G
Ginkgo
Guest
DELETED: Disparaging remark about Fox.
+1
DELETED: Disparaging remark about Fox.
I agree with Speed that enneagram matters. There's a big difference between Woody Allen and Clint Eastwood, and enneagram explains why.
I think Woody is INTP and Clint is ISTJ. Megan Fox may well be ISTP.
Meagon Fox has the tactful intelligence of a 5 year old
I could agree with that. I knoww a girl who is ISTP and is totally like Megan Fox, with a bit of Paris Hilton.
What permit you to say that? Of course she's not overgifted, but she's definetly not stupid.
Because SPs have tactful kind of intelligence which she doesn't have. Shes too perky, not SP.
Again, you are putting meaningless generalisations. SPs I know are far to be tactful for the most part, and completely perky.
Well I def don't believe in emneagram as much as MBTI. To me its like mixing in apples and oranges. How the two got mixed together I'm not sure. IMO you can't be 100% sure people are a certain a type you kind of have to speculate based on their behavior. Woody Allen is not ISTP imo, neither is Tom Cruise but they are considered to be by popular belief. Meagon Fox has the tactful intelligence of a 5 year old. I highly doubt she is even an SP.
I think ISTP is probably not a bad guess. I can't remember if she came across as N or not.
Because SPs have tactful kind of intelligence which she doesn't have. Shes too perky, not SP.
From my experience, most of the ISTPs I've known irl tend to not give a shit and say what they want to say. They're not so obsessed with tact. Really goes to most IXTPs.
From my experience, most of the ISTPs I've known irl tend to not give a shit and say what they want to say. They're not so obsessed with tact. Really goes to most IXTPs.
From my experience, most of the ISTPs I've known irl tend to not give a shit and say what they want to say. They're not so obsessed with tact. Really goes to most IXTPs.
Pretty much is, for me. I can sensor it, but only in small doses. I can use Fe, but not often. I will eventually crack.
On prozac or a lot of pot, I can do it for longer periods of time before I lose it lol.....
Jix, let's face it, you are so counterphobe and out-of-touch with your own being that you can't even face the description of your own enneagram type, and therefore, face that you have fears, and are motivated by a basic fear. If you can't do that, stop believing you have the ability to type people "better" than those who have. The only istp's you will even acknowledge are those you consider to be "badass" types, because that validates the fact that you are also "like a badass"..... lmfao. If the description doesn't fit a Clint Eastwood-type model, you just negate it and call it bunk. Lemme tell ya' what, alot of ISTP 6w5's are into math and science, not action. I was always the worst kid in the class at athletics all through school, and couldn't wait until I no longer had PE class. I've never been very active or sports-oriented (the most active i am right now is when I am walking through a mall or walking around at a festival, going to the occasional amusement park, and cleaning house lol... computer repair isn't what I would call necessarily "active", if you call using a screwdriver here and there, "active"). I would rather learn something new than work out at the gym. And I have never been interested in mechanics, etc, until recently. I also like to dress up alot, and I don't usually dress comfortably or athletically-inspired, so I don't even look like the stereotypical istp. I like to live in the city. I enjoy going out in the city, and I don't like nature, insects, wild animals, etc. at all. There are some things I share with most ISTP's, and other things I don't. Imo, you are stereotyping like mad, and it's because you refuse to acknowledge any realms of personality typing other than mbti.
I saw an video once where Diablo Cody interviewed Megan Fox--they're friends who've worked together. Megan came across as quite smart, actually. She seems like the type that really hates the Hollywood game and refuses to play it; therefore, she gets misrepresented a lot in interviews or painted as the bad girl. I came away with a lot of respect for her, and she actually seemed like she'd be a pretty level-headed, cool girl to hang out with. I think ISTP is probably not a bad guess. I can't remember if she came across as N or not.
Not sure why you tards have to get so personal, but good job you just explained that you're a nerd *claps*. I can't face the description? I love my enmeagram type it actually explains me quite well that doesn't mean I'm still not skeptic about emneagram typology. You know that emneagram and MBTI ARE ALL STEREOTYPES in and of itself, so therefore we are all stereotyping other people when we classify them into letter/number groups. The notion of ISTPs being mechanics is a very general notion, so you can't take that example as me being literal i was using it as an example.
So, now he changes his story and suddenly he loves his enneagram type..... hmmmm...... :rolli:
Also emneagram is faulty, not sure how that B.S got considered as legit for determining personality.
Well I def don't believe in emneagram as much as MBTI. To me its like mixing in apples and oranges. How the two got mixed together I'm not sure.
I love my enmeagram type it actually explains me quite well that doesn't mean I'm still not skeptic about emneagram typology.
First you call enneagram "B.S." = bullshit, and say you don't know how enneagram "got considered as legit for determining personality." That's a strong stance against it.
Then, you say you don't believe in enneagram as much as MBTI.
Lastly, you say you "love" your enneagram type.
So you go from calling it bullshit, and saying you have no idea why it is considered legit for determining personality, to loving it, and believing it "describes you quite well" within a few hours.
I agree that perhaps I'm not understanding you, but if you aren't describing your full take on enneagram, and just blurbing here and there, totally opposite stances on it, it's not my problem that I'm a BIT confused. :yim_rolling_on_the_