• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Relational Competition and "Social" Bullying

Maverick

New member
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
880
MBTI Type
ENTJ
The thread about bullies evoked how some people do not bully openly but do so in a covert manner. Social expectations may suggest to people that overt aggressiveness is wrong. Left with no way to express aggression, people may have to turn to specific tactics. Some forms of indirect bullying include: emotional manipulation, gossip, backstabbing, ignoring and giving the could shoulder, sabotaging someone's work, keeping important information, etc. These forms of indirect bullying can be just as damaging, even sometimes more, than direct bullying.

Tradtionally, gender roles make it so that overt aggressiveness is more tolerated in males than in females. I have a couple of personal examples in mind of females that were bullied by other females in a relational way. One thing I have noticed is that these bullied females were not weak or victim like in any way. Rather, they were honest and direct females who said what they think but didn't want to play by the rules of the game. One such person I know was an ENTJ. She was completely ostracized by some of her peers because they could not stand her direct mode of communication. As a consequence, she ended up hanging out with guys. It was really a sight to behold... the other females would superficially treat the ENTJ in a very nice way. Then, once she had her backed turned, they would say things like "Let's just ignore her next time she comes!". The worse being, that, once the ENTJ tried to confront them openly, they would deny everything and, worse, would then accuse the ENTJ of being mean and aggressive. When I asked the girls why they were doing that, one replied: "There's no use in creating needless conflict. Plus, come on... she's really a bitch, she deserves it". The ENTJ in my example had lots of charisma. The other girls might have been jealous of her and also wanted to punish her for not conforming to gender roles.

What do you think about these behaviors and do you have any anecdotes in mind?
 

niffer

New member
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
1,217
MBTI Type
ENfP
Enneagram
8w9
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Direct mode of communication?
 

darlets

New member
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
357
Some of this is sexual competition isn't it?

Girls especially aren't socially allowed to be overt about the competition so they covertly undermine others. The punchline to this is girls that can't/won't put up with this S@#$ tend to go hang out with guys and have lots of male friends.

Alot of what I saw in the corporate world was a group that was willing to suck up upper management and a group that weren't and were gotten rid off
 

Maverick

New member
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
880
MBTI Type
ENTJ
Direct mode of communication?

Defined as way of communicating assertively and going straight to the point. This style might conflict with traditional gender expectations about females for example.
 

niffer

New member
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
1,217
MBTI Type
ENfP
Enneagram
8w9
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Defined as way of communicating assertively and going straight to the point. This style might conflict with traditional gender expectations about females for example.

Oh....so non-direct would be like talking about endless amounts of filler-type boring crap? The kind that seems to define the lives of these types of people?
 

darlets

New member
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
357
Defined as way of communicating assertively and going straight to the point. This style might conflict with traditional gender expectations about females for example.
Hell yes. Direct communication is not encouraged in females. My sister who is married to an INTJ was actually told by other women, you have to be more indirect when dealing with men. :shock: :wtf: They actually think she's being rude, but he likes direct up front communication.

Girls have to be "sugar and spice and all things nice :smile: ":sick:
 

Maverick

New member
Joined
Apr 29, 2007
Messages
880
MBTI Type
ENTJ
Oh....so non-direct would be like talking about endless amounts of filler-type boring crap? The kind that seems to define the lives of these types of people?

Not necessarily... For example:

Direct: "I don't respect person X and I think X is a loser"
Indrect: "Person X is kind of cute, in the way that X never manages to succeed at anything"
 

niffer

New member
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
1,217
MBTI Type
ENfP
Enneagram
8w9
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Not necessarily... For example:

Direct: "I don't respect person X and I think X is a loser"
Indrect: "Person X is kind of cute, in the way that X never manages to succeed at anything"

But the second version is so..dishonourable!
 

Siúil a Rúin

when the colors fade
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
14,037
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
496
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
What do you think about these behaviors and do you have any anecdotes in mind?
I agree with your assessment in general, but strangely enough, I have encountered a number of men who behave the same way. They happen to be musician/performers in administrative positions. They lay on the sugar and then find ways to destroy people.

