You said something that you didnt mean...
Nope.
I meant exactly what I said.
You just misinterpreted what I said, because you made a bad assumption.
This has all been clearly demonstrated above. I don't know why you find it so difficult to understand.
...and expected me to read what you said, while making some sort of trap with this, where im not supposed to read what you say.
Clearly, you are having serious difficulty understanding this...
For someone who really likes talking about how other people are supposedly stupid, you certainly don't seem to possess a great deal of intellectual acumen yourself. How can you actually go around pejoratively accusing someone of being in a "false" Ni reality, when you are so obviously and completely disconnected from reality yourself? Ironically, you could probably use some of that Te that you so loathe... maybe then you could actually figure what's going on in the external world.
But you made a trap where i get irritated by what you say (even tho you didnt mean it), because i dont like people making this sort of false claims about me.
What you think I said, is not what I said, so, no, I did not mean this misinterpretation. Why would I have?
I have explicitly told you why I mentioned you twice now, but each time you've failed to acknowledge why I
did.
Once again:
Zarathustra said:
The reason I mentioned you in the post is precisely because you would say something as stupid as the above.
The reason I mentioned you in the post is because you overaccentuate the role of Fi in a TJ's Te.
And because you hold and express ignorant views of Te and TJs in general.
Jung would hang his head in disgust at you.
So, yeah, those are the
actual reasons.
Not your misinterpreted ones.
Yippee, you managed to get me here ranting about you telling lies about me.
Nope.
No lies told.
Just your bad assumptions and weak reasoning skills revealed.
All you've been ranting about are your baseless assumptions and your foolhardy attempts to defend them.
How many times must I explicitly state it before you get it?
Zarathustra said:
The reason I mentioned you in the post is precisely because you would say something as stupid as the above.
The reason I mentioned you in the post is because you overaccentuate the role of Fi in a TJ's Te.
And because you hold and express ignorant views of Te and TJs in general.
Jung would hang his head in disgust at you.
One additional reason: to allow you to reveal your brilliant intellect to the rest of us.
I can now see that it was a trap...
Not really.
I just mentioned you for the reasons above.
You just handled it all so clumsily that you made it look like a trap.
...but the way you constructed your trap is totally irrational and doesent prove your view on me.
Well, as I said before, I didn't really construct a trap, but, yeah, you managed to prove everything about yourself I could have wanted you to all by yourself. Thanks.
Because it only proves that if you make a claim about someone and tell him the claim(by using the mention tag), he will come to the topic and explain that its not true what you claim about him.
Actually, it's more like he'll come, make a bad assumption about what you wrote, revealing his generally weak reasoning skills and intellect, then further demonstrate these flaws, by attempting to justify his original bad assumption, the whole time demonstrating your original intent of revealing how weak his reasoning skills and intellect are, despite the fact that he constantly goes around (falsely and undeservedly) criticizing other peoples' reasoning skills and intellects.
You said something thats not true about me, thats why i started replying to you.
Perhaps you should have studied harder in your English classes, cuz you don't seem to understand what it means to "say something" about somebody else. Your bad assumptions aren't my problem. I'm sorry that you are so oblivious to subtle shades of meaning.
Zarathustra said:
Yes, but, once again, per the above, I never said what you assumed and have claimed that I said.
This doesent make any sense.
Actually, yeah, it does.
Next time study harder.
Why the heck did you mention me in the first place?
Once again, how many times do I have to explicitly state it before you understand?
How many times do I have to explicitly tell you that I'm about to explicitly tell you before you understand what I explicitly tell you?
For the third time this post, and fifth time in the last several posts:
Zarathustra said:
The reason I mentioned you in the post is precisely because you would say something as stupid as the above.
The reason I mentioned you in the post is because you overaccentuate the role of Fi in a TJ's Te.
And because you hold and express ignorant views of Te and TJs in general.
Jung would hang his head in disgust at you.
No reason for that other than making a trap to irritate me.
Actually, the
actual reasons I mentioned you are enumerated above: all four of them. There is also one more above that I included for the first time in this post.
Its not about forrest and trees, stop assuming shit and try to understand.
It's amazing how myopic you are that you think
I'm the one falsely assuming shit and not understanding, when any intelligent person reading this thread will readily see that
you are the one who made the bad assumption, who's done a poor job trying to defend that bad assumption, and who clearly is the one who's not getting it.
You do this all the time, yet are completely unaware of it.
Jung would hang his head in shame.
Seriously dont you have anything else to do?
All I did was mention you, along with two others, in a post.
That takes about two seconds.
You're the one who came in with all the shitty assumptions and misinterpretations.
I seriously wonder how ss can put up with you..
Believe it or not, despite your flowing hair, I'm really not attracted to you.
She's a lot smarter, better-looking, and more decent of a human being.
I really don't treat the two of you even remotely the same.
...also im kinda curious to know what she thinks about you getting on my nerves all the time with your stupid bullshit.
Funny that you'd bring her up, cuz she's complained to me numerous times about the reps you send her.
Frankly, she thinks you're a disgusting person.
I mean this trap you placed here again, doesent even work.
How bout we let everyone else decide on that...
You might not work, but "the trap" certainly did...
Its like me making a topic and saying that you are gay and posting a picture of cock saying suck on this, then you would naturally think that im calling you an homosexual and telling you to suck a cock, but then saying "no i was just saying that you are a joyfull person and i wanted to suck this lolly pop that im holding, the picture of a cock was irrelevant and only for enjoyment of this other homosexual INTJ on this forum(who shall remain unknown for now)" and then saying that you fell on my trap again cuz you are assuming stupid shit that i didnt really mean.
Actually, it's not very much like that at all.
It's more like, to use something similar to your metaphor, posting a picture of a cock, making a comment next to it about how some people love to suck cock, and then mentioning you next to it cuz you love to give handjobs.
Yup, that's a
much more fitting metaphor.