Jeremy8419
Permabanned
- Joined
- May 6, 2016
- Messages
- 771
- MBTI Type
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 925
- Instinctual Variant
- so/sx
Exactly what "context on the subject matter" is incorrect? And just how do you see my response to taking your suggested test? More assumptions.
Your reasoning is here is circular. You have set up a set of false equivalences under which you and only you can be correct. You and only you can know what everyone else here knows and thinks - better than they do themselves. If anyone disagrees with you, you question their type and/or call them ignorant. It is noteworthy that I have never seen you admit to being wrong.
Moreover I was discussing gender, which applies both within and without the context of socionics, or any personality typing system for that matter. As someone already observed, we are what we are. All these systems don't change anything, they are simply our attempts to try to make sense of it in a way that is helpful.
You're better served going look into things related to biology and sex to see why you aren't classifying sex, than looking into personality theories, as it is something very, and precisely, concrete.