When I attended a boarding high school my 'friends' would say horrible things about the girls dean but act really sweet whenever she came around. There was a particular flavor to the sweetness that I could read as fake. They treated me with the same sweetness. bleh. As a woman I tend to have the whole gentle 'sweet' demeanor, but still I cannot stand indirect communication and surround myself with very direct people. I fit the whole stereotype of avoiding conflict, but I do it by telling people 'no' and avoiding the problem people in conversation and interaction when possible. I loathe gossiping because it immediately destroys my trust in the person who is gossiping. My instinct is to view a situation from every angle, so I spend moments in the shoes of the one being gossiped about. In most cases it is only logical to assume that they'll do the same to me. When I vent about people, it is usually to a deeply trusted confidant who will not pass it along and often who is not involved with said person in any way.

I don't trust passive aggressive people. Some people use both passive and overt aggression. My sister's mother-in-law is one such person. Just because a person is willing to be rude/hostile outright doesn't mean they don't also engage in passive aggressive behavior. Some do it all.

One reason I talk a lot about reading intent not specific style of communication is to bypass aggression in all its forms. I can see that the direct individual can be misread as hostile and the indirect individual misread as nice. All I care about is the intent: is it to destroy and control others, or to solve problems? It's not hard to adapt to style, even if very abrupt, if there is enough trust in place to know that harm is not the intent.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,187
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Tradtionally, gender roles make it so that overt aggressiveness is more tolerated in males than in females.

I think that is true. There might be a tendency towards how each gender chooses to express power over others, but one disturbing trend is a rise in direct physical violence by girls against each other in schools. For whatever reason, more overt aggression is becoming acceptable.

the other females would superficially treat the ENTJ in a very nice way. Then, once she had her backed turned, they would say things like "Let's just ignore her next time she comes!". The worse being, that, once the ENTJ tried to confront them openly, they would deny everything and, worse, would then accuse the ENTJ of being mean and aggressive. When I asked the girls why they were doing that, one replied: "There's no use in creating needless conflict. Plus, come on... she's really a bitch, she deserves it".

:dry:

I hate that sort of thing.


What do you think about these behaviors and do you have any anecdotes in mind?

My daughter is in third grade and has already had to deal with it. She said the other week a group of girls would come nearby and talk about her... and every time she tried to join their group, they would leave, just far enough that she could not be part of the group, and then look at her and laugh. (She's a tough cookie, though -- she befriends the other girls who have been shunned, and she's intruded on their group and joined their conversations whether they liked it or not.)

I would really so much hope that those behaviors would be left behind in childhood, instead of being practiced by adults. It happens when people are territorial as well, like in churches or other organizations, where there is a "self-ordained privileged" group. People who just want to bolster their own importance by ostracizing others.

It definitely seems possible that your friend was being ostracized because of her strong personality and because she was not acting in line with the other women at her company -- i.e., breaking the social code.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,187
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Odd Girl Out: The Hidden Culture of Aggression in Girls was the first book I read that spoke openly about girls' cattiness. Girls don't grow out of it--no one grows out of bully behavior, I don't think--it's too effective a survival strategy.

Do you know what I hate most about cattiness?

It steals your voice.

It muddies your vision.

It tries to tell you that what you thought you saw and heard was a lie, and it prevents you from feeling you can voice your concern without being labeled as the crazy one. It makes you doubt yourself. It totally erodes a person at the core.

One thing I always appreciated about the more typical "masculine" approach was that it was all up-front -- there is a conflict, you thrash it out, then you're done, and everyone moves on.
 

rivercrow

shoshaku jushaku
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
1,555
MBTI Type
type
Do you know what I hate most about cattiness?

It steals your voice.

It muddies your vision.

