R
ReflecTcelfeR
Guest
it's like Se but abstract. But what is this abstraction? What do they see?
This is how I've come to believe it works. When a cognitive function test is taken most Ne dominants have what some would deem a reasonable amount of Se to back it up, which to me shows the need to be in the moment to actually attain information, of course everyone does this, but in order for an abstraction, which I think may mean summary more than actually "not concrete", to be correct we have to have solidified information to work from, as it would seem I think Ni- doms might look towards the past more than they would on the present in order to come up with a personalized vision. The abstraction itself I have considered it a theory, or an assumption that must be proven true. It's forming the future without knowing what will happen. An abstraction is taking the present moment and predicting and guessing all the possibilities that could occur, wherein our judging functions take hold and decide which we want to happen (Te), or what will happen (Ti).