the right spot, they will die. If I do it right, they wont die instantly, but slowly.

NFJ vs SFJ example
Si: Doing things for people makes them happy, which is good. It makes me feel good for others to feel good. I like when people rely on me, then I can do more good things for them.
Ni: Doing things for other people can make them happy, but doing it too much may make them rely on me. I'll be nice to a person if I think it will do them good, but who knows? If I'm not quite sure I probably won't bother.

Hmm. I must be an ISJ, then because I'm the only one in my family who can ever remember where we parked. However, why I store things where I store them usually turns out to be "because it was convenient at the time," but I can still always find them...

Everyone has a balance between S and N and introversion and extroversion. Simple as that :)

And I do the same with storage: It may LOOK disorganize, but in my mind its all perfectly where I left them so it IS organized.
 

Haphazard

Don't Judge Me!
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
6,704
MBTI Type
ENFJ
The way I explained it once was it was a bit like quick digestion before, or slow digestion after... like Si is the snake and Ni the spider.
 

SolitaryWalker

Tenured roisterer
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
3,504
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
so/sx

Does anyone else agree with this? I'm definitely the latter.


Uberfuhrer refers to Si dominant or auxiliary types, and Ni dominant or auxiliary types, and not just all types that either have Ni or Si as their four functions.

The longing that he speaks of is to be attributed to the intellectual intensity of the Ni type. It is not specific to the Ni type, it could be found in all N types, especially the INs. If you are an Intuitive, you certainly are more likely to identify with uberfuhrer'r description of the Ni type rather than the Si type.
 

pippi

New member
Joined
Sep 6, 2008
Messages
735
MBTI Type
xxxx
Si is memories, Ni is imagination.
Si is rules you live by, Ni is the voices in your head telling you what to do.
 
B

beyondaurora

Guest
Uberfuhrer refers to Si dominant or auxiliary types, and Ni dominant or auxiliary types, and not just all types that either have Ni or Si as their four functions.

The longing that he speaks of is to be attributed to the intellectual intensity of the Ni type. It is not specific to the Ni type, it could be found in all N types, especially the INs. If you are an Intuitive, you certainly are more likely to identify with uberfuhrer'r description of the Ni type rather than the Si type.

:blush:

:worthy:
 

Kollin

New member
Joined
Nov 20, 2008
Messages
112
MBTI Type
INXP
Si:compares past experiences to present objectively
Ni:constency in ideas and thoughts...thru internal framework...personal 'aha' moments.



I didn't read the whole thread so I don't know if someone already posted this...
 

Frank

New member
Joined
Mar 13, 2008
Messages
689
The first step to understanding the problem correctly and easily is to see that Si types are not the SJ's in general, but ISTP ISFP ESTJ ESFJ (thus changing the S/N axis gives the correspondent intuitive group - INTP INFP ENTJ ENFJ). Then you will notice how all of them prefer to relate descriptions of physical(if ISTP or ESTJ) or emotional(if ISFP or ESFJ) phenomena to systems (cause-effect systems) that are "direct" and "immediately observable". Ni types instead relate physical (if INTP or ENTJ) and emotional (if INFP or ENFJ) phenomena to systems that are "symbolic" or "abstract". If it's an example that you need, I will give you one of ENTJ and ESTJ.

First, where an ESTJ strategy is successful and an ENTJ strategy is not:
ESTJ: "My tooth is aching because I have eaten sugary food"
ENTJ: "My tooth is aching because of the conjugate action of a quantity of self-replicating bacteria interacting with each other"
Then, where an ENTJ strategy is successful and an ESTJ is not:
ESTJ: "The stock market went up because they decided to bail out GM"
ENTJ: "The stock market went up because of the systematic expectations of the agents on the behavior of their neighboring agents, which is in line with what was predicted by the diffusion model"

Your first step is wrong
 

Haphazard

Don't Judge Me!
Joined
Apr 14, 2008
Messages
6,704
MBTI Type
ENFJ
I think Frank may be referring to Socionics... but didn't use proper notation.
 

The Ü™

Permabanned
Joined
May 26, 2007
Messages
11,910
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Si is rules you live by, Ni is the voices in your head telling you what to do.

Wrong.

I think Frank may be referring to Socionics... but didn't use proper notation.

And really, I don't understand why more people don't. It makes it far easier to understand Jung's ideas. Modern MBTI just muddles them.

Why melancholy? Why longing?

Ni is the quintessential dreamer. And a melancholy look is often present in their eyes. Si, by contrast, often look calm and passive.
 

Cimarron

IRL is not real
Joined
Aug 21, 2008
Messages
3,417
MBTI Type
ISTJ
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/so
The way I explained it once was it was a bit like quick digestion before, or slow digestion after... like Si is the snake and Ni the spider.
Hmm, that comparison might work...
 

Athenian200

Protocol Droid
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
8,828
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
4w5
But longing and melancholy mean no motion. Where are the dreams that inspire action? Does a 'quintessential dreamer' not have those?

Not without Fe and Te. Those are what inspire action, in either Ni or Si types.

Ni would simply dream without acting on it, getting lost in itself... Si would simply be passive and complacent. I assume.
 

The Ü™

Permabanned
Joined
May 26, 2007
Messages
11,910
MBTI Type
INTJ
Enneagram
5w6
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
But longing and melancholy mean no motion. Where are the dreams that inspire action? Does a 'quintessential dreamer' not have those?

By melancholy, I meant sad, dreamy look in the eyes, I wasn't talking about temperament.

Pure Ni by itself just muses upon fantasies, independent of direct sensory stimuli.
 

Athenian200

Protocol Droid
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
8,828
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
4w5
Ni is the quintessential dreamer. And a melancholy look is often present in their eyes.

I doubt this applies to how normal INJs use Ni, but rather to how Ni would behave by itself if it had no other function to work with. Thus, your definition is purely hypothetical and useless from the practical standpoint of assessing type.

It makes sense from a purely functional model oriented standpoint, but it tells us nothing about how Ni is used or applied by NJs.
 

FDG

pathwise dependent
Joined
Aug 13, 2007
Messages
5,903
MBTI Type
ENTJ
Enneagram
7w8
Your first step is wrong

No, it cannot be wrong - it's MBTI that doesn't make any sense in respect to functional ordering. I don't think we can refer to "socionics" or "mbti", it's simply generally wrong to say that ISTJs and ISFJs have a dominant perceiving function - they're J types! The best theories are those that are most parsimonious while still adhering to reality; MBTI has to introduce an ad-hoc hypothesis of introverts switching functions that, if they got their ordering correct, wouldn't be necessary at all.
 
Top