@
iNtrovert, I don't have much of a way to explain this but you
speak INFJ. It's like Ti writing. It's harder for me to understand, takes me a few times to go through and trace the logic. You're an INFJ, there's no doubt.
Ne users will gain intuitions based on direct experience in an environment in that moment. Its there. From what I understand they're objective even though Ne users in my opinion tend to be the most narcissistic and full of themsleves because these "unseen" things can often be pulled straight out of their ass. This is why there's a clear difference when ESTP's walk what they talk, in comparison to ENTP's who just tell everyone how fantastic they are at everything with no real clear proof.
Well, ENxPs do tend to be bullshitters, lol, but there's also curious kind of suspension of disbelief that goes along with running Ne information, where you kind of ride the wave-tips as fast as they arise, and for the moment, you
are that information, you understand it, embody it, become it, and then you leave what's not useful of it behind, integrating it into your conceptual schema. It's not really about narcissism or being full of yourself as much as it is you're simply swept up in the concept and you're excited by the concept and you completely
become the concept, much like an ESxP completely
becomes the action or the music - ExxPs have this way of
becoming the process, inhabiting it and then leaving it behind as we travel on to new things. It's just that ENxPs are riding conceptual information, which isn't as available to see tangibly, so you can't see all those theoretical strings that the ENxP followed to get to the information that's being "pulled out of their ass" - it's not, really, it followed a very long and complex line of thought, it's just not visible to non-Ne'ers. And then other people sort of freak out because you seem to completely drop whatever you just "believed" in, but you never really
believed it, you just had to take it all in to get the most from it, and you're still travelling that line of information that took you there in the first place.
Antimony said:
"Let's talk about the similarities between beavers and clouds. Beavers float in water and clouds float in air. So for fish beavers are like clouds."
Accurate.