What I was getting at, was in the questioning itself, I kind of had to rank my answers. So say in one group I strongly agree with all the statements. I have to rank my answers and pick the statement I agree with most, then next most, then 3rd, then fourth. So even though I might strongly agree with the lowest ranking statement - once my options are used up it creates the impression I am neutral with one of the statements, even though I feel I strongly agree with it. I didn't think that was a great approach, but I rolled with it.
If I was to apply the same standard the test forced upon me to the how the test ranks my type, the scoring should not be able to rank me "low" on all the type categories. Think of the scoring as agreeing/disagreeing that I match the personality type listed. So once the test ranks me low on one type (i.e. it strongly disagrees I am that type), that low option should be removed for the other types (just like the test removed my option to strongly agree/disagree with multiple statements). The test should have said, well, I can't tell what type he really is, but I have to rank one option the highest.
But it didn't. In my view, the test failed to live up to it's own standards.
Anyways, no big deal, I'm not mystified by my type, I'm INTP through and through. I just took the test (and maybe I did rush a little, but I did consider the questions honestly) just to see what it was all about.
I also took the Sakinorva test mentioned earlier in the thread. I know it's not MBTI per se, but it had some MBTI like outcomes. It scored me as INTP for the Grant function type and the two others which used MBTI letters. So I felt that test was accurate in it's way.