Feeling does not equal emotion. Feeling is about ethic, and value-based judgment: what things mean to people.
Yeah, but Yoda don't do value-based judgement. Elsewhere, Thinkers are concerned about ethics too, but it is based on principles, not on values. As it is the case in Yoda.
Maintaining calm and serenity does not mean the F functions are not involved in decision-making.
It's not only about maintaining calm and serenity. It said "no feeling", so to avoid feeling in the judgment process. A person who do that is a Thinker, not a F. And true Feelers like Anakin have a problem with that.
And we can look at any impassioned INTP and see the reverse is true, as well. And all types can value peace. My ESFJ boyfriend is very much about peace - he is a 9w1, after all.
So Yoda could be any type. Except that there's crucials clues that he's not a Feeler.
Since when have INTPs had a monopoly on knowledge?
I simply mean that Yoda is not necessarly INFJ, bu as I said
there's crucials clues that he's not a Feeler
Again, passion is not monopolized by F types.
Indeed, but the jedi code prescribe to avoid it in the decision-making process. Which is hard for a F but is not for Yoda, who is a T.
Actually, the change of frame of reference is very INxJ. It's a new way of looking at things.
Being interested by an alternative way to look at things is typycally NP.
Just because he is less emotional does not make him a T.
So, what makes him a F?
My ESFJ 9w1 boyfriend is far less emotional than my INTP 6w5 dad, who is regularly in some fiery state. I am not avoiding that argument; I am saying it is a logical fallacy. Feeling is not emotion. They are two totally separate concepts, though they can involve one another. The same holds true for believing that a "harsh" teacher could only be a T. I am a fan of sink-or-swim, too, and I am an F! If you have faith that the person can succeed - a typical NF sort of belief - then there is no cruelty in sink-or-swim, because you know that the person will be just fine. It's not about social skills at all, it's about the application of NF style humanistic growth to an individual. Your arguments here are rooted purely in stereotype.
You're just saying "Yoda is not necessarly a T" without bring any proof that he is a F.
F is about being driven by emotions in the decision making process. Every book say it. If you have sources which say the contray, show it. It's also being driven by subjectivity. There's nothing about this in Yoda. He always stay calm, objective and impartial even in the most difficult situations.
Yoda is the leader of arguably the most powerful underground rebel organization in the galaxy working to stop the growing forces of the Dark Side and actively promoting peace and justice through the utilization of philosophical teachings combined with instructing quasi-martial art training. That makes him primarily a passive and detached analyzer?
Yes, he's just a small creature staying in a swamp. And he perceived a growth of the Dark Side during two centuries without doing anthing.
Once again, Fe is not about emotional attachment. It is about interpersonal harmony. It is about understanding ties between things. Just like this:
It is about emotional attachment, interpersonal harmony is just another side. How Yoda care about "interpersonal harmony". Understand tie between things can be Ne-Fe and INTPs are pattern-seekers.