User Tag List

Results 1 to 9 of 9

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    640

    Default STACKEMUP TYPOLOGY (ENNEAGRAM-SIDE) VS. R & H

    In looking at the hardrive for the inner logic of each enneagram type, Stackemup Typology (Enneagram-side) identifies the hard-drives as core distortions. R & H identifies the hard-drives as fear motives.

    Stackemup Typology: Distortions
    R & H: Fear
    (Naranjo: Passions/vices)

    In my core primer for all the gestalts, Stackemup Typology (Enneagram-side) laid out the core distortions for all nine enneagram types (nobody before had been able to do so):

    Type 2: "I"m not capable of validating myself."
    Type 3: "I am a superior being."
    Type 4: "I am an ugly duckling; defective."
    Type 5: "There's a gulf/separation between my mind and the physical world around me."
    Type 6: "the world is a dangerous place."
    Type 7: "God is against me. I am against God."
    Type 8: "Might makes right."
    Type 9: This point on the enneagram has no in-built distortion; the core approach is vacillation
    Type 1: "somebody must be punished for the world's imperfections and flaws."


    A Primer On The Core Gestalts For Each E-Type And More

    CANON NUMBER 1 OF TYPOLOGICAL CONSTRUCTION: YOU CANNOT HAVE TWO DIFFERENT PERSONALITY STYLES WITH THE SAME CORE DISTORTION.

    My approach is clearly the correct one.

    R & H's descriptions in PTypes entangles multiple types into single types and represents every type as driven by fear. fear of failure (threes) fear of losing support (six) fear of, fear of....Essentially, R & H took Naranjo's Six and turned that into all nine of their enneagram types. That's the flaw in R & H's system and its a major one. For example, the R & H's three is driven by a fear of failure. So the average to below average levels of health are predicated upon the 3's contraphobic reaction to its fear of failure, until finally, it either succumbs to its fear of failure in the lowest levels or gets out of its fear loopp in the highest levels. This is the pattern for every type in R & H. THAT MAKES EVERY TYPE IN R & H A SIX...that's the major flaw in R & H's approach. R & H is fundamentally incapable of conceiving of personality type as having any other root but fear.

    R & H also sold the enneagram out when they endorsed the Fauvre's Tritype which is patronizing towards people who actually suffer from multiple personality disorder. Right, because it's a foregone conclusion that three different personality types cannot co-exist in the same person unless that person suffers from multiple personality disorder. Mountains of research already show that this doesn't happen absent extraordinary sexual and/or physical abuse in childhood. Until the fauvres can come forward with evidence to contradict that, the chance that everybody on the planet has multiple personality disorder is extremely low.

    Just to drive the point home I can back my approach up with a 2500+ exemplars breakdown. Neither R & H nor Naranjo presented any type of systematic breakdown for every type wing and stack. If they don't have a vision for every type wing and stack, the rest is window dressing. I've also got the only valid VI typing model for all stackings. I'm beating the hell out of them in terms of substance.
    Click here for my 2500+ Enneagram Type List to type yourself and others with. It's the only valid breakdown for every enneagram type, wing and stack.

    Click here for the only valid visual typing model of stackings on earth and socionics.
    Click here for enneagram type descriptions as a supplement to the only valid breakdown for every type, wing and stack.
    Click here for my typings of 100+ fictional exemplars and here for my typings of 90+ typology central members.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    17,678

    Default

    Everyone is broken. I think not.
    Pressure changes everything. Some people focus, others fold.

  3. #3
    I am Fay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    MBTI
    INFP
    Enneagram
    4w3 so/sx
    Socionics
    IEI Fe
    Posts
    3,313

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jaguar View Post
    Everyone is broken. I think not.
    Well, that's kinda' the point of Enneagram, isn't it? I'm not saying it's right, just that the theory revolves around it. It also gives you plenty of space to self improvement and growth and directs you towards it.
    Likes Amberiat liked this post

  4. #4
    🌼🐇 Luminous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    MBTI
    dɟu
    Enneagram
    925 sx/sp
    Posts
    7,653

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tomb1 View Post
    Type 7: "God is against me. I am against God."


