Argument ad Populorum. The unknown number of unspecified people who "would agree" with you is irrelevant.
I pointed that no one who truly know about instinctual variants theory would share your wrong wiews, that's not as populorum.
Bring it on. Show me all these "true Sx/So's" who would agree with you.
Any Sx, actually. Marmie Dearest leaved me a Reputation wich clearly indicate that she find my views about Ayn R more credibles than the yours.
And while you're at it, show me where Helen Palmer even referenced Riso's theory of instinctuals,
the enenagram, understanding yourself and the others, her main book, the introduction.
and then show me where she, or anybody but yourself, said anything about getting a hardon as proof that someone is an Sx-dom.
It's more or less explicitly said in every sites about enneagram, this one for example, expecially in movie character descriptions:
http://www.cee-enneagramme.eu/formation-coaching-enneagramme-et-sous-types/les-3-sous-types/
That is only more Argument ad Populorum. The number of people who have the same personal opinion does not convert the opinion into truth or fact.
Elsewhere, you are the only one dumb enough to believe that bitch is Sx/So.
Your method of cognition consists of feelings and public opinion. And you say you're not an So-dom?
Lol. You really don't understand anything.
I am fairly close to the generation that believed wielding a cigarette holder is a very sensual thing. But you're far too young to know about that.
A cigarette holder was considered as sensual in the mouth of Mae West, not in the Ayn Rand's mouth. Sx and Sx-aux was actor in theses movies, but nobody wanted Ayn Rand, and she just wrote her insipids novels.
To YOU, that is, but not to any instinctual theorist on the planet.
Actually, it is. Every theorist agree that Sx is a primarly concern about desirability.
The very page I cited stated that the Sx/So is trying to support their "uncertain" ideas about sexual relationships.
She hgas not uncertain idea about sexual relationships, she sincerly believe that she knew everything about and that she did'nt need to have real relationships to really know what she talks about.
And now here you are supporting that page which you haven't read. "May exploit and seek to redefine sexuality to reflect their own colorful and UNCERTAIN understanding of it." THAT'S WHAT YOU GET FOR NOT DOING YOUR HOMEWORK.
I've read that page several times and I ve no lesson to take from you.
Clearly, you haven't read anything on the topic of Ayn Rand.
Lol. I read online discussion about Ayn Rand since 2006.
Didn't you know that the saying "didn't you know" is common with the hipster crowd?
That's probably why I find it cool.
By the way, the apostrophe goes after the n - didn't, not did'nt.
An spelling lesson is apparently the maximum that allow you your igorance.