Samuel De Mazarin
Wonderer
- Joined
- May 27, 2008
- Messages
- 1,026
- MBTI Type
- ENTP
It's a mistake to automatically presume that a Thinker is without impressive emotional range, consequent to his cognitive preferences. Compassion and justice are variable ideals; individually-resigned to shades of the same coin...
Conversely, some of the greatest strategists I've encountered were Fs. Lao Tzu is perhaps a historical example of a brilliant NF (INFP) tactician.
For my dime, the ideal framework is a balanced incorporation of both theatres to arrive at an assemblage free from the constrictions of generic Type convention. That is to say, I don't find much credibility with the implied if/then algorithim that commonly divides a T from an F.
Think of it like chemical covalence - protons and neutrons combining into subatomic particles. From these interactions, all matter is possible...(Hilbert space...!)
Neither is ultimately independent, as both unify towards advanced thought.
I feel the approach of a discussion on something similar to Hegelian logic... aufhebung and what not...