Thalassa
Permabanned
- Joined
- May 3, 2009
- Messages
- 25,183
- MBTI Type
- ISFP
- Enneagram
- 6w7
- Instinctual Variant
- sx
Ah, gotcha. Thankfully, I have no desire to do any of those things. I'm not a huge fan of people in general, but my morality would never allow me to crush another human life in order to get what I want. (My conscience is a bitch that way.) And I love animals; in fact, I agree with April from Parks and Recreation, who said that animals "should be rewarded for not being people."
In short, I may seem scary, but I'm harmless. I suspect that my 33% can mostly be attributed to my inordinate fondness for roller coasters.
Same. I am highly spontaneous, sometimes change plans, and am open to adventure. I mean you have to have multiple traits in combination for psychopathy to even apply, but apparently the lower your score the more likely you are to be good helping people or animals. I like the Parks and Recreation quote, that's right up my alley
Anyway if some people didn't have partial traits they wouldn't be able to do what it is they do. While I strongly disagree it's "neccessary" to be able to run a greedy corporation or corrupt government, people who have higher risk taking and cool heads, like Winston Churchill, are necessary to fight bad guys. I mean some people will set you on fire as soon as look at you, I'm glad there are people who can stand being prison wardens, at least those who aren't full blown sociopaths themselves. Even ethical politicians and police officers need a certain strength, even if they have high empathy, it's great if they are not emotionally reactive.