    So is this going to be a pay per view? Boxing? Ultimate fighting? Wrestling? Ooooh, maybe a ladder match?

  5. #5
    Infinity Amberiat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2018
    MBTI
    INTP
    Enneagram
    9w8 sx/so
    Socionics
    LII Ne
    Posts
    1,456

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tomb1 View Post
    My approach is clearly the correct one.
    I've also got the only valid VI typing model for all stackings. I'm beating the hell out of them in terms of substance.
    Johari | Nohari

    9w8-5w6-3w4 sx/so

    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    640

    Default

    If you disagree with Stackemup Typology (Enneagram-Side)'s approach, please produce a 2500+ exemplar breakdown for every type wing and stack for prequalification to disagree. If your breakdown is half-way decent (though there's none except mine which is valid), I will give your point serious consideration. Otherwise a house without a foundation is deemed a castle in the sky.

    Tell you what, as a running special, I am willing to lower the price of admission to just a decent 1500+ exemplar breakdown for every type wing and stack.

    In other words, back your disagreement up with substance so that everybody knows that your disagreement isn't just based on false pride (or something hollow like that).

    Okay okay, I'll do even one better, if you don't have your own list, please email whichever author you wish to advocate for (R & H, Fauvres, Naranjo, Palmer) and tell 'em to send you over their 2500+ exemplar breakdown for every type wing and stack, give or take 500+ exemplars.
    Click here for my 2500+ Enneagram Type List to type yourself and others with. It's the only valid breakdown for every enneagram type, wing and stack.

    Click here for the only valid visual typing model of stackings on earth and socionics.
    Click here for enneagram type descriptions as a supplement to the only valid breakdown for every type, wing and stack.
    Click here for my typings of 100+ fictional exemplars and here for my typings of 90+ typology central members.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Jaguar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    17,678

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fay View Post
    Well, that's kinda' the point of Enneagram, isn't it?
    Oh, please.
    Pressure changes everything. Some people focus, others fold.

  8. #8
    Gothic Evil tigergreengrass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    MBTI
    INTJ
    Enneagram
    3w4 so/sx
    Socionics
    ILI Ni
    Posts
    220

    Default

    I don't see why anyone takes these narcissistic ramblings from Tomb seriously.
    MBTI - INTJ
    Socionics - ILI-Ni
    Enneagram: 3w4-1w2-7w8 so/sx
    Jungian Archetype: Magician
    Likes Bismuth Blitz, RadicalDoubt liked this post

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    640

    Default

    In Stackemup Typology (enneagram-side), fear is only part of the trait structure for type six. For R & H, fear is part of the trait/psychic structure of every type. R & H's position is absurd. Furthermore, R & H entangles multiple types into single types. Real quick, I'll own R & H on its description of type 3.

    Let's turn to R & H's core primer for Type 3 found on the enneagraminstitute.com site:

    Basic Fear: Of being worthless
    Basic Desire: To feel valuable and worthwhile
    Enneagram Three with a Two-Wing: "The Charmer"
    Enneagram Three with a Four-Wing: "The Professional"
    Key Motivations: Want to be affirmed, to distinguish themselves from others, to have attention, to be admired, and to impress others.
    In R & H, the fear "of being worthless" drives threes to "make sure their lives are a success." According to R & H, "[Threes] want success because they are afraid of disappearing into a chasm of emptiness and worthlessness: without the increased attention and feeling of accomplishment which success usually brings, Threes fear that they are nobody and have no value."

    R & H has the enneatype all wrong. FEAR IS NOT AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THE TRAIT/PSYCHIC STRUCTURE OF THE TYPE THREE PERSONALITY STYLE.
    R & H has simply described a six whose central fear trait has been sublimated into/engulfed by issues regarding success-failure.

