Werebudgie
I want my account deleted
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2014
- Messages
- 398
- MBTI Type
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 6w5
1. I myself strongly encourage anyone seeking to understand this specific thread to place it in the larger context of yeghor's overall participation on this site. To my eyes, there's a rather clear pattern with multiple variations - all centering around the same basic goal: for yeghor to to "confirm" his various self-referential thought and belief structures by any means necessary and using various strategies to reject external realities that don't fit. My own time/energy/interest is limited, so I'll leave it to others to investigate and better articulate this bigger picture, if anyone is so inclined.
eta2:
Wow. You folks are just freaking addicted to negative drama, aren't you?
I've now deleted the part of my comment that kicked off the ongoing drama below, since apparently striking it out as I did last night (trying to be polite and leave what people responded to) didn't make a dent.
What a cesspool of dysfunction this site is.
----------------------------------------
retaining this part:
I'm not sure if looking at it from that perspective would increase collective clarity or not. If not, please ignore this part as not useful.
------------------------------------------
and this comment from the edit last night:
eta1: *shrug* I guess the whole "here's one possible angle of vision on the situation, please ignore if it doesn't assist collective clarity" approach just isn't how things roll on this site and there simply has to be a discussion. Hopefully the three comments below are sufficient to put the crossed-out perspective aside as not useful for clarity and the discussion can move on. Good luck, everyone.
eta2:
Wow. You folks are just freaking addicted to negative drama, aren't you?
I've now deleted the part of my comment that kicked off the ongoing drama below, since apparently striking it out as I did last night (trying to be polite and leave what people responded to) didn't make a dent.
What a cesspool of dysfunction this site is.
----------------------------------------
retaining this part:
I'm not sure if looking at it from that perspective would increase collective clarity or not. If not, please ignore this part as not useful.
------------------------------------------
and this comment from the edit last night:
eta1: *shrug* I guess the whole "here's one possible angle of vision on the situation, please ignore if it doesn't assist collective clarity" approach just isn't how things roll on this site and there simply has to be a discussion. Hopefully the three comments below are sufficient to put the crossed-out perspective aside as not useful for clarity and the discussion can move on. Good luck, everyone.
Last edited: