I'm not attached to him. I'm defending him because I don't think he's a malicious troll, I think he's sincere, and yes he does do intentionally disruptive things, but he does it because he really feels that way and will use questionable methods so that people hear what he's saying.
That's just what Vic wants us to believe, so he can continue damaging our lives and minds, or at least trying to. Vic is up to no-good. He's getting a big, fat jolly everytime he disrupts. No one who is genuine hurts, so they can help. These two things do not go together. At least, unless they are abusers who have somehow convinced themselves they are helping (ex/ paddling a child). Punishments, such as taking away an ipod for the weekend, supposedly work, but in that case, the parent is doing it "for their own good". I can't imagine a scenario where making me believe that Jung was a molestor would be "for my own good", to the point of causing me emotional distress in order to "learn better". Sounds more like Vic is playing God and doesn't like the idea of Jung being someone's "god". What right does he have to punish me to "teach" me his way? No, I won't join the cult of Victor.
As much as I would take up for Vic because I do feel bad thinking about the boat he's in (sucker I am, eh?), at the same time, I think it's ridiculous how some people are being so easily taken in.
He's a good wordsmith, and yes, he's intelligent. But he's not a creative or original mind, he's just different, and that stirs up curiosities in curious people.