• You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to additional post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), view blogs, respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free, so please join our community today! Just click here to register. You should turn your Ad Blocker off for this site or certain features may not work properly. If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us by clicking here.

Four vs Six

S

Stansmith

Guest
The only difference on paper that's relevant in my opinion is the identity/inner world part. All that stuff about well-adjustedness, being highly other focused and fitting in is fluff and doesn't apply to many Sixes who mistype as Fours.
 

Galena

Silver and Lead
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
3,786
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
The idea of the list is to show the themes of the subtypes, not to list movies that the types would like. Do you relate to any of the themes of the subtypes for four?
Yes, regardless of preference, it is the center on the list of relevant themes for me. Each of the instincts evokes something different to relate to. The so themes tap the most into my fears when I'm out in the world. They're not things I'm fluent or confident in, but they concern me because they are vulnerable. I protect these vulnerabilities by setting boundaries with others. The sp themes are things that happen inside my mind and mostly stay there circulating inside, very difficult to put into words. These are the oldest, bringing up early childhood memories when I contemplate them. The sx themes seethe closer to the surface, especially where art stirs the competitive drive. When nothing else is pressing, these things are on my mind the most and are where it rests. The people closest to me are all too familiar with them.

My earlier post gave only the strongest example of how seeing the themes up on screen can feel strange as a result of the relation. A lot of the fives also make me nod, but those films are easier and more fun to watch, as there isn't that same edgy sense of something being brought into public space that I don't want to share. It's like 8 and 5 themes (and more...): people like to escape into them in fictional form, but not out of a genuine, real-life respect. They don't go over the same way out there. Teenagers fangirling over a quiet protagonist they'd whisper about or ignore if he were real. Maybe they've got someone like him in their homeroom class. Does he have any friends? I understand it's one of the purposes of fiction, but I don't have to like it, and it's draining when the themes are personal.

But I'm rather picky and self-protective towards fictional media in general because it all gets under my skin easily. I consume little compared to nonfiction, but that which I do either meets my desire for emotional realism and explores atmospheres I want to enter seriously, is historically relevant to what I produce, or is unmistakeably for play. At a glance, Melancholia looks like my sort of film, but I'll find out when I watch it this weekend. Thanks for reminding me of its existence. I was interested when it came out, but far from movie theaters or decent internet that year.
 

ayoitsStepho

Twerking & Lurking
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
4,838
MBTI Type
ISFP
Enneagram
4w3
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
Neither and both. Ha! Ayo is much more bubbly, and Marm is way more aggressive. I'm somewhere in the middle.

I know this is super late in the game but the people who interact with me in real life say I'm either quiet or I speak my mind too much. I've never had people tell me I'm bubbly. It proabably helps that I actually like the people here, where as I always feel greatly misunderstood amongst the people I'm surrounded by. When I feel understood, listened to and wanted, I'm just a happier, "bubbly" person.
 

Standuble

New member
Joined
Aug 23, 2011
Messages
1,149
Incidentally I'm reading a thread regarding this right now on the other site. Paraphrased from the source material: "An unhealthy four is a boring snob. Even if they turn their failure into a creation they will still be a boring snob. An unhealthy six is someone you hate. They can make you want to kill them with your bare hands."

I think the two on the surface are very similar. One thing I will say however is that I think the description of four as "afraid of not having an identity" and others which say "they have no solid identity" are falsehoods which contribute to some of the confusion. I think its more accurate for the former that they are "afraid of not having significance". For the latter I think they have a solid identity: they know who they are through and through. The problem is (from what I understand) is that there is too much of themselves to observe all at once. For example they can't fantasise in an imaginary world whilst engaging in evaluation of their skills. It would be like looking left and right at the same time. So when they turn their attention to one area they become blind to another: a perfect example is that they have an emotional longing or envy for the life another leads or the skills they possess but this is occurring when honest reflection upon themselves is not consciously being carried out. The second they turn their attention back to their own lives they can continue with reflecting upon their skills (and hopefully discovering that they possess talent themselves). Of course they second guess this conclusion when they turn their attention away from it.

