Typh0n
clever fool
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2013
- Messages
- 3,497
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
What you're talking about is the idea of the Jungian shadow and attributing it to an other, or if you use the short hand "othering".
Its also called scapegoating, although that is a slightly different deal, only slightly.
Its badly understood, even in some of its primary sources, so I dont throw it out there much, the same as Freud's idea about the thing you repress, suppress and deny being something you can consciously claim to hate but nonetheless remains unconsciously quite the contrary, its badly understood too, cited in the wrong ways and contexts too for particular purposes.
Personally, I really dont like this thinking because it makes it impossible to take even a modestly critical position on anything, the minute you say you're not quite so sure about this or that and it sounds like a very bad idea, well, its obvious you're only saying that because the contrary is the case, you see? Its as insidious as the newspeak in big brother's 1984.
Hmmm, I think you're coloring this Jungian notion of the shadow with moral connotations. Really, Jung doesn't say it is good or bad to project one's shadow in a moral sense, just that many people do it without being aware of it. Jung brings this up not to preach, which would be ironic, but just to remind people of what makes them tick.
This is how I apply this: I am critical of certain things, including in a moral/ethical sense, but I try to remind myself that my judgements aeren't absolute but I try to say stuff like "it gets on my nerves when people say this or that" but I try to take it with some humor that I am upset at certain things. Not too much, I take my own judgement seriously and if I feel there is something wrong or dishonest about someone else's thinking, I'll stand by that. It's just good to have some distance vis a vis one's own moral judgements, that doesn't mean you laugh at yourself to the point of invalidating your own feelings, but just enough to see yourself more clearly.
The use of this is to better make choices. If you think this or that political group is evil for example, you can ask yourself why you have such visceral gut reactions to that group's ideology. I use politics because it is a domain where these judgements tend to come out. It's always good to understand what makes you react the way you do. After that, you're free to still think that poltical group is worng and mistaken, but you will own that choice rather than it owning you.