• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Taking MBTT too seriously

snegledmaca

New member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
145
Uhm, is it me or do some people here seem to take MBTT a little too seriously?
 

Siúil a Rúin

when the colors fade
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
14,037
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
496
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Uhm, is it me or do some people here seem to take MBTT a little too seriously?
I'm thinking it's not you. :hug:

But oh my yes. You hit the nail on the head, toots. It's a theory, not a fact, interesting, but not falsifiable, and therefore not scientific. That's why I really appreciate that this new site doesn't require a field to declare type. Having to wade through the stereotypes associated with whichever type you declare yourself to be is very much like trudging through a field knee-deep in cow patties. A habit can develop in which people's words are twisted to fit the expectations of whatever type the reader is assuming them to possess. IMO it's very important on an MBTI site to have critics and threads exploring the limitations of the system.
 

Siúil a Rúin

when the colors fade
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
14,037
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
496
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Here are a couple of links to threads on other forums critiquing the system.

INTPcentral

INTPcentral

philosophyforums

It is considered pop psychology. The dogmatic approach to it is also pseudo-intellectualism. The stereotyping of people to the extent that certain behaviors are expected of them based on their type with the assumption that there is nothing they can do to change it, has gone beyond reason. That is pristine prejudice. It isn't even close to Jung's original theories. People use it as a way to simplify the world and justify ideas that otherwise have no justification.

It's an interesting theory and I enjoy learning about it and analyzing it. More than that I enjoy critiquing it as a way to balance its apparently natural tendency towards prejudicial thinking. People appear to forget that prejudice towards races and cultures were often justified with pseudo-science throughout the twentieth century.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,187
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
It's an interesting theory and I enjoy learning about it and analyzing it. More than that I enjoy critiquing it as a way to balance its apparently natural tendency towards prejudicial thinking. People appear to forget that prejudice towards races and cultures were often justified with pseudo-science throughout the twentieth century.

btw, we're looking for a few mods for PhrenologyCentral -- anyone interested?
 

Siúil a Rúin

when the colors fade
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
14,037
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
496
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
btw, we're looking for a few mods for PhrenologyCentral -- anyone interested?
I'd probably end up putting a few extra dents in some skulls which would make the system less objective and scientific. :doh: Better pass.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,187
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
I'd probably end up putting a few extra dents in some skulls which would make the system less objective and scientific. :doh: Better pass.

Ha -- Exactly what I would expect a melancholic endomorph to say!!
 

Xander

Lex Parsimoniae
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
4,463
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
9w8
It seems to me that most of the criticism against the MBTI theories are that people misuse it and therefore it must be diminished. That doesn't make sense. Merely teach it better surely?
 

Siúil a Rúin

when the colors fade
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
14,037
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
496
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
It seems to me that most of the criticism against the MBTI theories are that people misuse it and therefore it must be diminished. That doesn't make sense. Merely teach it better surely?
From what I understand that is a big part of it. The other issue is that the theory is not falsifiable. Because of that it cannot be subjected to the scientific process. It is theory, not fact, and should be treated accordingly.
 

Xander

Lex Parsimoniae
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
4,463
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
9w8
From what I understand that is a big part of it. The other issue is that the theory is not falsifiable. Because of that it cannot be subjected to the scientific process. It is theory, not fact, and should be treated accordingly.

No psychology nor philosophy is scientifically proven. Neither is quantum physics proven. How far does something have to be proven before it is relied upon?

Do you stop with the rope bridge or insist on the golden gate to cross each ravine?

(Note I'm not meaning to attack, just make a point about how relative reliability and proof is.)
 

Alienclock

New member
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
118
MBTI Type
infp
No psychology nor philosophy is scientifically proven. Neither is quantum physics proven. How far does something have to be proven before it is relied upon?

Do you stop with the rope bridge or insist on the golden gate to cross each ravine?

(Note I'm not meaning to attack, just make a point about how relative reliability and proof is.)

I think things ought to be proven before they are relied upon... But thats my opinion, its also my humble opinion that much of psychology and philosophy could be considered "nonsense"... In the sense that some years ago homosexuality was considered an illness. Now they've changed that to reflect popular opinion... As for quantum physics, I can't speak much about that... I imagine they have done some experiments that utilize quantum theory and have had some kind of consistent results... But theory is theory...