Believing what they are currently seeing is "the whole self" I think is the key issue: not just for fours but also for the descriptions about them. If someone thinks they are seeing the whole picture yet the picture keeps changing they will conclude that the picture itself is fluid and not solid.
 

skylights

i love
Joined
Jul 6, 2010
Messages
7,756
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
So much is clouded by external factors.

Truth lies in the core.

Do you run from fear of being no one, or do you run from fear of no support?
 

OrangeAppled

Sugar Hiccup
Joined
Mar 20, 2009
Messages
7,626
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
4w5
Instinctual Variant
sp/sx
These types are only confused when NFs, IMO, or perhaps some ISFPs. An SJ, ST or NT 6 just looks 6.

It seems to me, as a four: Sixes have this more heady energy- a lot more anxious and keyed up. It's like you can hear the gears in their head turning. Or there's this sort of nervousness. They seem more either cynical or skeptical (typically 6w5) or trusting and lighter/fun (6w7). They seem more human to me, if that makes sense. Sixes may rebel for the sake of rebelling- for example, shaving their head and getting tattoos just to 'freak people out'. There are a lot more authority issues, or issues with belonging, or issues with deliberately setting themselves apart. Sixes are more loyal and supportive/ desire loyalty and support than fours. They tend to think out loud or tell their thoughts to others in order to process them- the 6w7s, anyway.

Fours have more of a heavy heart energy- this regretful moroseness. When I think of four I think of the first verse of a poem by Paul Verlaine- Il pleure dans mon coeur comme il pleut sur la ville/ Quelle est cette langueur qui penetre mon coeur- It cries in my heart like it rains on the city/ What is this languor which penetrates my heart?

Fours tend to be more sullen or despondent. This isn't to say a four can't have fun and can't be silly, but there's always this undercurrent that the fun silliness is fleeting. Fours are separated from others, but they don't do this deliberately. They just are. They may shave their head and get tattoos but it's more about expressing something within. Fours don't rebel so much as just have a different way of seeing things/ doing things. Others may perceive this as rebellion, but it's not. Fours are self absorbed- by this mean, every thing comes back into the self- how does this affect me? How does this make me feel? How does this relate to my past and me feelings of regret, shame, envy? Fours can also be supportive, but often drop people when the relationship 'feels wrong'. They have higher expectations and become frustrated more easily.

I think this is a good distinction :yes:

To elaborate even more...or rather ramble a bit...

One reason why 6s may be more appealing as actual companions (not admired from afar) even when average or unhealthy is that their fixation is more common (Naranjo suggests the 3-6-9 triad as representing the most basic fixations in human psychology and the others as being extensions or secondary to these, which is why these types are most populous). So any neurotic aspect is like the "normal" way to be unhealthy, it's more relatable, understandable, etc. You'll see a lot of self-help and pop psychology frame so much in terms of fear & anxiety. Personally, enneagram helped me identify much of my skewed views & negative behavior as stemming from shame & feeling defective, which is spoken of far less (except in context of abuse). I used to say I could be "timid", but that implies a fear. I don't really fear people at all... I feel ashamed of myself. I hold back myself because I don't want to inflict myself on others. I really don't blame them for rejecting me. 6s seem to worry that others may be mean or dishonest, etc. They seem to consider themselves more innocent and fear some darkness in others - but it's also this projection of their own darkness. When they realize the latter, they still seek to justify it a lot. It becomes some matter of everybody being that way.

6s tend to fear what may be or already is, whether it's in objects, events or other people. They may fear their own faults and resist blame and being detected for falling short of ideals (sort of 1ish there, but it seems more anxious than angry). The focus is on what may be there or what is there. There's a fear of what could happen or what is happening or what may not. To me, 6s can seem paranoid. To them, I seem too into myself to be aware of potential dangers.