It tries to tell you that what you thought you saw and heard was a lie, and it prevents you from feeling you can voice your concern without being labeled as the crazy one. It makes you doubt yourself. It totally erodes a person at the core.
Fair enough.
One thing I always appreciated about the more typical "masculine" approach was that it was all up-front -- there is a conflict, you thrash it out, then you're done, and everyone moves on.
True, for the most part.

What I dislike about 'the more typical "masculine" approach' is that it's expected as a part of social culture.

Trying to step outside of our culture of social aggression is a good way to become a target.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,187
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
What I dislike about 'the more typical "masculine" approach' is that it's expected as a part of social culture. Trying to step outside of our culture of social aggression is a good way to become a target.

Well... yes. That's the part I *didn't* much like. The Alpha Male thing gets old.
 

Siúil a Rúin

when the colors fade
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
14,037
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
496
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
Well... yes. That's the part I *didn't* much like. The Alpha Male thing gets old.
The "alpha male" overt aggression is likely a catalyst for the female passive aggression, and vice versa. It wouldn't make much sense that they occur in isolation. Some types of outright aggression are also misrepresentations. Men may use exaggeration where women use opposites? Does that make sense?
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,187
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
The "alpha male" overt aggression is likely a catalyst for the female passive aggression, and vice versa. It wouldn't make much sense that they occur in isolation. Some types of outright aggression are also misrepresentations. Men may use exaggeration where women use opposites? Does that make sense?

I think I understand what you mean:
Exaggeration = accentuating the aggression into raw power
opposites = the passive-aggressive thing, channeling what would have become raw power into opposing behavior

I am not sure how to PROVE any of that, but it is interesting to consider.

Another idea; I can easily see evolutionary behavioralists saying things like natural selection would have favored male hunters/fighters who showed direct aggression, considering their physical makeup and role in the society (hunter/aggressor). Meanwhile, selection would not have favored such women because their task was to maintain the home base and raise the children, so the behavior that would have been bred for would have included alternate forms of social aggression... things that got the aggression out but did not overtly destroy the community.

Or something like that, this version is rough. :)
 

rivercrow

shoshaku jushaku
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
1,555
MBTI Type
type
A class I took on assertiveness (don't ask) had this tidbit of info.

In mixed-sex arguments, men are afraid of being verbally humiliated by women and women are afraid of being killed by men.

Somehow, that follows this discussion, but I can't make it fit at the moment.
 

Totenkindly

@.~*virinaĉo*~.@
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
50,187
MBTI Type
BELF
Enneagram
594
Instinctual Variant
sx/sp
Somehow, that follows this discussion, but I can't make it fit at the moment.

Are men afraid of the verbal humiliation? Some seem numb or immune to it, they do not get the "sensitivity" of it at all and shrug it off. I've heard many women complain about how their standard ways of "asking for things" in the relationships seem to go way over the men's heads.

I can see that a man might be afraid of being humiliated in terms of his competence and/or strength, verbally, though.

The woman thing seems very real to me. Men seem ingrained in our culture to not hit women (you can hit men, not women, or you're a real jerk). But it still doesn't address the fact that men have more muscle and generally more size than women, and many times if a man wanted to overpower a woman, he could do so unless she is prepared for it.

Put another way, men generally don't know what it's like to be afraid (or at least wary) to walk alone across a parking lot at night.
 

