It would help if Fi wasn't so hard to 'get' for people. Ti seems simple enough. It looks for inconsistencies, seeks precision in speaking, etc. whereas Fi is always described in some almost ethereal way, like you have to have wings to understand it. Fe is misunderstood by a lot of people too. I'm not always looking for harmony, but I know how to speak in order to achieve it if I WANT to (Fe).
Below is a bit of explanation of Ti I can easily understand as I do this a LOT. I like to be understood, and I like to seek the objective truth, and almost NEED precision (One example, are you a secret or even open grammar nazi?). For instance, just recently, I felt incredibly uncomfortable (to the point of speaking out loud to MYSELF) when I heard a 'scientist' say they'd found the "oldest cave art." I loudly said, "THAT YOU KNOW OF. Just because another hasn't been FOUND yet OMG." See? annoying. *shrug* Precision.
Introverted Thinking often involves finding just the right word to clearly express an idea concisely, crisply, and to the point.
Using introverted Thinking is like having an internal sense of the essential qualities of something, noticing the fine distinctions that make it what it is and then naming it.
It also involves an internal reasoning process of deriving subcategories of classes and sub-principles of general principles.
These can then be used in problem solving, analysis, and refining of a product or an idea.
This process is evidenced in behaviors like taking things or ideas apart to figure out how they work.
The analysis involves looking at different sides of an issue and seeing where there is inconsistency. [Personal note here. Inconsistency SHOUTS at me when I see/hear/sense it. It will NOT be ignored, and I can't let it pass without studying it, thinking about it, finding what's behind it.]
In so doing, we search for a "leverage point" that will fix problems with the least amount of effort or damage to the system.
We engage in this process when we notice logical inconsistencies between statements and frameworks, using a model to evaluate the likely accuracy of what's observed.
Are you sure to be an INFJ ? Your answer sounds pretty much INTJ
48.39 per cent T. against 51.61 F. Some day it could be the other way round...
My bypassed analysis, which clearly outlines the objective facts of what functions are being used in the situation he presented, led to that overtly assertive post. Trust me, it was much more feely, passive, and polite in it's first iteration, lol! I beefed it up for effect, but I did SAY it in a fun and pleasant tone, which you can't hear, even if WHAT I'm saying is direct.
Yeah... We have to add sounds as soon as possible to this great forum to avoid any misunderstandings !
I'm all about voices and intonation of the voice, tonal inflection and so on, and usually I'm talking in a tone of a character other than myself, so the typing comes off harsh or cruel or just off altogether, lol. I need more than Emoticons.
A foreigner can hardly understand 100 per cent of Strongbad's speeches ! More specifically the white character.
You can't possibly be serious. Homestar and Strongbad are hilarious! That sucks for you....aww well. I was doubled over on the floor in pain laughing after watching it for the first time. Just brilliant stuff.
To help you, you can also compare yourself with some people on this forum, the way they express themselves and what they really focus on,
and thinking about watching some videos about the differences of each function.
I did. I have met 2 kind of INTP's and researched about what they do in their childhood. Pretty sure, when I was a kid, I'm veryyyy extroverted. I just became an introvert when I was a college. So, before I thought that my type is INTP. This changed when I met with INTP's and they're a lot more different than me since I can become an extrovert or introvert if I wanted to, however, the INTP's I know can't. Plus I'm a lot more reckless compared to them )