6s may feel guilt because they may have taken action or not taken action due to fear, and they see the negative consequences of it. In order to deflect blame, they can play victim. This can give them a martyr attitude. They can be very obsessed with their own worries & bad experiences, which can be self-absorped, but they can present it as informing others of what to fear. They tend to continue to act in the face of this, but it seems to get frantic and less and less relevant to what needs to be done. It's like action for the sake of action, so much worried thought they aren't really digesting anything, etc. It's 9ish inertia through action. Or they can deal with stress by treating reality like a strategy game; they try to keep track of people/things and manipulate them where they want them to be able to control outcomes. They have way more control issues than any 4 will ever have. 4s are only controlling in their creative pursuits (the stereotypical difficult artist), not

6s also have an image connection through 3 - but it's to find security through it. Whether it's being attractive or successful, they seek a security in being wanted/needed or possessing what they need to look out for themselves, not necessarily the kind of validation the 3 seeks. They may try too hard to "be all things", which unlike the 4, means they may lose touch with personal ideals & feelings. I see a lot of 6 women who try to straddle the "tomboy" and "sexy" line. They'll balk if you call them girly, but they'll balk if you call them boyish. They want to be extraordinary to win support of those who have the means to provide it. They get jealous of people who could harm this; they can be far more openly jealous & insecure than 4s (who experience envy very differently). They can become bullies in the name of defending underdogs. Etc...

4s lament.... they lament how short of their ideals they fall, they lament not being seen for who they are, they lament not having the love/significance others have. They lament the past is no longer, they lament the past that was, they lament what the present is not, they lament what the future may never be. The focus is on what is NOT, what is missing. There's a constant grieving over this. But the wistfulness of it makes you heavy... And combined with any refinement at all, it tends to register as aloof, snobby, cool, etc. It's like your mere existence puts a damper on others' happiness (much as a 6's paranoia can rub off). "Misery loves company" is kind of a 4ish attitude, but not cuz we want people to suffer. It can be the only way we know how to connect with someone else. It actually alleviates alienation. 4s can be self-absorped, but then so aware of it that they constantly deflect conversation away from themselves. This can make them seem secretive, and people may complain they are hard to get to know. 4s connect to 1 and can be very hard on themselves & others as far as ideals, and so the snobbery is not entirely untrue. The 4 can seem like a pre-madonna then, something 6s rarely seem like. I'll get tired of people thinking I can be difficult when I'll feel like I've tolerated so much VOID for so long. Like a 1, there can be an angry resentment from that. And the disintegration to 2 can make a 4 seem elitist also; there is a suddenly a pride in their flaws or strangeness, a sense this makes them "special". They may also become seductive, to draw people to them, because there's shame/pride preventing them from going to people.

I have seem elitism in 6s, but it tends to be a group thing (suspicious of outsiders, creating high standards to weed them out) connecting to 3 image, or it's a idealism (ie. Bukowski) that is being threatened, so the person seems to reject everything else. 4s are more lone wolfs, rejecting before being rejected, using an identity of refinement to make up for feeling ugly inside, etc, and elitism is more in the demeanor than the action itself (as the person may be very open to different kinds of people, but not at the expense of their identity, seeming to be unreachable then).

So to recap -
6s - fear what is, what may be, etc, may fear immediate future and take comfort in past/predictable elements or very far-off utopia-like ideal futures.
4s - lament what is not, what has never been or no longer is, what may never be, may have love/hate for the past (bad childhood or good one they miss), take comfort in future hoping for fantasies to manifest, may lament a far-off tragic future should present go on as-is.

So much is clouded by external factors.

Truth lies in the core.

Do you run from fear of being no one, or do you run from fear of no support?


Neither.... I don't run from fear because I don't experience a lot in those terms. Of course I have fears & worries, but it's not an overwhelming fixation for me. I don't tend to run from stuff, but resign myself.

I don't fear being no one.... I feel ashamed of who I am or who I am not. I know I am someone, I just don't feel it's someone who matters to others or someone I myself can even like.
I don't run from this.... I lament & grieve it, and withdraw in the process, alienating myself from people &, well, life. I suppose this might look like running from life, but it's more like stopping in your tracks and lying down to die. It's succumbing to the feelings, not running from them. That's why we will identify with the feelings, whereas 6s tend to project more (or experience them as an outside threat or force, rather than their own psychology).
 

skylights

i love
Joined
Jul 6, 2010
Messages
7,756
MBTI Type
INFP
Enneagram
6w7
Instinctual Variant
so/sx
Neither.... I don't run from fear because I don't experience a lot in those terms. Of course I have fears & worries, but it's not an overwhelming fixation for me. I don't tend to run from stuff, but resign myself.

