Matthew_Z
That chalkboard guy
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2009
- Messages
- 1,256
- MBTI Type
- xxxx
I'm still trying to figure out how to score ESTP.I can take any test any time anywhere and deliberately score (i know this is not the best word) any type I want.
I'm still trying to figure out how to score ESTP.I can take any test any time anywhere and deliberately score (i know this is not the best word) any type I want.
I'm still trying to figure out how to score ESTP.
Fair enough. Would you describe yourself as highly introverted? I'm thinking maybe INTP who leans more on tertiary Si than on secondary Ne for you, at this point. You do seem exceptionally internally organized, but you have a sense of practicality and a distaste for imprecision and whimsy that strikes me as kind of Ti+Si.
Wait a second... how would you even begin to fathom my internal organization if you've only seen me externally?
I thought there were few members here (Costring? Matthew_Z?) who were indecisive whether they are INTP or ISTJs... am I mistaken?
Every then and now I ask myself, if I'm an ISTJ... and why wouldn't I be an INTP instead. Every test I've taken has given me a result of ISTJ (except one gave me IxTJ). But yet I don't feel particularly ISTJish. I mean I strongly dislike organizations, religions, military, traditions and formalities.
So, INTPs, what made you think you were ISTJs over INTPs?
And, ISTJs, what made you think you were INTPs over ISTJs?
That vastly differs from the Introverted Sensing Jung (Socionics, as well) spoke of ....Si (dominant function for ISTJ/ISFJ and secondary for ESTJ/ESFJ) remembers the real details of past experiences in much greater depth than other types, which results in some amazing photographic memory and capacity for memorization of unevaluated data. (Si doesn't actually make decisions though; it just stores all this raw sensory information for future reference so that it can be most prepared when the time for a decision comes.)
I'm just taking your word for it when I read your posts on this thread. Your self-descriptions seem very Ti, and you agreed with my description of a strictly organized internal thought process. Obviously my analysis is wrong if the information you've provided about yourself is inaccurate.
Ah, but I've only provided a fraction of who I am in this thread, the ISTJ-ish part. There's more to me than precision, but it is a very effective way to get the job done.
That vastly differs from the Introverted Sensing Jung (Socionics, as well) spoke of ....
MZ is so LII.
Not really.Which is virtually the same thing as INTP. Sounds like we agree.
Most Socionics tests I've taken put me as LII or LSI, also with SLI as a possible type.MZ is so LII.
Not really.
Function definitions differ greatly (specifically Si, Se, Te).
I was referring to Jung's description of Introverted Sensation in "Psychological Types." There's some site out there that has the descriptions.
I thought there were few members here (Costring? Matthew_Z?) who were indecisive whether they are INTP or ISTJs... am I mistaken?
Every then and now I ask myself, if I'm an ISTJ... and why wouldn't I be an INTP instead. Every test I've taken has given me a result of ISTJ (except one gave me IxTJ). But yet I don't feel particularly ISTJish. I mean I strongly dislike organizations, religions, military, traditions and formalities.
So, INTPs, what made you think you were ISTJs over INTPs?
And, ISTJs, what made you think you were INTPs over ISTJs?
Because I'm not really looking for my own type, but to hear what these INTP-ISTJ people have to say. INTP <-> ISTJ is a big jump, but still some people seem to be uncertain which one they are. I've noticed that this pair is more common than any other possible pair of types. Well, ENFP <-> ISTJ is a common pair too, but that can be explained with the shadow personality.