I compute things in shades. I mean, It's not a problem, it's like working with .01 variations in a flow instead of 0\1 coding.
I don't think the 'black and white vs fuzziness' applies. It's only an issue when I need to explain things, and that's why I have basically two 'chatty' personas:
One will seek the simple pleasure of speaking\arguing some.
One will go way deeper because I will do the effort to try and translate my thoughts into clear expressions, which can really be a major pain in the ass and will never ever be a satisfying translation.
Something tells me entps are pros at using metaphores
Ti strives for clarity. If something is gray, it just means you need to come up with a better framework.
I hate it when things are gray -- I just take it as a sign that I need to think through it better.
That's because ur an infj with a pimped up Ti, not an entp.
edit: I think the main problem here is that I and perhaps entps in general will even argue expressions such as 'black and white' and 'fuzziness'. You could say for example that in the end if there's an absolute truth there's a level of 'black and white interpretation' to everything, but then again even if you had that knowledge it'd still be like seeing an apple, what you see is just a construct based upon a 'reality' (you can't even say thing, things are a mental construct).
And hell, I could argue every single world for a year if I wanted to be 'precise', so I can't work in 'black and white'.
Think of a quantum computer, the 0\1 can be 60% at 0 and 40% at 1. It's the same thing.
I think that's what Ne+Ti is about.
Ni+Ti for example would rather be about taking 0 and 1, and zooming in to 10^-15 using different perspectives just as science uses different technics for different measured scales.