I don't fear being no one.... I feel ashamed of who I am or who I am not. I know I am someone, I just don't feel it's someone who matters to others or someone I myself can even like.
I don't run from this.... I lament & grieve it, and withdraw in the process, alienating myself from people &, well, life. I suppose this might look like running from life, but it's more like stopping in your tracks and lying down to die. It's succumbing to the feelings, not running from them. That's why we will identify with the feelings, whereas 6s tend to project more (or experience them as an outside threat or force, rather than their own psychology).

Ah, okay, so no fear for 4. Hiding or grieving or withdrawing then. Reacting negatively. Not flourishing. Stopping growth. Regressing. Moving into unhealth.

It's just... it would take me pages to list all the 6 descriptors I don't relate to, and how many aspects of the other points I do relate to. Your post above, I think many of the ideas are accurate, but there are some places I deviate, too.

It just seems the more detail that is added, the more it may stray from the core. Which is not to say I can necessarily articulate other types' cores well. 4 especially is one I struggle to understand.

As I have articulated in the thread on dis/liking what is popular, I struggle with extra "noise". I do not know if other 6s experience the same; it may be a symptom of Ne + 6, or perhaps a personal idiosyncracy. But I do much better with isolating the important information and weighing it than continuing to pour over more and more aggregate information.
 
S

Stansmith

Guest
I've known cp6 primadonnas, although yeah, they tend to alternate between that, and being strangely receptive, dependent and humble. Kanye West (cp6w7) for example is often described by some who've met him as a friendly, mild-mannered guy despite his media antics.

Primadonna behavior among 6s usually feels like overcompensation; perhaps they got into a fight a female friend in 10th grade and decided that they weren't going to trust anyone anymore.
 

Forever_Jung

Active member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
2,644
MBTI Type
ESFJ
Even though people find me quirky, contradictory, convoluted, and neurotic, nobody finds me mysterious. Nobody thinks I have hidden depths that they can't see. In fact, I sometimes get irritated by how lightly people take me.

4's are "heavier", and more mysterious, but what makes them so interesting, is also what makes them outsiders. People can find them a little unsettling.

It's kind of the Bruce Springsteen vs. Bob Dylan thing. They have a lot of things in common, but you'd never mix them up. Very distinct vibes. Bob Dylan is this mysterious genius, whereas Bruce Springsteen is a Joe Lunchpail figure. As cool and brilliant as Dylan is, he's a bit creepy/otherworldly. Meanwhile, most people can imagine having a beer with Springsteen, even though he's been a rich celebrity for 40 years.

Is it overly dramatic for me to say that 4's seem to bear the Mark of Cain? I don't mean in an insulting way, more like how Herman Hesse uses the term.

I've known cp6 primadonnas, although yeah, they tend to alternate between that, and being strangely receptive, dependent and humble. Kanye West (cp6w7) for example is often described by some who've met him as a friendly, mild-mannered guy despite his media antics.

Yes, Kanye's weirdness definitely strikes me as 6ish. I think that's why I don't hate him as much as a lot of other people seem to, because I can see where his craziness is coming from.
 
S

Stansmith

Guest
[MENTION=7040]Forever_Jung[/MENTION]

He doesn't seem very self-aware at times, which annoys me (only mildly. I don't think it's that serious, although he often seems paranoid and unhappy). I enjoy his music though, which is what matters.

I find 6w7s like Kid Cudi or Louis CK much more likeable.
 
S

Stansmith

Guest
I think very few people have much of an idea of what I'm like. Either that, or I just don't identify with whatever idea they may have of me based on my interactions with them.
 

Noon

New member
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
790
<great post>

<great post>

These are great posts... generally too a great thread. Oy, more thinking to do.