I think people take mbti way way too seriously...:)
Of course we all have different opinions on this one. :)

Ha -- Exactly what I would expect a melancholic endomorph to say!!
lol
 

Xander

Lex Parsimoniae
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
4,463
MBTI Type
INTP
Enneagram
9w8
I think things ought to be proven before they are relied upon...
"What is now proved was once impossible" ~ William Blake.

You know that the world doesn't work out according to a singular persons understanding of logic and yet they refuse stoically to try and predict the illogical.

Ergo MBTI may not be science. So what? Does it work for you? You can only really answer that if you investigate it's premises and trust in it at least for experiments. Of course your results are also only ever as good as your experiments but that's a different argument.
 

red13

New member
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
40
MBTI Type
INTJ
It's a theory, not a fact, interesting, but not falsifiable, and therefore not scientific.

Virtually everything in life is a theory rather than a fact. Most "facts" will probably be overturned in the future as understanding gets deeper e.g. flat Earth, Sun revolves around the Earth etc.

Having said that I also believe that the MBTI can be demonstrated scientifically. You come up with a hypothesis such as “Certain types of people are drawn to forum such as this one”. In fact to come up a hypothesis that is falsifiable I could say:

“Type theory suggests that Intuitive types (xNxx) are more common on Internet forums than would be expected by chance”

We could then see if there is significantly more than 14% Initiatives on this forum and after applying probability tests (based on sample size) would hopefully be able to either prove or disprove the hypothesis.
 

DaRick

New member
Joined
Oct 19, 2007
Messages
100
MBTI Type
INFJ
Enneagram
4w5
It is considered pop psychology. The dogmatic approach to it is also pseudo-intellectualism. The stereotyping of people to the extent that certain behaviors are expected of them based on their type with the assumption that there is nothing they can do to change it, has gone beyond reason. That is pristine prejudice. It isn't even close to Jung's original theories. People use it as a way to simplify the world and justify ideas that otherwise have no justification.

It's an interesting theory and I enjoy learning about it and analyzing it. More than that I enjoy critiquing it as a way to balance its apparently natural tendency towards prejudicial thinking.

Yes, I have been on the receiving end of this 'stereotyping'. People begin to see things in you, or aspects of your personality, that either don't exist or act as part of a facade. I had one ENFP bonehead tell me that they knew I was an ISTJ, despite me not actually liking them or knowing them all that well, for instance (I hate the ISTJ description). Put simply, the MBTI is a signal for certain individuals (including teachers who should know better), to try and put people into a 'box', so to speak. You can't do it, as my mother explained, because everybody's out of the box to begin with, as Jung realised. It's like cramming a dozen people into a room only big enough to fit one person. Despite my irritation with the test itself, it still fascinates me.
 

Ezra

Luctor et emergo
Joined
Dec 12, 2007
Messages
534
MBTI Type
ENTJ
Enneagram
8w7
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Anyone who takes interest in MBTT is likely to take it seriously. You should know this from t16t, snegledmaca; there are plenty of people who take socionics as seriously as MBTT. But you talk as if this is a bad thing. Why do you think this?
 

red13

New member
Joined
Dec 9, 2007
Messages
40
MBTI Type
INTJ
It's a theory, not a fact, interesting, but not falsifiable, and therefore not scientific.

Aren’t theories the backbone of science? In the Intelligent Design (ID) court case in Pennsylvania , the ID camp claimed that Evolution was “just a theory”. The evolutionists spent a lot of time explaining, and ultimately persuading, the court that theories were essential to science and that virtually nothing in science is a fact. I’m sure that there are many experiments that can be conducted with MBTI that are falsifiable, although it’s true that most have not been tried.

I did a quick search on scholar.google.com, which only contains research papers, and found 5,910 hits. MBTI is widely used in academic research. Have a look at
mbti - Google Scholar

Having to wade through the stereotypes associated with whichever type you declare yourself to be is very much like trudging through a field knee-deep in cow patties. A habit can develop in which people's words are twisted to fit the expectations of whatever type the reader is assuming them to possess. IMO it's very important on an MBTI site to have critics and threads exploring the limitations of the system.

