wildcat
New member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2007
- Messages
- 3,622
- MBTI Type
- INTP
I discussed the Enneagram loci number (27) with Xander.
It is many years ago.
I recall we agreed the loci number 27 is bound to leave loci behind.
One of us proposed the actual number of the loci is 36, and one of us proposed it may be 45.
But of course, if we have 36, 45 is an underhand. And vice versa.
36/4 = 9/1
9/2 = 4,5
10 = (T)1
In any viewpoint of the MBTI a dimension is lost. Parallelly we lose the numbers of the lost dimension.
They appear only when we shift viewpoint.
Enneagram is different. We silent the numbers, we do not lose them.
How to find the silent numbers?
Time is linear.
Space is not.
The unlinear is not the measure of the linear.
The linear is the measure of the unlinear.
It is many years ago.
I recall we agreed the loci number 27 is bound to leave loci behind.
One of us proposed the actual number of the loci is 36, and one of us proposed it may be 45.
But of course, if we have 36, 45 is an underhand. And vice versa.
36/4 = 9/1
9/2 = 4,5
10 = (T)1
In any viewpoint of the MBTI a dimension is lost. Parallelly we lose the numbers of the lost dimension.
They appear only when we shift viewpoint.
Enneagram is different. We silent the numbers, we do not lose them.
How to find the silent numbers?
Time is linear.
Space is not.
The unlinear is not the measure of the linear.
The linear is the measure of the unlinear.