Issue #1 I'm turning over and over is the discrepancy between what 'truths' I've introspected or self-analyzed to and the 'truths' that have ended up playing out in my actions, relations, life (this is what made me want to take another look in the first place). Issue #2 is almost the same in reverse: how events in my life have impacted my inner terrain. The 6 fixation in the broadest sense is how I live and perceive but in some ways it feels like just a scab covering the 4 fixation that I also live and perceive much less pleasantly. Might have to gather my thoughts and make another blank space post in a few wks or something.
 

Noon

New member
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
790
Actually, sorry for the double post but I do have a few thoughts right now that I can't help but want to post.

4s are more lone wolfs, rejecting before being rejected, using an identity of refinement to make up for feeling ugly inside, etc, and elitism is more in the demeanor than the action itself

The first two are too true - and I tend to have this subconscious expectation that in most group situations people will as usual just somehow magically be aware that I'm with the group and not in it, so certain things are "just different" when it comes to me. Not an expectation of special treatment as much as... just different treatment. Separate treatment. I wasn't aware of the full extent of this until recently. It's some combination of having been left to my own devices so often as a child and having been the black sheep in so many contexts otherwise.

The bold - feeling ugly inside - is almost funny because of how relevant it's turned out to be. I talked about this before a lot with someone. I tried to explain it as not even really being an appearance or self-esteem thing but something a lot more abstract. Said I even felt ashamed of writing poetry and collecting art because they're so beautiful and I felt ugly, profane, something like that. I don't know that I want to appear refined, I just like certain things and in the process, oddly, don't always feel 'worthy' of them because of how ideal they are while I'm not. He thought it was strange that I could see 'so much beauty everywhere' but was so discriminating when it came to myself. And two 4s I used to know, one felt something similar and the other never said so directly but wrote something portraying himself as a proud warts-and-all outcast who'd outgrown the compulsion to be 'beautiful' (as the Others hadn't). That's in both cases sort of how we instantly felt alike.

The person who probably knows me best after myself is a 4. We have our differences - like I believe he's more open to all aspects of himself and more feeling-centered - but I wonder how much of it boils down to INFJ vs INFP.
 

Kullervo

Permabanned
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
3,298
MBTI Type
N/A
Actually, sorry for the double post but I do have a few thoughts right now that I can't help but want to post.



The first two are too true - and I tend to have this subconscious expectation that in most group situations people will as usual just somehow magically be aware that I'm with the group and not in it, so certain things are "just different" when it comes to me. Not an expectation of special treatment as much as... just different treatment. Separate treatment. I wasn't aware of the full extent of this until recently. It's some combination of having been left to my own devices so often as a child and having been the black sheep in so many contexts otherwise.

The bold - feeling ugly inside - is almost funny because of how relevant it's turned out to be. I talked about this before a lot with someone. I tried to explain it as not even really being an appearance or self-esteem thing but something a lot more abstract. Said I even felt ashamed of writing poetry and collecting art because they're so beautiful and I felt ugly, profane, something like that. I don't know that I want to appear refined, I just like certain things and in the process, oddly, don't always feel 'worthy' of them because of how ideal they are while I'm not. He thought it was strange that I could see 'so much beauty everywhere' but was so discriminating when it came to myself. And two 4s I used to know, one felt something similar and the other never said so directly but wrote something portraying himself as a proud warts-and-all outcast who'd outgrown the compulsion to be 'beautiful' (as the Others hadn't). That's in both cases sort of how we instantly felt alike.

The person who probably knows me best after myself is a 4. We have our differences - like I believe he's more open to all aspects of himself and more feeling-centered - but I wonder how much of it boils down to INFJ vs INFP.

Some points you should bear in mind:
Writing poetry and having a strong sense of aesthetics is not indicative of E4 (what and how you write might be, of course).
Feeling self-hatred is less of a 4 trait than a generally depressive trait.
6s are inclined to question what is wrong with others/the world, whereas 4s will question what is wrong with themselves.
6s and 4s both suffer from leaving the present moment; however while 6s try to imagine their future, 4s reflect on their past.

Here's another post from PerC on this.

