Yea, you hope he won't waste another keystroke. Is it what you would have done? Not bother with me?
Question. Did you read the our first posts on ENTPs? Do you agree with his assessment?
I find this funny. Exactly. I said this to him too. Why bother?
I'm not saying I know you better than yourself. I'm saying you don't know type. There's a difference.
But it's k. It ends here.
"Knowing type" is not some black-and-white binary system. It's not just "know it all" or "know nothing"; there are many varying levels of knowledge, and while I may not understand this particular categorization system on the level that you do, I do understand myself and my own mental processes much
better than you do, as well as general descriptions of each type, to know that I identify better with the ENTP mold than with any other. You're
still making ridiculous assertions that "he can't possibly be ENTP because I'm positive that all ENTPs would behave exactly
this way every time", and I don't know yet if you've picked up on how silly that sounds. I suppose INFJ is the only type that's not constantly predictable for someone of
your intellectual stature.
I may sometimes even mistake certain behaviors of my own for common NT behaviors. You probably think the fact that I'm even admitting that I can be wrong about this makes me somehow SP, since SPs are flexible and NTs are totally inflexible and always concerned only with being right, you know, in
all cases.
Are you sure you're not the one who's putting a little too much faith in his/her own typology wisdom?
And I'm bothering because you have knowledge that I want--you just keep confusing the useful knowledge (information on functions and typology) with the worthless conjecture (your personal overzealous reads on my inner psyche.)
I'm bothering, for the moment, because I'm hoping you'll share some of your knowledge on the former, and shut up already about the latter because you've failed miserably in that regard.