Lookin4theBestNU

New member
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
801
MBTI Type
ENFj
Enneagram
2w3
I find it interesting that you imply belief that covert attacks are somehow wrong yet you initiated one anyway. I get the point that this thread was inspired, at least in part, by yours truly. I will walk right in since the door is open and will probably regret this but I'm willing to be vulnerable and let my guard down...at least for awhile. I'm going to openly show my reasoning/thinking process, IRL and most certainly about the thread(s) in question for examples if you are actually interested. I am assuming that this thread was meant to be a real question to gather information and not solely as an attack though I could be mistaken. I am after constructive criticism in better communication (if that is what this thread was intended for) not an argument/justification/approval. I will proceed from there. I am surprised usually when it seems assumed that I need everyones pats-on-the-back all of the time. I am a strong enough person, feeler or not, that someone hating me on the forum is not going to cause me any lost sleep. I enjoy conversations/reading the thoughts of many,many people here but those people whose words stick with me are very few.
Direct: "I don't respect person X and I think X is a loser"
Indrect: "Person X is kind of cute, in the way that X never manages to succeed at anything"
Yesterdays' instance is fresh in everyones mind so I will start here. My attack on BW I thought would have been blatantly obvious to anyone with an ounce of intuition. This may seem dishonest, but assuredly it's not, I was quite shocked that it was taken as a way of dancing around it or be 'precious' or hiding it from him in anyway. I used the word "cute" quite purposely and thought it would be direct to him and any another N type. My intention as well was that it was meant to be worse than saying "You are a complete fucking asshole! How dare you treat a forum newcomer like shit due to your personal fucking issues that have nothing at all to do with her!?!" The anticipated response of "Ti doesn't take into account other peoples feelings blah blah blah I have no feelings blah blah blah" wasn't what I was after. I was intending to be highly 'disrespectful' but was not trying to say BW never manages to accomplish anything. I miscommunicated obviously if that was gathered.

Let's say however I had approached it that way. First it would have been shrugged off, and given the wrong impression, therefore a waste of time and the latter far from the goal. Secondly I was trying to keep an already attacked Feeler from getting her feelings hurt further, that was my main concern. I was (hopefully) as well giving her a way to view BWs own covert attack a little less harshly and take the sting out of it. I seriously doubt I would stay in a forum if after my first day I had a thread started about me and then watch the conversation disintegrate into a Jerry Springer mudslinging contest. Lastly and this applies to most communication from me either IRL or here, it was meant to be efficient=maximum impact for minimal effort. In essence killing two (or more) birds with one stone. I refused to "shut-up" in this instance, which I do more often than is known, and watch another episode happen again period. I am sincere when I inquire what more could have been accomplished had I approached it the other way?

Tradtionally, gender roles make it so that overt aggressiveness is more tolerated in males than in females. I have a couple of personal examples in mind of females that were bullied by other females in a relational way. One thing I have noticed is that these bullied females were not weak or victim like in any way. Rather, they were honest and direct females who said what they think but didn't want to play by the rules of the game. One such person I know was an ENTJ. She was completely ostracized by some of her peers because they could not stand her direct mode of communication. As a consequence, she ended up hanging out with guys. It was really a sight to behold... the other females would superficially treat the ENTJ in a very nice way. Then, once she had her backed turned, they would say things like "Let's just ignore her next time she comes!". The worse being, that, once the ENTJ tried to confront them openly, they would deny everything and, worse, would then accuse the ENTJ of being mean and aggressive. When I asked the girls why they were doing that, one replied: "There's no use in creating needless conflict. Plus, come on... she's really a bitch, she deserves it". The ENTJ in my example had lots of charisma. The other girls might have been jealous of her and also wanted to punish her for not conforming to gender roles.
I will say on this that similar things have happened to me as such, but I am not expecting anyone to care so please don't take it that way. I don't think it had a thing to do with jealousy. I am not sure what it had to do with, maybe I am just a bitch, but it's possible gender was the reason. I'm only fearful of direct confrontation in a few instances IRL. I can do it however when it seems like the best way to go which isn't often as it doesn't pay off. All in all, I am skeptical of this story and it's purpose so at this stage not willing to invest much into it until it becomes clear.

I am tired of writing but I think CTG, and my attack on her, should be explained at least quickly. I WAS being a bitch to her and tried being direct about the behaviors which were bothering me. I should have let it go and it was a weakness on my part that I didn't restrain myself more. The internal struggle I have with my irritation and knowing that my expectations are selfish is difficult. My intentions I stated were not entirely pure, but I did have a good one too. Unfortunately I think the bad outweighed the good. I compromised my own values in not forcing myself to be more tolerant. I could have handled it differently. I don't know just how much I regret it, but I know not enough yet and that's as honest and direct as I can get.
 
Top