A lot of Sixes are mistyping as Fours. One of the reason for mistyping is due to how type 4 is frequently described. The picture of a romantic, feeling, artistic and melancholic type is especially appealing to all NF types regardless if they are actually 4s or not. On the other hand a lot of type 6 descriptions tend to give a rather SJ picture of a dutiful and loyal person. But even if you scratch off such rather stereotypical portrays there are a lot of 6s who will point out how much they can relate to the 4 descriptions.

The interesting thing for me is how many people relate to the 4 descriptions but interpret them in a sixish way. A while ago I realized that there are similar words used to describe 4s and 6s which makes for some confusion. After some great help I can hopefully make better sense of it now.

being different – being deviating
understanding yourself – knowing yourself
to be authentic – to be true to yourself

It’s not a matter which set of terms you like better but what pattern lies behind those.

Being different – being deviating
Fours have a deep-ingrained feeling that there’s something wrong with them. They don’t know what it is, but it’s at the root of their alienation and their feeling of being different. Sixes on the other hand are a relating type and notice how they deviate from the norm and how they are different from others. It becomes noticeable in how both types react towards a changing or fixing. For Sixes it’s about getting rid of their flaws and fixing the things that make them deviate (Of course there’s also the counter version 6 who is deliberately deviating from the norm), whereas Fours don’t know what’s wrong with them. So how could you fix it anyway? But even if it would be possible there’s a repulsion coming up because it is so deeply ingrained in them, it’s part of who they are and getting rid of it would mean getting rid of who they are.

Understanding yourself – knowing yourself
The core fear of Sixes is of not knowing themselves and of not having an inner guidance. Knowing themselves means for Sixes to get a better sense of their self, to know what they are and want and of not following someone else’s lead or idea. Understanding for Fours means to understand what’s wrong with them. In comparison with Sixes they have a strong sense of self though they don’t think they understand themselves because understanding themselves would mean they would understand what makes them wrong.
Getting healthy 6s will get a stronger sense of self while 4s realize there’s nothing wrong with them at all.

To be authentic – to be true to yourself
Being true to yourself ties in with the 6s fear of following someone’s elses lead and of not having an inner guidance. If they are in accordance with their own self and their own lead they are true to themselves. 4s as image-type are concerned about presenting themselves as authentic (being authentic) and of not showing off an artifical image.
 

KitchenFly

Member
Joined
Feb 5, 2015
Messages
876
The differences between Four vs Six is interesting.

melancholy vs doubt

melancholy is like known, "know the value" of subjective feeling sensed via and at the primary action of point three of the feeling triad. Having extended connections with its host primary energy point three's subsidiary wings point five and point one type four has an auxiliary connection with point five that affects both mood and agenda for the four and its connection at point one touches upon the relative relating dynamic component of primary point threes role as mass within the mass energy direct cognition tri-factor. within provides the fours sense of self, self has a concrete platform of bias; true or false the subjective is cleanly understood because the four is most out of touch with feeling and stands also within the Id grouping, a second bias is at work my identity my self detached from a complete, the sum is understood "i am Defective" fours deeper reason there is more that the one jigsaw puzzle i can see sense experience obstruct or comprehend,...there is some thing defective about me is the value believed. yet to be recognised is the full fixed design.

and doubt is like power of an understanding I am the value exspirienced i can not separate myself from an awareness that I am feeling the thought of that i am the subjective "the known value" thought felt via and at the primary action of point six of the thinking triad. Having only connection within its own host energy primary energy point six's subsidiary wing's, point eight and point four, type six has an auxiliary connection with point five that affects both mood and agenda for the six and its connection at point nine touches upon the relative relating dynamic component of primary point six role as energy the mass energy direct cognition tri-factor. Within provides the six feeling of self, self has a concrete platform of bias; correct or incorrect the objective is cleanly understood because the six is most underdeveloped with thinking and stands also within the supper ego grouping, a second bias is at work my authority my self detached from a complete, the sum is understood "i am incomplete" six's deeper reasoning i am seperated i am alive. I can think feel experience connect or destroy,... there is divide and life is devoid of correct cohesion, i have reason to sought is a natural progression of thought. yet to be recognised is the full fixed design.


the numbers four and six are interesting 6 + 4 = 10 and 6 - 4 = 2 Add 10 and two and the sum equals 12 a one and a two as like a hole and a multiplicity of two. its symbolic irony is interesting from an abstract metaphysical properties of numbers perspective. At the achetypal pie level.
 

