The MBTIc Gauntlet 2008 Discussion Thread

[substitute]

right now it's just myself, carebear, trinity, bluebell, oberon and digest. a few pop in to say hey but that's it really.

woah, no I totally wanna be on that team!

 

[EffEmDoubleyou]

In the interest of fair play, I wish to point out that I believe the Black team should have 23 points instead of 22, and be tied with Green for first place. They had 18 before, and should get 5 for second place in Challenge 4.

 

[Samuel De Mazarin]

In the interest of fair play, I wish to point out that I believe the Black team should have 23 points instead of 22, and be tied with Green for first place. They had 18 before, and should get 5 for second place in Challenge 4.

5+3+10+5 = 22 Points

isn't that obvious?

 

[Ivy]

Grr. That's what you people get for letting a mathlexic run your gauntlet!

 

[Tigerlily]

It's okay Ivy! I still love you!

 

[Totenkindly]

It's okay Ivy! I still love you!

Yes, you'll always be number 42 1 in our book!

 

[Ivy]

So that all teams have the benefit of all rules clarifications, here's one that I posted in response to a post in one of the private team forums:

Clarification: the challenge was intentionally vague so no clarification is forthcoming.

IOW, do whatever you want. This is supposed to be a fun one.

 

[Tigerlily]

ours will have you pissing in your pants.

 

[The_Liquid_Laser]

ours will have you pissing in your pants.

I'd like to see a video clip of that.

 

[Totenkindly]

I'd like to see a video clip of that.

With dubbing overtop!

 

[Tigerlily]

are the other teams experiences MIA members? We're literally down to three and thankfully they're strong members otherwise we wouldn't stand a chance at willing this challenge.

 

[nottaprettygal]

are the other teams experiences MIA members?

Yup.

 

[disregard]

I really like how well this gauntlet thing has served the purpose of making people more familiar with each other.

 

[Geoff]

I really like how well this gauntlet thing has served the purpose of making people more familiar with each other.

That'll be why they are all MIA

 

[substitute]

Having single type teams might make for some more heated rivalry, and outside interest in results/products too...

 

[Haight]

That's a good idea. But who gets to decide what type folks are?

 

[EffEmDoubleyou]

are the other teams experiences MIA members? We're literally down to three and thankfully they're strong members otherwise we wouldn't stand a chance at willing this challenge.

We experience MIA at times, but it's generally based on the challenge. Some people will really be into a particular challenge and then sit another one out. That's cool though, because too many people involved in the decision making for any one challenge is kind of a bear to deal with.

 

[substitute]

That's a good idea. But who gets to decide what type folks are?

Dunno, themselves I suppose. Could make for more interesting 'occurrences' if (read when) people start bitching that they've got some person in their team that's not a REAL whatever-type, and blaming their losses on that etc. Could be quite amusing.

 

[Tigerlily]

That's a good idea. But who gets to decide what type folks are?

You.

 

[Haight]

You.

Well, that would be the only correct way, of course.