Arthur Schopenhauer
What is, is.
- Joined
- May 1, 2010
- Messages
- 1,158
- MBTI Type
- INTJ
- Enneagram
- 5
I meant to vote INTJ but I accidently hit XNTJ.
Soooo....
Soooo....
This thread is retarded.
so are you denying the existance of supergenius intelligence?
Or are you saying every type has the potential to become a genius (even a retarded kid)
or there is no such thing as intelligence
or intelligence cannot be quantitatively measured
or intelligence is not limited to one type (which i doubt is false, bell curve theory)
or what?
I can't figure it out
You need to look at the third column in my data to find the % of gifted students relative to their %
...
e same, mine is just sorted by a type's tendency for giftedness relative to its % of the population as a whole.
It's all about how you slice the data. And I've sliced it in the most relevant way.
In your continuum of stupid threads this has got to top the list, cloud.
You're getting crap responses because your premise is profoundly flawed.
What do you expect?
This thread is ridiculous and I can't seem to find a coherent argument for or against any one type. My tentative conclusion would be that this thread has attracted more simpleminded emotional, territorial posters than the rape threads and should be abandoned by anyone with an IQ or hair-follicle count above 100.
Why?SiG's would be interested in advancing concrete knowledge and problems posed in the moat precise of languages, mathematics
You're just understandably jealous that you're not intp, the obvious, research-backed answer to the OP.
Someone mentioned philosophers as potential SiG candidates. No SiG would waste his time attempting to create self-consistent systems to encapsulate and justify their personal, emotionally derived value system. Especially since a) the investment of individuals into their own value system, regardless of internal consistency makes philosophy not convincing and hence not useful, and b) the obvious inherent ambiguity of language makes such an exercise without a sound foundation on which to begin.
That's right, I'm calling people interested in philosophy dumb.
SiG's would be interested in advancing concrete knowledge and problems posed in the moat precise of languages, mathematics
Why?
NF can't become genius because they can't control their feelings.
You ever seen an NF that invented Calculus.
You have to be logical and dobjective to look at things. artistic genius yes, but not scientific and high IQ.
You're just understandably jealous that you're not intp, the obvious, research-backed answer to the OP.
Someone mentioned philosophers as potential SiG candidates. No SiG would waste his time attempting to create self-consistent systems to encapsulate and justify their personal, emotionally derived value system. Especially since a) the investment of individuals into their own value system, regardless of internal consistency makes philosophy not convincing and hence not useful, and b) the obvious inherent ambiguity of language makes such an exercise without a sound foundation on which to begin.
That's right, I'm calling people interested in philosophy dumb.
SiG's would be interested in advancing concrete knowledge and problems posed in the moat precise of languages, mathematics
This is one of the best threads i ever made.
I must be too stupid to understand this because it just looks like a load of crap to me.