S
Society
Guest
I can't see how the type being "the rarest" (statistically) would possess more mistypes...
i don't mean in general, i mean specifically to those here: if the statics of users here were anywhere close to what you'd expect based on the population of each type, or - since some argument can be made that introverts are more likely to spend more time here - at the very least within introverts, you might be correct. in truth they are largely disproportional, and INFJs are the most disproportional among them. that means is that too assume that every INFJ here is an actual INFJ, is to assume that INFJs are remarkably more likely then any other type to find out about typology, generate interest & seek information about it, and choose to participate in a community built around it... or a large chunk of them are mistyped. we have no reason to assume the first, so the later is a more likely explanation - either way, this is a huge statistical anomaly that certainly deserves one.