Noon

New member
Joined
Jul 23, 2010
Messages
790
Some points you should bear in mind:

Painting e4 as an espresso-sipping all-black-like-my-soul drama student is what I'm trying to intellectually subvert. Myself, I just happen to be into poetry; that's consequently going to be the context I'm speaking in.

Self-hatred is not the right word for it. If Beautiful is shorthand for the entire spectrum of good to right to ideal to sublime, Ugly is shorthand for the opposite. Flawed, imperfect, awkward, [made] wrong, fell short. Different with negative consequences. Those are my words at least. From 4s I've heard anything from "freak" to "monster" (facetiously). The 'proud outcast' came from an extremely conformist environment.

If it were as simple as self-hatred there'd be no underside of pride. No progression to idealizing the flawed either.

Marilyn Manson (4w5) inverted 'the culture of beauty' via 'The Beautiful People'. Kazu Makino (4w5) wrote about inside matching outside in 'Elephant Woman'. Franz Kafka (4/5) wrote 'The Metamorphosis'. Warsan Shire (4) has references in her poetry to being something 'terrifying and strange and beautiful'.

4s can throw themselves into the future too, difference being in its state as a fantasy future as opposed to a desire to know a future coming up based on the present. The reflection on the past isn't immediate. Certain people, events, and times can be mythologized into recurrent themes so that the past is also constantly the present; not like taking time out to look back on last month.

I wrote a non-SJcentric depiction of E6's defining feature here:

[Essence 2] is a perpetual state of synthesizing the disparate into the cohesive - to varying levels of success.

These because the 6 is ultimately aiming to achieve a 9: perception of the biggest picture and total reconciliation therein. That means "needing to see the unseen," which can replicate itself as lesser little anxieties.

If they resemble a flux of opposites it's because they embody that aspiration with their very selves: they exist as the process of seeking all-pervasive cognizance; a constant seeking for "mini 9s" in terms of personality (phobic/cp), of ideology ("true"/"false"), of psychology (doubt/conviction), of personal ties (allies/threats), and beyond.

That unconscious preoccupation with opposing principles comes from wanting to see both sides of the coin simultaneously. It differs from the 5's seeking of omniscience by being more about perception than intellect.

Not gonna quote it in full though cause I don't like how convoluted I made the wording.

So - I'm biased neither against 6 nor in favor of 4. What I want is to go beyond their surfaces. My reasons for asking about 4 aren't based on romanticism.
 

anastasiaromanova

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
55
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
641
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
Speaking very loosely, because obviously complicated by issues of tritype, stacking, wing, and movement of the main type in core dynamics, 6s live in fear of f-ing up an idealized hypothetical perfect future if they make a wrong move; 4s live in mourning of an idealized embellished perfect past that they feel they must constantly recreate. Both are thus stuck in a limbo without presence; the quagmire of E4 is past-centered; that of E6 is future-centered. E6--what should I do to prove that I am? E4--who have I been that proves that I am? A triple doubt 4 can seem more doubting than a 6; a 4-fixed sx 6 can seem more melancholic than a 4. But make no mistake: the core issue of E6 is lack of support to step into the future, to act in order to be. Action is not a core issue for E4 because being is introjected. E4 is imploded; E6 is paralyzed. E6 has a running dialogue in its head; E4 has a running movie--an autobiographical one. Either may also have both; the issue is which one is the most essential.
 

anastasiaromanova

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2015
Messages
55
MBTI Type
ENFP
Enneagram
641
Instinctual Variant
sx/so
And one last thing--when you are dealing with the sp/sx 4, you may find yourself in a somewhat different universe from your garden variety E4 precious rose blooming to wither in fleeting time. There is a lot to be said for sp/sx 4 "counter-melancholy" ime and this is often a very Oneish configuration, even when the gut fix isn't One, so...
 
Top