I can understand the Si-Dom part, but I have to wonder about the Fe vs Te
* Can't really tell the line where jokes start becoming offensive, have burned bridges by telling apparently innappropriate ones
Would this be because of the lack of Se?
* Prefer strategy board games to games of chance
Again, the lack of Se, one can almost see Te here.
Would be interesting to get the age of the person as well.
I consider it a sign of poor Fe to not know lack of appropriateness (thats a value and involves reading others' values through emotional signals and awareness of common values). However, some Fe types are so hyper-aware they are easily embarrassed and underrate themselves, but that doesnt seem the case with the OP.
Strategy games seem preferred by J types in general, but probably some edge to Te. Id guess any type but typical FPs could have various levels of interest in such games.
Given that she read as male to me, perhaps a female thinking type, yes. I dont get a strong sense of the auxiliary, but e9s can be hard to determine a Jungian type for.
I still see a Si-dom, but sure, maybe ISTJ. Enneagram 9 seems obvious, which makes for a more laid back ISxJ, not the more stereotypical decisive J type.
Her written style is concrete and very literal. It is clear and has little ambiguity. An NTP is a ridiculous typing. Most self-described supposedly Ne qualities here sound more like inferior Ne (slight paranoias, humor, and occasional whimsical musings), not a mindset dominated by it.
Edit - okay, I see the OP is considering ISFJ...I think that's probably it then.
I have really really poor usage of Fe though, thats a problem.
Its more mindset, not usage (not a SKILL). Talking to others to sort thoughts implies extroversion or extroverted judging (fe or te). Being readily bored is probably a perceiving dominant (S or N dominant). Your communication style says more than what details you give, and you come across as very much a sensing type.
Glad someone bumped it because I was going to if no one else did. There's no way you're an ESTJ. And I HIGHLY doubt you're an ISxJ like [MENTION=6561]OrangeAppled[/MENTION] was saying. I think you're most likely an ENTP, from your various survey results. I do see Si in there, but your modus operandi seems to be Ne. The way that you post on this forum seems Ne -- the way that you hop from topic to topic and the way that your sense of humor works. Speaking as an SJ, I get zero indicators of SJ from you.Bump because I suck
Glad someone bumped it because I was going to if no one else did. There's no way you're an ESTJ. And I HIGHLY doubt you're an ISxJ like [MENTION=6561]OrangeAppled[/MENTION] was saying. I think you're most likely an ENTP, from your various survey results. I do see Si in there, but your modus operandi seems to be Ne. The way that you post on this forum seems Ne -- the way that you hop from topic to topic and the way that your sense of humor works. Speaking as an SJ, I get zero indicators of SJ from you.
Also, I merged your two type-me threads. (Not that this is in any way scientific, but one of the many reasons why you don't vibe SJ to me is the fact that you created a second typing thread instead of bumping your previous one.)
If I recall, Isabel Myers attributes this jumping between unrelated topics in conversation to inferior Ne, aka, Si-dominants.
Ne types dont randomly jump from topic to topic, rather, they see parallels between things and may not bother to point out connections, seeing them as "obvious". If you follow them, it will all connect to a major theme. Si types can be truly more random, jumping between topics without any big picture to tie them together, just creating a linear string of randomness. She also noted how intuition may come out the most in a Sensing type via their humor. This agrees with my observation of conversation styles of types in person, with NPs more inclined to create larger themes with tangents and digressions to expound on it, and SJs having lots of micro-topics strung together with vaguely related details, but no uniting theme.
The idea that Ne=randomness is a an idea perpetuated with no real foundation in theory, and it leads to over-typing of NPs.
Randonmess is more likely to indicate an irrational type, aka a P-dom, and outwardly this may be Pe-dom, true, but things like conversation and humor, etc, will reveal Pi-dom as irrational types also. Does this style not seem SJ or does it not seem Je-dom? To me it seems consistent with ISxJs, especially an enneagram 9.
Considering enneagram 9 has not even been questioned, this also creates likelihood of Si-dom over Ne-dom.
I worry about it, think about everything that could go wrong, but then I think about everything that could be gained and I just go
If I recall, Isabel Myers attributes this jumping between unrelated topics in conversation to inferior Ne, aka, Si-dominants.
Ne types dont randomly jump from topic to topic, rather, they see parallels between things and may not bother to point out connections, seeing them as "obvious". If you follow them, it will all connect to a major theme. Si types can be truly more random, jumping between topics without any big picture to tie them together, just creating a linear string of randomness. She also noted how intuition may come out the most in a Sensing type via their humor. This agrees with my observation of conversation styles of types in person, with NPs more inclined to create larger themes with tangents and digressions to expound on it, and SJs having lots of micro-topics strung together with vaguely related details, but no uniting theme.
The idea that Ne=randomness is a an idea perpetuated with no real foundation in theory, and it leads to over-typing of NPs.
Randonmess is more likely to indicate an irrational type, aka a P-dom, and outwardly this may be Pe-dom, true, but things like conversation and humor, etc, will reveal Pi-dom as irrational types also. Does this style not seem SJ or does it not seem Je-dom? To me it seems consistent with ISxJs, especially an enneagram 9.
Considering enneagram 9 has not even been questioned, this also creates likelihood of Si-dom over Ne-dom.
Ok. This is what I think. From the beginning you typed me as an Si-dom. I have no problem with the idea of being this type. But, I think that you are looking to type me as an SJ, because you personally feel that there is some sort of discrepancy between the number of self reported Si-doms and self reported NFs and NTs. It seems as if you have a bit of a personal crusade going to fill some sort of Si quota. I might be totally off base here, but I would guess that you primarily based your typing off of my first post and the answer I gave in the question about love. From then on you stuck to the one one type, and just disregarded and/or manipulated whatever else was said that did not fit into that mold. Not saying that I belive this to be intentional. It seems less likely to me that a sensor would mistype as an intuitive than the intuitive would just type correctly in the first place. The nature of a forum about typology would just seem like it would attract more intuitives and would generally just be less likely to be of interest to sensors. I did look up a bit about enneagrams, and I could see 9w1, but I tried to refrain from questioning peoples typyong so as not to taint the ideas thrown out on the thread. I am sure that you have an extensive array of knowledge about typology and I sincerely appreciate you taking the time to type me so thank you.
No, I have no "crusade". I mentioned in another thread that I'm actually cautious to type people as SJ (or sensing types in general) around here because of an awareness that so many mistype as Ns and not wanting to go to the other extreme, as well as because of reactions like this. No one wants to be a sensing type, because by the time they've arrived here they've decided being intuitive is somehow more "special". All they want is confirmation of this.
I didn't primarily base my typing off of your first answer about love at all. I explained how I came to this conclusion pretty thoroughly, and I didn't disregard anything that did not "fit the mold", rather I noted misunderstandings of what Ne and Si mentalities actually look like, aka, I questioned the "mold" others use.
So yes, you are totally off-base.