I don't understand, she's from a forum right?
People on forums aren't real, that's a well known fact.
lol
As I've discovered, this is the real difference between the ENTP/INFJ perspective.
are you implying i don't have a heart
( )
Newpers. That at first blush, when you see screen names, you see an opportunity for humanoid (read human-like) interaction. But when I see screen names, I see and wonder about the individual behind it. It takes a sustained effort for us to accomplish the opposite.
I don't see a humanoid, I see letters on the screen. If I hadn't met you irl and had proof of your existence, I would have thought that HAL was at it again... everyone else is still suspect.
Or just young.Edit: ...which is why I wonder if cattywample is mistyped.
2) Discussing is never personnal, it's not related to people but to what they say, I mean, if somebody proved me wrong with a nice argument i'd just say and think 'nice one dude' and appreciate it as the quality entertainement\experience it is.
How does this support cattywample as an ENTP?
You don't even know the guy\gal\undefined gender !
*heavy use of mbti clichés below*
For some young entps, it's a bit hard to deal with your everyday caring mature infj.
It's interesting, so the entp won't want it to stop. Like making concessions to keep a discussion developping further if you will.
I don't see a humanoid, I see letters on the screen. If I hadn't met you irl and had proof of your existence, I would have thought that HAL was at it again... everyone else is still suspect.
No actually, I meant that it's a hard situation to be in for somebody who doesnt take people as unique beautiful snowflakes but rather as the agents allowing access to stimulating discussion\Good times.
I could say this isn't true, but as far as the mbti 'nf' vs 'nt' comparison goes it's a fitting one.
So if somebody's interesting we can be willing to do some sacrifices to keep the relation up if we feel like the relation we have with someone isn't one we are likely to obtain with somebody else.
But seeing people as 'who we spend our present\are focusing on at the moment', we do not naturally think of them as part of a complex social spiderweb. So the idea that we can harm somebody and so our relation with that person by something we said \ did when this person wasn't present\concerned by the action\message is a bit hard to adapt to.
I like my theory better.
So if somebody's interesting we can be willing to do some sacrifices to keep the relation up if we feel like the relation we have with someone isn't one we are likely to obtain with somebody else.
Ants! My favorite! *sprinkles you with Feeler Dust* It's just talcum powder, really.
I rigged the ants with uranium\pepper anti personnel mines. thou shalt perisht!