Sure, but im more concerned about incomplete definitions - especially when the lack of nuance can make such a big difference in peoples judgements,justifications and attitudes, which would then in turn be able to cause significant demage when improperly applied.
This definition was ,without the specific stressing of intent, very much incomplete - no offence.
User Tag List
-
01-07-2018, 05:05 PM #31
-
01-07-2018, 05:41 PM #32
In my opinion 3w2 wins this one.
-
01-07-2018, 06:05 PM #33
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- MBTI
- IxTP
- Enneagram
- 5w4 sx/sp
- Socionics
- LII Ti
- Posts
- 14,551
-
01-07-2018, 06:22 PM #34
Yes. (Or if you want to nitpick, the teasing out of this element allows for a more precise, narrow and accurate definition of (deliberate) manipulation.
Especially since so many see manipulation with malicious intent where sheer clumsiness and learning is taking place - often with disastrous self-fullfilling prophesy cobsequences.
-
01-07-2018, 06:42 PM #35
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
- Socionics
- EIE Ni
- Posts
- 2,625
-
01-07-2018, 06:55 PM #36
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- MBTI
- IxTP
- Enneagram
- 5w4 sx/sp
- Socionics
- LII Ti
- Posts
- 14,551
Last I heard, a proper definition consists of something like the genus and species of the animal kingdom. For example, a "desk" is:
a piece of furniture [genus] with a flat or sloped surface and typically with drawers, at which one can read, write, or do other work [species].
define desk - Google Search
You will find that a definition almost always consists of these two elements.
To manipulate, in the social/psychological sense, means to "control or influence (a person or situation) cleverly, unfairly, or unscrupulously."
I'm not saying that we can't attach the ideas of learning and growth to the concept of manipulation, but we can also do it with other social/psychological concepts. For example, I can attach the ideas of learning and growth to hate, love, jealousy, pride, etc.
-
01-07-2018, 07:04 PM #37
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- MBTI
- IxTP
- Enneagram
- 5w4 sx/sp
- Socionics
- LII Ti
- Posts
- 14,551
-
01-07-2018, 07:07 PM #38
-
01-07-2018, 07:09 PM #39
- Join Date
- Apr 2011
- MBTI
- IxTP
- Enneagram
- 5w4 sx/sp
- Socionics
- LII Ti
- Posts
- 14,551
-
01-07-2018, 07:18 PM #40
- Join Date
- Sep 2015
- Socionics
- EIE Ni
- Posts
- 2,625
ahhh although it's often in a negative connotation, the definition can be used in a neutral state. Using the source you provided, look at the word choice closely. It means to "control or influence (a person or situation) cleverly, unfairly, or unscrupulously. "Cleverly" is defined as "In an intelligent, original, or skilful way". Manipulation implies calculation to get to one's end,
@Amargith: is this what you were trying to get at?
Similar Threads
-
Which Type is the Most Likely to Have a God Complex
By Ginkgo in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 28Last Post: 06-23-2015, 05:37 PM -
Which type is the most passive-aggressive?
By Triglav in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 29Last Post: 05-07-2015, 12:55 PM -
Which type is the most manipulative and dishonest?
By Infidel in forum General PsychologyReplies: 4Last Post: 11-26-2009, 01:03 AM -
Which Type is the Most Intuitive About People?
By Ginkgo in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 68Last Post: 10-11-2009, 06:47 PM -
So, which letter is the most important?
By Yloh in forum Myers-Briggs and Jungian Cognitive FunctionsReplies: 64Last Post: 10-06-2009, 12:19 PM