Economica, I don't really mean to be antagonistic here, but are you sure you're inTj, because you seem to be engaging in quite a bit of Fe for a rational. Regardless, if it's feedback and constructive criticism you want...
The site needs elaboration. Even if it is a beta, it's still not enough. People who know MBTI will disagree with many of the type assessments, people who are researching will be disappointed with lack of explanations, and passerby's who stumble on it will simply stumble away from it.
Perhaps, instead of separating pages into male, female, philosophers, insert male, female, and philosopher sections into types or temperament pages. That way, adding new people would be more streamlined, because the current system is not at all working out. Furthermore, explain how you came to conclusions on types, because it seems most people disagree about much of your typing. The structure to the main Keirsey website may be a good example of where to start.
This is also the reason why INTPc gave you a more negative response than you may have hoped for. INTPs live off of reasoning, the most so of all the rationals, and the little reasoning you offer in the form of quotes is hardly sufficient for true backing. Regardless of the medium, to ask an INTP's opinions on a matter in a way that does not meet their basic requirements will never yield a positive result.