*sigh*
A person can be hateful or spiteful. People exist as items situated with respect to both the inner and outer words. So questions of motive, responsibility, appropriacy, and adequacy apply to them. Cognitive functions are unlike people in that they are not situated with respect to judgment in any environment other than their own. If they weren't, the notions of objective and subjective wouldn't exist and nor would people. To get to access the normal questions of people and persons by talking about cognitive functions, you have first, at minimum, to present the functions in dynamic opposition and as somehow joined.
Consider, for example, hate and spite don't exist if there is no representation of other people and their position. There is no such judgment as hateful nor spiteful to make of Fi unless, at minimum, Te (or Fe) exists to compare people to people. And even then you need other people to exist first.
Which necessarily presents us with the basic problem for the existence of pure function theory: that no function exists in any complete form, ever. Meaning, however useful function theory is in describing the underlying patterns of a person's cognition, individual cognitive structure always contains something more.