    Let's turn to Stackemup Typology (Enneagram)'s core primer for Type 3:

    Type 3: The Self-Confident Gestalt.
    Core Strategy: Outshining others
    Core Distortion: “I am a superior being.”
    Area of fixation: Expansion/Fantasy
    Core Action Set: putting others on notice that they are a superior being and admiration their due, that others need to be rolling out the red carpet for them.
    DSM Correlate: Narcissistic Personality Disorder
    Core Trap: Weaving together new fantastic rationales for their circumstances in order to recast themselves as the star.
    Core Vulnerability: disdain from others
    2 wingers are hyper-competitive, bragging, skilled at gamesmanship, and political (they know how to work and motivate people).
    4 wingers are poised, calculating, efficient and oriented towards outward self-improvement.
    In Stackemup Typology, the distortion of "I am a Superior Being" drives the three to "seek out the admiration that they believe others owe them."

    A Primer On The Core Gestalts For Each E-Type And More
    Stackemup Enneagram Description For Enneatype III

    Fear is no way intricate to the trait/psychic structure because 3s are not working out of a distortion that "the world is a dangerous place"(like type 6).

    R & H's type 3 description also entangles multiple types. I've already demonstrated the entanglement of type six into that type and all of R & H's types.

    But R & H also cannot provide a sufficient explanation for R & H's type 3 arrogance. Given that R & H's three is "pursuing the values that others reward," there's no logical explanation for how the type ends up as the most arrogant type in R & H's enneagram! The assertion of a causal relationship between these two phenomenon is nothing short of fantastical. Arrogance and contempt for others is clearly type 3, but "pursuing the values that others reward" gets into type 9. R & H tries to fill in this description hole with a pop-throwaway that "arrogance and contempt for others is a defense against feeling jealous of others and their success" but that's just a Red Herring. You could just as easily say that every type experiences arrogance and contempt for those who appear to have what they want.

    In Stackemup Typology (Enneagram-Side), the 3's arrogance arises out of "their own cocksure belief of their superiority." Unlike R & H's description for type 3, Arrogance in the Stackemup 3 follows logically from the Stackemup 3's core distortion that "I am a superior being," as follows:

    Three are cocky. The admiration they receive through success cements their own cocksure belief of their superiority. They start to give others the impression that it's a pleasure to do business with the three as if others ought to be willing to take less just to have that luxury. Their former self-confidence is replaced by arrogance. They have begun to rationalize their failures. They spend a lot of time making their failures seem like successes.

    My description makes sense....it just has a ring of truth to it. R & H's description for type 3 sloppily combines E6 (fear trait), E3 (Arrogance), and E9 (merging with others' agenda) into one type description.
    Click here for my 2500+ Enneagram Type List to type yourself and others with. It's the only valid breakdown for every enneagram type, wing and stack.

    Click here for the only valid visual typing model of stackings on earth and socionics.
    Click here for enneagram type descriptions as a supplement to the only valid breakdown for every type, wing and stack.
    Click here for my typings of 100+ fictional exemplars and here for my typings of 90+ typology central members.

Similar Threads

  1. [Enne] INTP Enneagram 5 vs. 6
    By highlander in forum Enneatypes
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 04-23-2012, 08:39 AM
  2. [INTJ] INTJ Enneagram 1 vs 5 vs 8
    By highlander in forum The NT Rationale (ENTP, INTP, ENTJ, INTJ)
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 02-09-2012, 06:44 PM
  3. [INFP] INFP Enneagram 4 vs 9 vs 2 vs 5
    By highlander in forum The NF Idyllic (ENFP, INFP, ENFJ, INFJ)
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-04-2012, 05:28 PM
  4. [E2] Enneagram 4s vs. 2s
    By PoprocksAndCoke in forum Enneatypes
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-17-2009, 11:44 AM
  5. Enneagram 5 vs Enneagram 8
    By Schizm in forum Enneagram
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-16-2007, 05:48 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Single Sign On provided by vBSSO