Although I believe that the four dichotomies are basically correct, I’ve never been terribly convinced by the “rounded” descriptions for a particular type. I suspect there are actually a lot more than four dichotomies to describe the six billion individual that exist today, but you need to choose the smallest number of indicators that proves useful and that may well be four.

I think things ought to be proven before they are relied upon... But thats my opinion

Prove gravity, it’s reckoned to be the closest thing to faith that many scientists have!

Finally the reason that MBTI is important to me is because it can be used to make projects more successful. In thirty years of participating and running IT projects it has become apparent that a failed or poorly executed project can have a terrible effect on people. I’ve come across many nervous breakdowns, mostly people on the project, people who have lost their jobs and even projects where their outcome would affect how many people survive e.g. systems in Accident and Emergency departments. I strongly believe that by building well-balanced and harmonious teams, significantly better results can be achieved. If I were building a team today, MBTI would be an important part of the team selection and team building process.
 

autumn

New member
Joined
Oct 5, 2007
Messages
106
MBTI Type
eNFP
The fact that the theory can be misunderstood, or has room for refinement does not make it intrinsically wrong. The fact that it can be misused, and is misused by some people, does not make it intrinsically bad. People can misuse any number of things which are, taken of themselves, good things. The point needs to be made more often that a correct understanding of MBTI is supposed to lead to greater understanding among different people, not to stereotyping.

Ha -- Exactly what I would expect a melancholic endomorph to say!!

That's awesome.

autumn
 

Randomnity

insert random title here
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
9,485
MBTI Type
ISTP
Enneagram
6w5
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Aren't theories the backbone of science? In the Intelligent Design (ID) court case in Pennsylvania the ID camp claimed that Evolution was “just a theory”. The evolutionists spent a lot of time explaining, and ultimately persuading, the court that theories were essential to science and that virtually nothing in science is a fact. I’m sure that there are many experiments that can be conducted with MBTI that are falsifiable, although it’s true that most have not been tried.

I did a quick search on scholar.google.com, which only contains research papers, and found 5,910 hits. MBTI is widely used in academic research. Have a look at
mbti - Google Scholar
It is too bad that the term "theory" is so often (mis)used in everyday speech. People start confusing scientific theory with "theory" as the word is commonly used.

A scientific theory (like evolution) is developed like this:
1) Hypothesis is come up with - a falsifiable explanation for a phenomenon.
2) Testable predictions are made and then many well-designed, reproducible experiments are done to see if the predictions happen
3) Given positive results, the scientific community accepts the theory as the most likely explanation, until new data is received

IOW, a scientific theory is not some random pipedream idea. It doesn't become a theory until it's passed through the above steps successfully. MBTI is a theory in the commonly-used sense, but not a theory in the scientific sense. It's still in the first step, as far as I know...its predictions aren't very testable right now and as a result the theory isn't falsifiable. Until someone develops experiments to test the hypothesis that MBTI is correct, it won't be scientific, which is why it should really be used with caution rather than as an absolute law.

Prove gravity, it’s reckoned to be the closest thing to faith that many scientists have!
Theories can't be proven but they can be heavily supported and never refuted, and therefore as close to fact as science is able to come. The fact that theories can't be absolutely proven doesn't mean that any half-baked, unsupported idea can now be considered science.

I'm not qualified to say whether the MBTI is accurate or not, but it's pretty clear that it is nonscientific, at least as I have experienced it.
 
Last edited:

"?"

New member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
1,167
MBTI Type
TiSe
It seems to me that most of the criticism against the MBTI theories are that people misuse it and therefore it must be diminished. That doesn't make sense. Merely teach it better surely?
In part I agree, but mostly there have been a number of authors for the sake of simplifying have made some errors (i.e. using dichotomies rather than the type functions). As a result many do not take the time to learn the system in depth. I can't blame the messengers. It's the receivers fault not to develop better a better understanding of the system. As for whether it is taken too seriously, I think that people take themselves too seriously and as a result will transfer that to arguing in the name of the system. However, I would think these would be the same people who have a hard time living in the real world in general.
 
Top