Mal12345
Permabanned
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2011
- Messages
- 14,532
- MBTI Type
- IxTP
- Enneagram
- 5w4
- Instinctual Variant
- sx/sp
My first exposure to this movie, besides previews that I barely paid attention to because of possible spoilers and a general lack of interest in continuing to watch this series, came from this thread:
http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/arts-and-entertainment/77406-terminator-genisys-goes.html
My first thought about that thread was to keep an open mind. So I read a synopsis of the movie somewhere online, liked what I read, and decided to watch this one, although I skipped Terminator Salvation.
I found that skipping Salvation didn't matter one iota. If you've watched the original Terminator (1984) and are at least cognizant of the main plot points of Terminator 2: Judgment Day, then Genisys will be easy to follow from that standpoint.
However -
Many time-lines makes things confusing. So don't be caught unaware as I was. I knew in general what was coming before I went in, but like the human characters in the movie, I found it all to be rather mind-bending.
[Insert unoriginal comment from a responder who will state that it was not mind-bending to the responder, and who will then state that it's not worth the time trying to explain it to me.]
Having taken a leaf from the Star Trek franchise's 'book', the existence of time travel and the theoretical possibility of alternate time-lines makes for new movie possibilities, thus opportunities for making a profit without having to take a risk on something new (e.g., John Carter).
Despite my intense dislike of Jason Clarke who portrayed John Connor, and the fact that in some ways the movie is typical Hollywood schlock, the characters held my interest, I loved Schwartzenegger whose aged appearance fits the role he played perfectly (the Guardian), and the story held my interest for the entire 2 hours.
The blatant Pepsi Maxx advertising was uncalled for and detracted from the whole.
The idea of 'Genisys' did not turn out to be what I thought it would be.
http://www.typologycentral.com/forums/arts-and-entertainment/77406-terminator-genisys-goes.html
My first thought about that thread was to keep an open mind. So I read a synopsis of the movie somewhere online, liked what I read, and decided to watch this one, although I skipped Terminator Salvation.
I found that skipping Salvation didn't matter one iota. If you've watched the original Terminator (1984) and are at least cognizant of the main plot points of Terminator 2: Judgment Day, then Genisys will be easy to follow from that standpoint.
However -
Many time-lines makes things confusing. So don't be caught unaware as I was. I knew in general what was coming before I went in, but like the human characters in the movie, I found it all to be rather mind-bending.
[Insert unoriginal comment from a responder who will state that it was not mind-bending to the responder, and who will then state that it's not worth the time trying to explain it to me.]
Having taken a leaf from the Star Trek franchise's 'book', the existence of time travel and the theoretical possibility of alternate time-lines makes for new movie possibilities, thus opportunities for making a profit without having to take a risk on something new (e.g., John Carter).
Despite my intense dislike of Jason Clarke who portrayed John Connor, and the fact that in some ways the movie is typical Hollywood schlock, the characters held my interest, I loved Schwartzenegger whose aged appearance fits the role he played perfectly (the Guardian), and the story held my interest for the entire 2 hours.
The blatant Pepsi Maxx advertising was uncalled for and detracted from the whole.
The idea of 'Genisys' did not turn out to be what I thought it would be.