TheCheeseBurgerKing
New member
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2013
- Messages
- 473
- MBTI Type
- ISTP
- Enneagram
- 8
[MENTION=825]ygolo[/MENTION] I never said that I wanted to steralize 10% of the population either, I started on this thread by saying I thought limiting their birth after a certain point was a good idea.
Instead of asking me what I think like an intelligient adult, you just keep trying to trap me in what I've already said, lol.
Here's fresh start.
I simply think that genetic manipulation, in theory, is good.
I am not familiar with the history of what has happened with eugenics in communistic countries.
No, I do not think that Joseph Stalin's ghost should come back and kill all of the mentally handiapped people.
I do think that the idea of reducing mentally handicapped people is good.
Because of that belief, I would advocate research on the subject of manipulation.
Like I said, i understand that tampering with genes is dangerous.
I get that for this to be done in an ethical manner, I would have to happen quite gradually.
I also know that communism has not worked in the past 100 years.
No, I am no going to start a communist movement.
Any other questions?
EDIT: I just saw your last edit. I agree mostly. I mean I guess if it were really that cut and dry then I don't have one. I made my earlier point under the assumption that the better genes could be isolated. Either way though, research can never be a bad thing.
[MENTION=825]ygolo[/MENTION]
Now I'm starting to see what I believe to be your point. That eugenics movements have good intentions, but they are mislead and will not achieve what they set out to do. Just like communism.
Instead of asking me what I think like an intelligient adult, you just keep trying to trap me in what I've already said, lol.
Here's fresh start.
I simply think that genetic manipulation, in theory, is good.
I am not familiar with the history of what has happened with eugenics in communistic countries.
No, I do not think that Joseph Stalin's ghost should come back and kill all of the mentally handiapped people.
I do think that the idea of reducing mentally handicapped people is good.
Because of that belief, I would advocate research on the subject of manipulation.
Like I said, i understand that tampering with genes is dangerous.
I get that for this to be done in an ethical manner, I would have to happen quite gradually.
I also know that communism has not worked in the past 100 years.
No, I am no going to start a communist movement.
Any other questions?
EDIT: I just saw your last edit. I agree mostly. I mean I guess if it were really that cut and dry then I don't have one. I made my earlier point under the assumption that the better genes could be isolated. Either way though, research can never be a bad thing.
[MENTION=825]ygolo[/MENTION]
Now I'm starting to see what I believe to be your point. That eugenics movements have good intentions, but they are mislead and will not achieve what they set out to do. Just like communism.