KDude
New member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2010
- Messages
- 8,243
I'm actually the only one who even try to make an argument. People here just saw the opinion about what she looks to be, and followed. Not tried to know what she is.
I don't pretend to know her better, but to be better at typing, which is different.
Like I said, make your own site then. At your own site, you could bypass this issue. Silence the opposition and hold the reins on the truth
I'll make one argument against you. And it ties in to the Kanye argument made above, where Taylor is easily made to look too passive, without any comeback (not even a funny one), and no sense of opportunity in that moment. In your mind, Se is some kind of faggy and "stylish" function, for lack of a better word (or words). I still haven't figured you out, tbh, but that's how it comes off. Then you project this conception of Se on to others, and start producing some questionable typings yourself. ESTPs are usually ranged from aggressively insane like Joe Pesci characters to tough, athletic, and bombastic like Ray Lewis. Or just downright vulgar, like John Belushi. The ones who are questionable ESFJ or ESTP are still a bit swaggery.. like Rachael Ray. Most of the bonafide female celebrities are more like Asia Argento or Mae West. All of them have a kind of attitude to them, no matter how they look. They're not schoolgirls singing about the hundredth emo boy they shed tears for. And then they're not going to get outshined by Kanye West.. not easily at least (Kanye is probably Se/ESFP himself).
You kind of admit she doesn't display some traits, and just chalk it up to her doing a sort of "wholesome" act. That she just wants people to see her as a good girl type. Your argument depends on ascribing dishonesty to her that isn't as evident to me. She seems sincere to me. ymmv